(DRAFT) - Taxonomy
                              Species PANTHER, FLORIDA
                                Species Id ESIS054001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



TAXONOMY

NAME - PANTHER, FLORIDA OTHER COMMON NAMES - PANTHER, FLORIDA;CATAMOUNT;COUGAR;LION and MOUNTAIN;PAINTER;PANTHER;PUMA ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Mammals PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - CHORDATA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - MAMMALIA, ORDER AND SUBORDER - CARNIVORA, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - FELIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - FELIS, SPECIES AND SSP - CONCOLOR, CORYI SCIENTIFIC NAME - FELIS CONCOLOR CORYI AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi Bangs, 1899 KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Mammal PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Mammalia ORDER: Carnivora FAMILY: Felidae The Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi Bangs) is a medium sized, dark subspecies with short and rather stiff pelage. It has relatively long limbs and small feet in comparison with other subspecies (01,02). Although there is a great deal of variation in color, the pelage is usually tawny brown, darkest along the middle of the back and becoming lighter or clay-colored along the sides, with short black-tipped hairs. The face is very dark, but upper lips, chin and throat are white. The back of the ears and sides of the nose are dark brown or blackish. Guard hairs on the inner sides of limbs and belly are white, but mixed with light reddish under fur, giving the appearance of gray fur. This becomes whiter toward the median ventral line. The tail is often very dark dorsally, ending in a black tip (01,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12). The most distinctive feature of the skull is the fairly broad, flat frontal region with shortened rostrum and correspondingly Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 expanded and inflated, or highly arched nasals. The outer margins of the nasals may overlap the maxilla and frontal bones. This gives the animal the appearance of having a very prominent nose (03,04,12). In addition to the general appearance of the skull and pelage coloration, there are 3 distinct physical features which aid in positive identification of the Florida panther in most cases (04). These traits are: 1) The tail has a right angle bend in the last vertebra, giving it a crook at the end of the appendage; 2) There is a whorl or cowlick in the middle of the back; 3) There is irregular white flicking on the head, neck and shoulders (02,04). Data obtained in a study of 480 F. concolor museum skins; 24 being F.c. coryi specimens, including type specimens F.c. floridana Cary 1896 (12,13), F.c. coryi Bangs 1899 (01,12) and F.c. arundivaga Hollister 1911 (12,14); and 7 live captured Florida panthers examined during capture and radio tagging operations (04) suggests that these characteristics are carried in the gene pool of the species at a low frequency, but are expressed in a high frequency in the Florida subspecies. This is probably due to isolation. These characteristics occur randomly in other subspecies, but in F.c. coryi in a combination of all 3 (04). A mature male weighs 100-148 lbs., is 7 ft. from nose to tip of tail and has a shoulder height of 24-28 in. The female is somewhat smaller weighing 60-100 lbs. and measures about 6 ft. from tip to tip (02,42). Panther kittens weigh from 6.63 to 7.73 lbs., are yellowish-brown with dark brown or blackish bands around the tail until they are around 6 months of age. They also have blue eyes (05,15). Common name synonyms are cougar, painter, mountain lion, puma, panther and catamount (02,06). The Florida panther was first described as a separate geographic race of F. concolor by Charles Cory in 1896. He assigned it the name F.c. floridana. Bangs in 1899 pointed out this name was not correct because F. floridana had previously been used for a bobcat. He also believed the Florida panther had been restricted to peninsular Florida and could no longer integrade with any other form and doubted if it ever had. He gave it full specific rank with the name F. coryi (12). Nelson and Goldman (1929) (12,16) revised the taxonomic classifications of the Felis concolor group and assigned the Florida panther subspecific status with the designation F.c. coryi Bangs. This designation included F. arundivaga which was designated by Hollister (1911) from specimens collected in Louisiana (12,14). The most recent taxonomic review of the species is given by Goldman (1946) (03,12). There are a variety of places which are useful references for species identification. They are as follows: 1) Field Museum of Nat. History, Roosevelt Rd., Lake Shore Dr., Chicago, IL 60605. 312-922- 9410. 1 type specimen of F.c. floridana Cory. 2) Museum of Comparative Zoology, Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138. 617-495-2467. One type specimen of Felis concolor coryi Bangs. 3) National Museum of Nat. History, 10th St. & Constitution Ave, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20560. 202-357-2664. 1 type specimen of F.c. arundivaga. 4) Florida State Museum, Laurie Wilkins, Mammal Range, Collections Mgr., University of FL, Gainesville, FL 32611. 904-392-1721. 7 F.c. coryi skins, various skulls and skeletal parts. 5) Tallahassee Junior Taxonomy - 2 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 Museum, 3945 Museum Dr., Tallahassee, FL 32304. 904-576-1636. 1 male, 1 female captive specimens from Robert Baudy's captive breeding facility. Do not have cowlick or crook in tail. 6) Robert C. Belden, Panther Biologist, FL Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm., Wildlife Research Lab, 4005 S Main St., Gainesville, FL 32601. 904-376-6481. Descriptions, photos, maps, etc. (most pertinent info). 7) Tom Logan, Bureau Chief, Bureau of Wildlife Research, Division of Wildlife, FL Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm., 620 S Meridian St., Tallahassee, FL 32301. 904-488-3831. Descriptions, photos, maps, etc. 8) Robert Baudy, Savage Kingdom, P.O. Box 100, Center Hill, FL 33514. 904-793- 2109. 1 male, 2 females live, 3 kittens born Aug, 1983; 1 female 8-10 months old (USFWS captive breeding permit PRT2-5214). 9) Cheryl Girton, Belleview, FL. 904-687-4859. 1 male, 18 mo., 2 males, 1 female 10 weeks, from Robert Baudy. 10) Doris Newman, Sessner, FL. 813-685-5947. 1 female from Robert Baudy. 11) Mr. Lester Piper, Everglades Wonder Garden, P.O. Box 262, Bonita Springs, FL 33926. Taxonomy - 3
                                  (DRAFT) - Status
                              Species PANTHER, FLORIDA
                                Species Id ESIS054001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



STATUS

Coded Status Alabama; Federal Endangered Alabama; State Listed Alabama; Unofficially Listed Arkansas; Federal Endangered Florida; Federal Endangered Florida; Officially Listed Georgia; Federal Endangered Georgia; State Listed Louisiana; Federally Endangered Louisiana; State Recognized Mississippi; Federal Endangered Mississippi; State Listed South Carolina; Federal Endangered South Carolina; State Listed E: Federal Endangered Non-consumptive recreational Ceremonial/Cultural Medicinal Ornamental COMMENTS ON STATUS - U.S. STATUSES AND LAWS: The Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) is listed as an Endangered species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (50 CFR 17.11; P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1540), as amended. The subspecies has this status wherever found including the States of AL, AR, FL, GA, LA, MS, and SC. This subspecies is protected by the Lacey Act (P.L. 97-79, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) which makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, or offspring): (1) in interstate or foreign commerce if taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any State law or regulation; or (2) if taken or possessed in violation of any U.S. law, treaty, or regulation or in violation of Indian tribal law. It is also unlawful to possess any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, and offspring) within the U.S. territorial or special maritime jurisdiction (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7) that is taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, foreign law, or Indian tribal law. RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCIES: Status - 1 (DRAFT) - Status Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 USFWS -Responsible for the management/recovery, listing, and law enforcement/protection of this species. BIA -Responsible for the law enforcement/protection of this species with applicable State and Federal laws on public lands under their control. Also responsible for management/recovery on Bureau of Indian Affairs lands. DOD (COE) -Responsible for the law enforcement/protection of this species with applicable State and Federal laws on public land under their control. Also responsible for management/recovery on Department of Defense lands. NPS -Responsible for the law enforcement/protection of this species with applicable State and Federal laws on public lands under their control. Also responsible for conservation (Nat. Park System Organic Act - 16 U.S.C. 1, 2-3)/management/recovery on National Park Service lands. Taking, possessing, or disturbing of Federally listed species is prohibited on NPS lands (36 CFR 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3). All Federal agencies have responsibility to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by that agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of Critical Habitat (50 CFR 402), and to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of the species. Authority to grant related water development permits in the habitat of the panther rests with the Corps of Engineers (Dept. of the Army); in cooperation with the NPS (Interior) on the Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve; and in cooperation with the BIA on Indian Reservations. STATE STATUSES AND LAWS: STATE: Alabama DESIGNATED STATUS: Game Animal (mountain lion, cougar) ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. STATE STATUTES: 1982-83 (and probably most recent year) State Hunting Regulations, pp. 6 and 9 (No open season designated). UNOFFICIAL LIST: Endangered (F.c. coryi), Proceedings of the Symposium on Endangered and Threatened Species in Alabama. Alabama Museum of Natural History Bulletin. STATE: Arkansas, Georgia, and South Carolina DESIGNATED STATUS: Endangered (Felis concolor) ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Arkansas Game and Fish Commission. Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Game and Fish Division. Status - 2 (DRAFT) - Status Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 South Carolina Wildlife and Marine Resources Department. STATE STATUTES: -Arkansas Cooperative Agreement with the USFWS. -Rules and Regulations of the State of Georgia Sec. 391-4-13-.09, Jan. 11, 1981. -South Carolina Regulations 123-150. STATE: Louisiana DESIGNATED STATUS: Recognized Endangered ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. STATE STATUTES: Louisiana Statutes Annotated 56:1901 to 56:1907. STATE: Florida, Mississippi DESIGNATED STATUS: Endangered (Felis concolor coryi) ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Mississippi Department of Wildlife Conservation. STATE STATUTES: -Florida Statutes Annotated 370.21, 372.01, 372.021, 372.04, 372.07; Rule 39-2.02, 39-3.02 Florida Administrative Code. -Florida Endangered and Threatened Species Act of 1977, Florida Statutes Annotated 372.072, Rule 39-27.03 Florida Administrative Code; July, 1983. -Florida Panther Act, Section 372.671, Florida Statutes; October, 1979. -Mississippi Public Notice No. 2156, Eff. Sept. 1, 1981. The Florida panther is listed as the "State Mammal" in Florida and is a focal point of the Governor's "Save the Everglades Program". INTERNATIONAL STATUSES, TREATIES, AND AGREEMENTS: The Florida panther is listed on Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES-I as of February 22, 1977). The Florida panther is also listed by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN Red Data Book as of June, 1970); and the Convention on Nature Protection and Wildlife Preservation in the Western Hemisphere, 1970. ECONOMIC STATUSES: The panther has tremendous aesthetic (nonconsumptive recreation) and educational value. It has been designated the State Mammal (FL) and is very prominent in the news and educational materials. It has ceremonial/cultural, medicinal and ornamental value to the American Indian (Miccosukee) in specific rituals (Corn/Harvest Festival) and powerful leadership recognition. The Osceola family (i.e., decendents of Chief Osceola, Seminole Indian Wars) are inherent members of the "Panther Clan," a family unit of the maternal order. This species may have generated some commercial or economic value to trophy game Status - 3 (DRAFT) - Status Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 hunters, however, due to such presently low numbers this is doubtful. 67/03/11:32 FR 04001/ - Listing as Endangered 77/02/22:42 FR 10462/10488 - Listing in CITES-I 85/07/22:50 FR 29901/29909 - Five year review Status - 4
     

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS

HABITAT - TERRESTRIAL TERRESTRIAL INLAND AQUATIC SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTRY TYPES SAF TYPE STAGE CLOSURE Longleaf Pine shrub--seedling Longleaf Pine young tree Longleaf Pine mature tree Longleaf Pine Old Growth shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth Longleaf Pine shrub--seedling Longleaf Pine young tree Longleaf Pine mature tree Longleaf Pine Old Growth shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth LAND USE - Industrial Transportation, communications, and Util Mixed Urban or Built-up Land Cropland and Pasture Orchards, Groves, Vineyards, Nurseries, Herbaceous Rangeland Deciduous Forest Land Evergreen Forest Land Mixed Forest Land Streams and Canals Reservoirs Forested Wetland Nonforested Wetland Transitional Areas NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY CODES NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Riverine, intermittent UB4 Riverine, intermittent UB3 Riverine, intermittent UB2 Riverine, intermittent SB4 Riverine, intermittent SB3 Riverine, intermittent SB2 Habitat Associations - 1 NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Riverine, intermittent OW0 Riverine, intermittent FL4 Riverine, intermittent FL3 Riverine, intermittent FL2 Riverine, intermittent AB5 Riverine, intermittent AB4 Riverine, intermittent AB2 Riverine, lower perennial UB4 Riverine, lower perennial UB3 Riverine, lower perennial UB2 Riverine, lower perennial SB4 Riverine, lower perennial SB3 Riverine, lower perennial SB2 Riverine, lower perennial OW0 Riverine, lower perennial EM Riverine, lower perennial AB5 Riverine, lower perennial AB4 Riverine, lower perennial AB2 Palustrine OW0 Palustrine FO Palustrine EM6 Palustrine EM5 Palustrine EM4 Palustrine EM3 Palustrine EM2 Palustrine EM1 Palustrine AB5 Palustrine AB4 Palustrine AB2 Riverine, intermittent UB4 Riverine, intermittent UB3 Riverine, intermittent UB2 Riverine, intermittent SB4 Riverine, intermittent SB3 Riverine, intermittent SB2 Riverine, intermittent OW0 Riverine, intermittent FL4 Riverine, intermittent FL3 Riverine, intermittent FL2 Riverine, intermittent AB5 Riverine, intermittent AB4 Riverine, intermittent AB2 Riverine, lower perennial UB4 Riverine, lower perennial UB3 Riverine, lower perennial UB2 Riverine, lower perennial SB4 Riverine, lower perennial SB3 Riverine, lower perennial SB2 Riverine, lower perennial OW0 Riverine, lower perennial EM Riverine, lower perennial AB5 Riverine, lower perennial AB4 Riverine, lower perennial AB2 Palustrine OW0 Palustrine FO Palustrine EM6 Palustrine EM5 Palustrine EM4 Palustrine EM3 Habitat Associations - 2 NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Palustrine EM2 Palustrine EM1 Palustrine AB5 Palustrine AB4 Palustrine AB2 COMMENTS ON HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS - The key habitat used by radio-tagged panthers was generally mixed-swamp forests (see section on "Home Range/Territory" in N-Biology). These subtropical dense forests are composed of mainly trees, shrubs, vines, ferns and epiphytes that occur as elongated strands that follow low drainage areas. The elevation is variable and ranges from deep water areas, inundated during most of the year to higher areas that are seldom inundated. Mostly, the land is seasonally flooded for months. The primary vegetation is: cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), red maple (Acer rubrum), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera), cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco), sweet bay (Magnolis virginiana), and red bay (Persea borbonia). Cypress (Taxodium distichum), willow (Salix caroliniana), pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana), and pond apple (Annona glabra) occur commonly in deeper water. Hammock vegetation, such as laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), dahoon (Ilex cassine), wild coffee (Psychatria undata), myrsine (Myrsine guianensis), and occasionally live oak (Quercus virginiana), mahogany (Swietenia mahagoni), gumbo-limbo (Bursera simaruba), pigeon plum (Coccoloba diversifolia), and slash pine (Pinus elliotii) occur on the higher land. The forest is usually a mixture of trees, but in some areas one species will predominate; such as willow (Salix sp.) in burned areas; and cypress (Taxodium distichum), pop ash or pond apple (Annona montana) in deep water. Cabbage palm predominates at the seaward end of some strands (04,34). Within the panthers habitat are also pine forests. Pine (Pinus elliotii), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) and scattered hardwood shrubs are in this kind of area. Grasses here are the dominant ground cover, such as beardgrass (Andropogon), three awn-grass (Aristida) and panic- grass (Panicum sp). Sedges, rushes and composites may also be present in this ground cover (34). Where there is hardwood, there is a layer of leaf litter 5 to 10 cm thick over the sand (35). Cypress forests occur in panther habitat also. Small cypress (Taxodium distichum) and scattered, sparse growths of herbaceous plants such as sawgrass (Cladium jamaicensis) and beak rushes (Rhynchospora) grow on a thin layer of marl soil or sand over limestone. Cypress domes and strands with larger trees also permeate the panther habitat. The trees will be tallest (20 m at Raccoon Point) (35) in the center and shorter (4 m at Raccoon Point) (35) toward the border with an egg shaped overall appearance. The strands follow low drainage depressions. Water and soil are deeper in the domes than in the surrounding forests. The soil depth at Raccoon Point, in this type of cypress forest, is 20 cm and is fairly constant with a fine to coarse sand. Shrubs and small swamp trees are the common understory here (34). Downed logs in the forested areas are used by the panther as den sites (19,20). There are many agricultural lands in panther habitat. Pasture lands have been created for cattle raising. There are a variety of row crops including corn, soybeans, watermelons, tomatoes, and others. There are also fruit orchards. Multiple land use practices in this area include: the presence of numerous hunting camps; hunting with dogs, airboats, swamp-buggies, ATC's, pick-up trucks; annual prescribed burning activities, research activities including aircraft use, illegal poaching activities (frogs, ibis, and alligators), and recreational tours. Other land use Habitat Associations - 3 activities within the Big Cypress include: grazing, camping, hiking, oil/gas development with associated access roads and spills, commercial jet-liner training at the Dade Jet-Port, commercial recreational facilities/activities, Indian villages and gift shops, and an auto test track was proposed to be located just two miles west of the Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve (36). Habitat Associations - 4
                                (DRAFT) - Food Habits
                              Species PANTHER, FLORIDA
                                Species Id ESIS054001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



FOOD HABITS

TROPHIC LEVEL - CARNIVORE LIFESTAGE FOOD FOOD PART General Poaceae General Deciduous Trees-Leaves/Twigs General Arthropods General Reptilia General Aves General Mammalia General Carrion General Poaceae General Deciduous Trees-Leaves/Twigs General Arthropods General Reptilia General Aves General Mammalia General Carrion Food Habits - 1
                         (DRAFT) - Environment Associations
                              Species PANTHER, FLORIDA
                                Species Id ESIS054001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

G = General A = Adult LIM = Limiting RA = Resting Adult J = Juvenile FA = Feeding Adult RJ = Resting Juvenile BA = Breeding Adult FJ = Feeding Juvenile P = Pupae L = Larvae E = Egg RL = Resting Larvae FL = Feeding Larvae
LIFESTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS G Terrestrial Features: Downed logs G G Inland Wetlands: Bogs G Coastal Features: Vegetated offshore islands G Terrestrial Features: Depressions G Terrestrial Features: Downed logs G G Inland Wetlands: Bogs G Coastal Features: Vegetated offshore islands G Terrestrial Features: Depressions Environment Associations - 1
                               (DRAFT) - Life History
                              Species PANTHER, FLORIDA
                                Species Id ESIS054001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



LIFE HISTORY

FOOD HABITS: Panthers are carnivorous. They hunt by stalking their prey until close enough to pounce on it, grabbing the throat or back of the neck (06,09,20,28). A panther will cover the prey that cannot be entirely consumed with brush and leaves and return to it as long as it is palatable (06,25,26,27,28). It is known that carrion was consumed in a Dec. 23, 1979 road kill by the presence of blow-fly eggs in the examined stomach contents (04). It is not known how frequently these meals are eaten. Hunters in the western U.S. report that mountain lions (F.c. spp.) kill every 3 to 4 days (06,25). The carcass of a 44 kg subadult male, confiscated in 1978 in Homestead, FL was examined. The stomach contained 770 g. of hair and pieces of bone from white- tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and armadillo (Dasypus novemcintus), leaves of wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) and bald cypress (Taxodium ascendens) and an unidentified monocot, either a grass or a sedge. Most likely the monocot was eaten deliberately, but the other leaves were probably ingested incidental to the food items (29). When the contents of three other panthers were analyzed from south Florida, the most important food item based on all four above mentioned was armadillo. Also all of the stomachs contained 3 to 6 grams of grass (Graminae) (04). Along with the principal food of the panther being white-tailed deer and armadillo as a buffer prey species, they will take other prey of suitable size; wild hogs, raccoon (02,05), a variety of other small mammals, birds (06,20), insects, reptiles (06, 11,30,31), and possibly domestic livestock (06,09,17,32,33). HOME RANGE/TERRITORY: A full scale radio telemetry project was begun in January 1981. As of June 30, 1982, 7 panthers had been monitored with radio collars a total of 584 times. Results indicate the home ranges of males average 301 sq. km (range 181-583) and of females 104 sq. km (range 78-129). There is considerable overlap in ranges, but the animals have never been located together with the exception of one female that was located with 2 males during Feb. of 1982. Individuals moved as much as 20 miles overnight or stayed in the same location for a week or more. They frequently crossed highways or swam canals from one tree-island to another. When approached by humans, they either remained still or tried to circle around behind the approaching people. They appeared to become accustomed to continual noises in their environment such as rock quarrying operations, highway traffic, and air traffic noise. They tended to move toward wildfires and stayed around recent burns for several days. The field search data indicated the presence of 3 adult males and 2 adult females in the Fakahatchee Strand; 3 adult males, 1 adult female in the Big Cypress Preserve, and 2 adult males, 2 adult females and 1 subadult female in Everglades National Park (04). Refer to Mcbride (41), for a specific update on these family unit distributions and numbers. PERIODICITY: It has been shown that panthers appear to move as much in the daytime as at night during the winter, but in the summer they did not Life History - 1 (DRAFT) - Life History Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 move at all in the daytime (04). MIGRATION PATTERNS: This is a nonmigratory species. COVER/SHELTER REQUIREMENTS: It is believed that the panther requires large expanses of "undisturbed habitat without human interference" (18). REPRODUCTIVE SITE REQUIREMENTS: Young panthers are born and nursed in dens, under logs, in caves, and in Florida, probably in dense thickets and fallen timber (19,20). REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: Panthers probably do not start to breed until about 3 years old (19). Peak breeding season is December through February (02,04). The adults are promiscuous (19). Information from western subspecies shows that females start the courtship and mating act (06,17,33). Males will fight for the first breeding privileges. Copulation is then followed by subsequent unions (not in a sexual manner) with other males (06,17,28). The gestation period is approximated at 90 days (02). Up to 6 kittens are born to mature females about every 2 to 3 years, but most panther families that have been seen contained only 2 to 4 young (02,19,04). Kittens are yellowish-brown with darker spots and have blue eyes (05). They weigh 1/2 to 1 lb. when born (17), and can leave the den at 6 weeks of age. This is when they weigh 6.63 to 7.73 lbs. (15). They gain up to 30-45 lbs. at 6 months and may double this as yearlings (17). PARENTAL CARE: Two or three kittens from a single litter of the Florida panther survive to take the first hunting trip, which is taken at 3 months of age. The young stay close to the mother for about 2 years. At this time the family bond breaks (37). By now the young adults are about two-thirds their full size and are able to hunt for themselves and are sexually mature (38). POPULATION BIOLOGY: It appears that the panther is a relatively long-lived animal in the wild. Using tooth wear as an indicator of age, the oldest specimens of the 11 animals handled by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission biologists were estimated to be 12 years old (02). Field research data indicates the presence of 3 adult males, 2 adult females in the Fakahatchee Strand, 3 adult males, 1 adult female and 1 subadult female in the Big Cypress Preserve, and 2 adult males, 2 adult females and 1 subadult female in the Everglades National Park. Based on these data, available habitat, the multiple land-use concept and McBride's study (41) of this area it is estimated there are about 30 panthers remaining in south Florida (04). The sex ratio appears to be between 50:50 and 60:40, favoring males. The sex ratio of 5 dead animals (4 roadkills and 1 illegal kill) was 60:40. Of 8 live captured animals it was 62:38 and based on Life History - 2 (DRAFT) - Life History Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 field signs of 15 animals 53:47. Eighty to 90 percent of the population is in the adult age class between 6 to 12 years old (04). SPECIES INTERRELATIONSHIPS: It appears that panthers depend on deer populations for food and that natural deer populations depend on predation by panthers to control herd densities (19). It would seem that this function is somewhat taken over by competition with human hunting. OTHER LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTORS: Identifying characteristics of a panther are tracks, scrapes and sounds. Panther tracks - Panthers leave distinctive tracks that can be identified. This is based on tracks that were observed and measured in Florida. The characteristics are the size and shape of the track as a whole, the absence of claw marks and the size and shape of the heel pad. The tracks consist of 4 toe marks in a semi-circle ahead of the imprint of a ball pad. The claws are encased in a sheath and do not show in a normal track. In adult panthers the heel pad may be from 50 to 70 mm on a forefoot and from 48 to 60 mm on a hind foot and show 3 lobes and 2 distinct indentations in the posterior region. The track is asymmetrical with the second digit advanced. The widest digital pad is seldom more than 44 percent of the width of the heel pad. Tracks of the forefeet are broader than those of the hind feet, so when walking the hind foot is placed in the imprint made by the fore paw. The smallest track of a free ranging panther is 70 mm which is larger than the largest bobcat tracks. Panther kittens, when they leave the den at 6 weeks, have a hind pad track approximately 35 mm in width. These tracks are normally found with those of their mother (05,15). Scrapes - Panthers make scrapes by pushing up a small mound of dirt and debris with short backward raking motions. This is done with the hind feet. These are approximately 15.24 cm (6 inch) scrapes and are usually backed up against some object such as a palmetto bush or fallen log. The mound is urinated or defecated upon. Panthers are mainly solitary animals and it is thought these scrapes act as markers for panthers to keep up with other panthers (05). Sounds - Adult panthers are usually silent, but they are capable of most gradations and tones of the domestic cat only louder. This includes purring, meowing, spitting and caterwauling which is reputed to sound like a woman screaming (05). Life History - 3
                           (DRAFT) - Management Practices
                              Species PANTHER, FLORIDA
                                Species Id ESIS054001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Beneficial Controlling/Removing Nonnative Vegetation Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Boating Activities Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Off-Road Vehicles Beneficial Restricting/regulating human disturbance of populations Beneficial Maintaining/Controlling Water Flow Beneficial Developing/maintaining/protecting wetlands Beneficial Controlling water levels Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Mining Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Road Maintainance Actions Beneficial Maintaining undisturbed/undeveloped areas Beneficial Restricting/regulating human use of habitats Beneficial Land Acquisition Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Pesticide Use Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Agricultural Practice Beneficial Suppressing wildfire Beneficial Prescribed/controlled burning of habitat Beneficial Maintaining Early Stages of Succession Beneficial Stocking captive-reared wild-strain animals Beneficial Maintaining Sperm/Seed Banks Beneficial Disease Control Measures Beneficial Restricting Poaching Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Noncommercial Harvest Beneficial Transplanting wild animals Adverse Subsistence Hunting/Fishing/Trapping Existing Subsistence Hunting/Fishing/Trapping Adverse Incidental Capturing/Killing Existing Incidental Capturing/Killing Adverse Harassment/Vandalism/Indiscriminate Killing Existing Harassment/Vandalism/Indiscriminate Killing Adverse Poaching Existing Poaching Adverse Sport Hunting/Fishing Existing Sport Hunting/Fishing Adverse Off Road Vehicles Existing Off Road Vehicles Adverse Food Supply Reduction Existing Food Supply Reduction Adverse Low Gene Pool Existing Low Gene Pool Adverse Disease Existing Disease Adverse Gas/Oil Development Existing Gas/Oil Development Adverse Surface Mines Existing Surface Mines Adverse Rural Residential/Industrial Areas Existing Rural Residential/Industrial Areas Adverse Recreational development Existing Recreational development Management Practices - 1 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Adverse Highway/Railroads Existing Highway/Railroads Adverse Soil compaction by heavy equipment in mine areas Existing Soil compaction by heavy equipment in mine areas Adverse Draining wetlands, marshes, ponds, lakes Existing Draining wetlands, marshes, ponds, lakes Adverse Strip mining Existing Strip mining Adverse Water Level Fluctuation Existing Water Level Fluctuation Adverse Dredging Existing Dredging Adverse Competition Existing Competition Adverse Predator control Existing Predator control Adverse Grazing Existing Grazing Adverse Existing Adverse Forest Alteration Existing Forest Alteration Adverse Harvesting Existing Harvesting Beneficial Controlling/Removing Nonnative Vegetation Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Boating Activities Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Off-Road Vehicles Beneficial Restricting/regulating human disturbance of populations Beneficial Maintaining/Controlling Water Flow Beneficial Developing/maintaining/protecting wetlands Beneficial Controlling water levels Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Mining Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Road Maintainance Actions Beneficial Maintaining undisturbed/undeveloped areas Beneficial Restricting/regulating human use of habitats Beneficial Land Acquisition Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Pesticide Use Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Agricultural Practice Beneficial Suppressing wildfire Beneficial Prescribed/controlled burning of habitat Beneficial Maintaining Early Stages of Succession Beneficial Stocking captive-reared wild-strain animals Beneficial Maintaining Sperm/Seed Banks Beneficial Disease Control Measures Beneficial Restricting Poaching Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Noncommercial Harvest Beneficial Transplanting wild animals Adverse Subsistence Hunting/Fishing/Trapping Existing Subsistence Hunting/Fishing/Trapping Adverse Incidental Capturing/Killing Existing Incidental Capturing/Killing Management Practices - 2 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Adverse Harassment/Vandalism/Indiscriminate Killing Existing Harassment/Vandalism/Indiscriminate Killing Adverse Poaching Existing Poaching Adverse Sport Hunting/Fishing Existing Sport Hunting/Fishing Adverse Off Road Vehicles Existing Off Road Vehicles Adverse Food Supply Reduction Existing Food Supply Reduction Adverse Low Gene Pool Existing Low Gene Pool Adverse Disease Existing Disease Adverse Gas/Oil Development Existing Gas/Oil Development Adverse Surface Mines Existing Surface Mines Adverse Rural Residential/Industrial Areas Existing Rural Residential/Industrial Areas Adverse Recreational development Existing Recreational development Adverse Highway/Railroads Existing Highway/Railroads Adverse Soil compaction by heavy equipment in mine areas Existing Soil compaction by heavy equipment in mine areas Adverse Draining wetlands, marshes, ponds, lakes Existing Draining wetlands, marshes, ponds, lakes Adverse Strip mining Existing Strip mining Adverse Water Level Fluctuation Existing Water Level Fluctuation Adverse Dredging Existing Dredging Adverse Competition Existing Competition Adverse Predator control Existing Predator control Adverse Grazing Existing Grazing Adverse Existing Adverse Forest Alteration Existing Forest Alteration Adverse Harvesting Existing Harvesting COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - It appears that the panther population has been gradually destroyed by advancing civilization since the white man came to this Management Practices - 3 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 country. This process started with early settlers attempting to kill panthers at every opportunity because of losses of livestock and fear of the animal itself (04,17). "As early as 1832, even before Florida became a state, a law was passed which permitted a panther bounty to be paid by the county courts. Under this rule, the local courts decided on the amount to be paid. An 1887 Florida law authorized a statewide 5 dollar bounty for panther scalps. Then when deer were nearly eradicated in lower Florida in the 1930's to control the fever tick, panthers strayed from the relative safety of their normal haunts in search of prey. This resulted in more hunting pressure by ranchers and almost led to the final doom of the animal" (05). Until relatively recently, the Big Cypress Swamp-Everglades Region was impenetrable to man. The first road through the area was built in 1928 (Tamiami Trail-U.S. Hwy 41). In the late 1940's and early 1950's the entire region was logged (04). Partial protection was given to the then rare panther in 1950. At this time panthers could be hunted only during open season for deer. Animals that were found destroying livestock could be taken by special permit at any time. In 1958 the panther was given complete legal protection by Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and removed from the native game animal list (05,06,18,19). The logging, associated with accompanying wildfires, created ideal habitat for the white-tailed deer. The herd expanded until the forest canopy began closing in again in the mid-1960's, at which time die-offs occurred. It is reasonable to assume that the panther population reached its highest point since the early 20th Century during this period. With the construction of Alligator Alley (State Hwy 84) through the middle of the area in 1966-67, the area became easily accessible (04). In March of 1967, the Florida panther was included as Endangered on the U.S. Department of Interior's first list of Endangered Wildlife (FR 48:4001) (17). In 1979, the State Florida Panther Act made killing a panther a felony. The Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 also gave full protection (04,20). Several major access roads have been built off of Alligator Alley at this time. Surface mines for rock quarrying activities and a vast system of canals, along with ditching, diking and backpumping of water has caused a general drying in the region. This in turn allows more off-road vehicles to go more places (04,12). The human population has increased several hundred percent (04). Agricultural activities and the removal of natural vegetation, all pose a great threat to the Florida panther (12). The continued development of the Big Cypress and Everglades region has resulted in deterioration of the quality of this area (02) and a shrinkage of wilderness character (04). This habitat loss probably continues to depress the panther population below its potential carrying capacity (06,18). Although the surface area of Big Cypress is publicly owned, the mineral rights remain in private ownership. Substantial quantities of oil appear to underly these lands (02). Hunting is prohibited in the Everglades National Park, but the Big Cypress Preserve is heavily hunted using off-road vehicles and dogs (12). This has been thought to pose a threat to the existing panther population also (12,17,19,06,21,22,23). Panthers have unfortunately been killed with firearms (6 animals from 1978 to 1985 and 1 animal overdosed during a capture attempt for Management Practices - 4 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 research purposes) (41), but even those incidents have been outnumbered in recent years by those that have been killed by automobile accidents (11 animals from 1978 to 1985) (12,19,24,41). In fact, during one recent 18 month period, 3 panthers were killed by motor vehicles (02). The Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission also realizes that the Endangered status of the Florida panther is largely due to past unreasonable fear/persecution and to degradation of the panther habitat that continues as a result of rapid human population growth. Factors that additionally threaten recovery of panthers are occasional malicious killing, increased highway traffic in critical panther ranges, continued industrial, agricultural and residential development, and accelerated public use in natural areas that remain crucial to the panthers survival (i.e., multiple land-use concept) (24). It has been postulated however, that due to the extended hunting pressure within panther habitat and poor water level control, the white-tail deer population is insufficient to adequately support a healthy panther population. In addition to the man-made pressures of habitat loss and human overuse, the panther is treatened with some serious biological factors. The panther population in the Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve and Big Cypress National Preserve show the classic symptoms of an undernourished wildlife population. The population is sparse, aging and stressed. When the prey base is insufficient, young animals are more susceptible to disease (39). There is a prevalence of high levels of antibodies of feline panleukopenia virus in tested Florida panthers. Feline panleukopenia, or feline distemper, is a highly contagious viral disease that affects young or weakened felines. Once infected, the antibodies remain in the cat's bloodstream providing immunity for life. The presence of these antibodies in 85 percent of samples taken from 20 individual panthers indicates a high occurrence of the disease among young populations. This virus is often fatal to felines suffering from nutritional deficiencies (40). In addition to these problems, Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission veterinarian Melody Roelke has found that tests on three male panthers showed abnormalities in more than 90 percent of their sperm cells making them incapable of breeding. APPROVED PLAN: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1987. Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) Recovery Plan. Prepared by the Florida Panther Interagency Committee for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 75 pp. The Florida Panther Recovery Plan identifies 3 major tasks to be undertaken to reach the recovery goal of preventing the animals extinction and reestablishing viable populations in as much of the former range as possible. The first main task is to maintain the existing population by protecting and managing the essential habitat and range. To insure Management Practices - 5 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 proper habitat is protected there needs to be continued studies on movements, food habits and population dynamics; and a program must be established to monitor existing populations and habitats. Although not specifically stated in the Recovery Plan management of the panthers essential habitat may include: 1) Maintaing early stages of succession through prescribed burning which would aid in the expansion of the deer herd/prey base. However, fire control may be necessary if fires are unnaturally started under potentially damaging conditions (i.e., if it is to dry and the thin soil layer may burn off the limestone bedrock). 2) Simply leaving the panther alone may be helpful to its recovery. That is, limiting human access to essential habitat by: a) Restricting off-road vehicles (for recreational and resource management purposes). b) Restricting airboating activities (for recreational, hunting, and research purposes). c) Restricting development such as agricultural, recreational, urban, rural, and mineral (rock quarring and oil/gas development). Of the development that already exists, the controlling of agricultural practices such as pesticide use, the controlling of road maintenance activities, the restricting of hunting camps, and in general, land use zoning or acquisition of essential habitat may be desirable. 3) The panthers essential habitat may require some wetland management objectives including the maintenance of water flows and the water table to duplicate historical conditions. This may prevent unnatural/untimely flooding or droughts which may alter the vegetation regime and negatively impact the deer herd (i.e., decrease deer food supply availability, restrict deer movement, concentration of the herd may facilitate epidemics, and some may drown). 4) In addition to maintaing the existing population through management of essential habitat the restricting of "take" either directly (i.e., poaching) or indirectly (i.e., initial compliance with Section 7 of the ESA, strict enforcement of the Endangered Species Act and Florida State Statutes) is necessary. The second major task that needs to be accomplished is to improve public opinion and behavior regarding the management of Florida panthers. This task can be accomplished through public education on the enforcement of existing regulations. The third task is to establish populations where possible. To reestablish panthers, a captive breeding program must be prepared along with a priority restocking plan and a monitoring program to evaluate the results. At present one male and two female Florida panthers are in capitivity. Although plans exist for a captive breeding program, the State of Florida may consider maintaining a Management Practices - 6 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 sperm bank in the interim of the captive breeding project design. With the latest discovery of feline panleukopenia at a high frequency in this species, disease control measures may be beneficial if incorporated into ongoing radio collaring research projects or into the captive breeding program itself. Some actions towards the recovery and preservation of the Florida panther not identified in the Recovery Plan include: The Governor of Florida, his Cabinet, and several Senators have initiated and supported the "Save the Everglades Program" in which the Florida panther is a focal point. The proposed "unraveling" of South Florida's "plumbing network" of canals to restore natural water flows, in cooperation with the State Water Management District, COE, and NPS, should alleviate the problems of untimely flooding from water releases and untimely severe droughts that in the past have resulted in "mercy kills" of deer (because of starvation, drowning and disease). Several water channels, plugs, pumping stations and water control structures are being modified at a cost of several million dollars. The Florida Department of Natural Resources and Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission have considered the possibility of building "islands" in the water conservation areas to provide dry ground for deer and decrease the impact of the high water levels. Private contractors have donated time and fill at a cost of several thousand dollars to build some of these structures. Also proposed is the installation of "underpasses" for panther crossings under Alligator Alley to reduce the chance of highway mortality at a cost of several million dollars. Yet another action to decrease road-kills is the decrease of speed limits on Alligator Alley in areas of highest frequency of panther road-kills. All of these programs, and the panther in general, are supported by several local, national and international conservation organizations. Management Practices - 7
                                   (DRAFT) - References
                                 Species PANTHER, FLORIDA
                                  Species Id ESIS054001
                                      Date 14 MAR 96



     

References

***** REFERENCES FOR ALL NARRATIVES EXCEPT N-OCCURRENCE ***** 01 Bangs, O. 1899. The Florida Puma. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 13:15- 17. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. The Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 02 Naggiar, M. 1982. The Florida Panther. FL Wildl. Sept-Oct 1982. 03 Goldman, E.A. 1946. Classification of the Races of the Puma. Pp 175-302. In: S.P. Young and E.A. Goldman. The Puma, Mysterious American Cat. Amer. Wildl. Inst., Wash., D.C. 358 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. The Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 04 Belden, R.C. 1982. Florida Panther Recovery Plan Implementation A 1982 Progress Report. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm. Wildlife Research Lab, Gainesville. 05 Belden, R.C. 1977. If you see a panther. FL Wildl. Sept-Oct. Pp 33-40. 06 Woodard, D. 1980. Selected Vertebrate Endangered Species of the Seacoast of the United States--The Florida Panther. USFWS. FWS/ OBS-80/01.46. 07 Audubon, J.J. and J. Bachman. 1851. The Viviparous Quadrupeds of North America. 3 Vols. George R. Lockwood. New York. In: 06. 08 Merriam, C.H. 1901. Preliminary Revision of the Pumas (Felis concolor group). Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci. 3:577-600. In 05. 09 Hamilton, W.J. 1943. The Mammals of Eastern United States: an Account of Recent Land Mammals Occurring East of the Mississippi. Comstock Publ. Assoc. Cornell Univ. Press. Ithaca, NY. 432 pp. In: 06. 10 Hall, E.R. and K.R. Kelson. 1959. The Mammals of North America. 2 Vols. Ronald Press. New York. 1083 pp. In: 06. 11 Hughes, W. 1965. Florida's Wild Cats. FL Wildl. 18(9):16-17. In: 06. 12 Belden, R.C. 1978. The Florida Panther Recovery Plan. Florida Panther Recovery Team. USFWS. 13 Cory, C.B. 1896. Hunting and Fishing in Florida. Estes and Lauriat Boston. 304 pp. In: 12. 14 Hollister, N. 1911. The Louisiana Puma. Proc. Biol. Surv. Wash. 24:175-178. In: 12. 15 Belden, R.C. 1978. How to Recognize Panther Tracks. Proc. SE Assn. Game and Fish Commissioners Conf. Hot Springs, VA. 16 Nelson, E.W. and E.A. Goldman. 1939. List of the Pumas with Three Described as New. J. Mamm. 10:345-350. In: 12. 17 Turnipseed, T. 1982. Endangered Species Notebook. USDI/USFWS Atlanta, GA. 18 Layne, J.N. and M.N. McCauley. 1976. Biological Overview of the Florida Panther. In: Proc. of a FL Panther Conference and Workshop. March 1976. FL Aud. Soc. In: 06. 19 Layne, J.N. (ed.) 1978. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida. 6 Vols. Vol.1 Mammals. Univ. Press of FL. Gainesville, FL. Pp. 13- 14. 20 Hendry, L.C., T.M. Goodwin, and R.F. Labisky. 1980. Florida's Vanishing Wildlife. FL Coop. Ext. Serv. Pp 60-61. 21 Laycock, G. 1969. America's Endangered Wildlife. Norton, NY. References - 1 (DRAFT) - References Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 226 pp. In: 06. 22 Nowak, R.M. and R. McBride. 1973. Feasibility of a Study on the Florida Panther. Report to World Wildl. Fund. (Xerox) 13 pp. In: 06. 23 Anon. 1973. Florida Panther in Imminent Danger. World Wildl. News. 1(3):3-4. In: 06. 24 Logan, T. 1983. Florida Panther Recovery: A Status Report to the Governor and Cabinet, July 7, 1983. Bureau of Wildl. Research. FL Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm. Tallahassee, FL. 25 Young, S.P. and E.A. Goldman. 1964. The Puma, Mysterious American Cat. Dover Publ., Inc. New York. 358 pp. In: 06. 26 Goin, O.B. 1948. Cat of a Dozen Names. Fauna 10(4):101-105. In: 06. 27 Allen, E.R. 1950. Notes on the Florida Panther, Felis concolor coryi Bangs. J. Mamm. 31:279-280. In: 06. 28 Lowery, G.H., Jr. 1974. The Mammals of Louisiana and its Adjacent Waters. Louisiana State Univ. Press. Baton Rouge, LA. 565 pp. In: 06. 29 Belden, R.C. and D.J. Forrester. 1980. A Specimen of Felis concolor coryi from Florida. J. Mamm. Vol. 61 No.1 (Feb). Pp 160- 161. 30 Smith, G. 1968. The Florida Panther. FL Wildl. 21(8):30-31. In: 06. 31 Tinsley, J.B. 1970. The Florida Panther. Great Outdoors Publ. Co. St. Petersburg, FL. 60 pp. In: 06. 32 True, F.W. 1891. The Puma, or American Lion: Felis concolor of Linneaus. In Ann. Rep. U.S. Natl. Mus. Year ending June 30, 1889. Pp. 591-609. In: 06. 33 Rodgers, D.P. and J.P. Crowder. 1974. Threatened Wildlife of South Florida. South Florida Environ. Proj. Ecol. Rep. DI-SFEP-74- 25. 34 pp. In: 06. 34 McPherson, B.F. 1973. Vegetation Map of Southern Parts of Subareas A and C, Big Cypress Swamp, Florida. USGS. 35 Gunderson, L.H. and L.L. Loope. 1982. A Survey and Inventory of the Plant Communities in the Raccoon Point Area, Big Cypress National Preserve. South Florida Research Center Report T-665. 36 pp. 36 Palmer, D. 1983. Personal communication. USFWS Biologist, Jacksonville, FL. 37 LaHart, D. 1973. Florida's Endangered Dozen. Florida Wildlife Magazine. 38 Moore, N. 1979. Florida Panther, If Animals Could Talk. School Board of Pinellas County, Florida. 39 Minutes of the Florida Panther Technical Advisory Council Meeting. June 12, 1984. 40 Roelke, M.E., E.R. Jacobson, G.V. Kallias and D.J. Forrester. 1984. Unpublished paper. Medical Management and Biomedical Findings on the Florida Panther, Felis concolor coryi. 41 McBride, R. 1985. Population Status of the Florida Panther in Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve. NPS Contract No. RFP 5280-84-04. 58 pp. 42 Maehr, D. 1987. Pers. commun. FL Game and Fresh Water Fish Comm., Naples, FL. References - 2 (DRAFT) - References Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 ***** REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY ***** 01 Belden, R.C. 1979. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. Florida Panther Recovery Team. USFWS. 02 Goldman, E.A. 1946. Classification of the Races of Puma. Pp 175- 302. In: S.P. Young and E.A. Goldman. The Puma, Mysterious American Cat. Amer. Wildl. Inst. Washington, D.C. 358 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1979. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 03 Hall, E.R. and K.R. Kelson. 1959. The Mammals of North America. 2 Vols. Ronald Press. New York. 1083 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1979. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 04 Logan, T. 1983. Florida Panther Recovery: A Status Report to the Governor and Cabinet. July 7, 1983. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 05 Belden, R.C. 1982. Florida Panther Recovery Plan Implementation. A 1982 Progress Report. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Wildlife Research Lab. Gainesville, FL. 06 Belden, R.C. 1983. Personal communication. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Wildlife Research Lab.; 4005 South Main Street; Gainesville, FL; 32601. 904-376-6481. 07 Hydrologic Unit Map of the United States, adapted from the U.S. Geological Survey. 1980. 08 Ecoregions and Land Surface Forms map. 1982. USFWS, FWS/OBS-89/ 09. 09 Layne, J.N. (ed.) 1978. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida, Mammals Vol.1. University Presses of Florida. Gainesville, FL. 10 Layne, J.N. and M.M. McCauley. 1976. Biological Overview of the Florida Panther. Pp. 5-45. In: Proceedings of the Florida Panther Conference (P.C.H. Pritchard, ed.) Florida Audubon Society and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Orlando, FL. 121 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 11 Lewis, J.C. 1969. Evidence of Mountain Lions in the Ozarks and Adjacent areas, 1948-1968. J. Mamm. 50:371-372. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 12 Lewis, J.C. 1970. Evidence of Mountain Lions in the Ozark, Boston and Ouachita Mountains. Proc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci. 1968. Pp. 182- 184. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 13 Lowery, G.H., Jr. 1974. The Mammals of Louisiana and its Adjacent Waters. Louisiana State University Press. Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Pp. 565. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 14 McCauley, M.N. 1977. Current Population and Distribution Status of the Panther, Felis concolor, in Florida. Unpubl. MS Thesis, Univ. of South Florida. Tampa, FL. 58 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 15 Sealander, J.A. 1956. A Provisional Check-list and Key to the Mammals of Arkansas (with annotations). Amer. Midl. Nat. 56:38-41. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 16 Sealander, J.A. 1979. A Guide to Arkansas Mammals. River Road References - 3 (DRAFT) - References Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 Press. Conway, Arkansas. 313 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 17 Sealander, J.A. and P.S. Gibson. 1973. Status of the Mountain Lion in Arkansas. Proc. Arkansas Acad. Sci. 27:38-41. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 18 Bangs, O. 1899. The Land Mammals of Peninsular Florida and the Coast Region of Georgia. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 23:157-235. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 19 Woodard, D.W. 1980. Selected Vertebrate Endangered Species of the Seacoast of the United States - The Florida Panther. USFWS, Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-80/01.46. 20 Lowman, G.E. 1975. A Survey of Endangered, Threatened, Rare, Status Undetermined, Peripheral and Unique Mammals of the Southeastern National Forest and Grasslands. USDA. Forest Service. Atlanta, GA. 121 pp. In: Woodard, D.W. 1980. Selected Vertebrate Endangered Species of the Seacoast of the United States- The Florida Panther. USFWS, Biological Services Program FWS/OBS- 80/01.46. 21 Waters, J.A. 1984. The Florida Panther, Living on the Edge. Fl. Wildl. 1984(4):22-27. 22 Belden, R.C., W.B. Frankenberger, S.T. Schwikert and R.H. Williams. 1985. Status of the Panther in Flagler and Volusia Counties, Florida. Endang. Species Annual Performance Report, Study E1-09II-E-1. 8 pp. 23 Belden, R.C. 1985. Annual Performance Report; Panther Population Survey. Study No. E1-09II-E-1. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. Tallahassee, FL. 52 pp. 24 McBride, R. 1985. Population Status of the Florida Panther in Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve. NPS Contract No. RFP 5280-84-04. 58 pp. ***** REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY ***** 01 Belden, R.C. 1979. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. Florida Panther Recovery Team. USFWS. 02 Goldman, E.A. 1946. Classification of the Races of Puma. Pp 175- 302. In: S.P. Young and E.A. Goldman. The Puma, Mysterious American Cat. Amer. Wildl. Inst. Washington, D.C. 358 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1979. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 03 Hall, E.R. and K.R. Kelson. 1959. The Mammals of North America. 2 Vols. Ronald Press. New York. 1083 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1979. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 04 Logan, T. 1983. Florida Panther Recovery: A Status Report to the Governor and Cabinet. July 7, 1983. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 05 Belden, R.C. 1982. Florida Panther Recovery Plan Implementation. A 1982 Progress Report. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Wildlife Research Lab. Gainesville, FL. 06 Belden, R.C. 1983. Personal communication. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Wildlife Research Lab.; 4005 South Main Street; Gainesville, FL; 32601. 904-376-6481. 07 Hydrologic Unit Map of the United States, adapted from the U.S. References - 4 (DRAFT) - References Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 Geological Survey. 1980. 08 Ecoregions and Land Surface Forms map. 1982. USFWS, FWS/OBS-89/ 09. 09 Layne, J.N. (ed.) 1978. Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida, Mammals Vol.1. University Presses of Florida. Gainesville, FL. 10 Layne, J.N. and M.M. McCauley. 1976. Biological Overview of the Florida Panther. Pp. 5-45. In: Proceedings of the Florida Panther Conference (P.C.H. Pritchard, ed.) Florida Audubon Society and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Orlando, FL. 121 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 11 Lewis, J.C. 1969. Evidence of Mountain Lions in the Ozarks and Adjacent areas, 1948-1968. J. Mamm. 50:371-372. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 12 Lewis, J.C. 1970. Evidence of Mountain Lions in the Ozark, Boston and Ouachita Mountains. Proc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci. 1968. Pp. 182- 184. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 13 Lowery, G.H., Jr. 1974. The Mammals of Louisiana and its Adjacent Waters. Louisiana State University Press. Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Pp. 565. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 14 McCauley, M.N. 1977. Current Population and Distribution Status of the Panther, Felis concolor, in Florida. Unpubl. MS Thesis, Univ. of South Florida. Tampa, FL. 58 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 15 Sealander, J.A. 1956. A Provisional Check-list and Key to the Mammals of Arkansas (with annotations). Amer. Midl. Nat. 56:38-41. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 16 Sealander, J.A. 1979. A Guide to Arkansas Mammals. River Road Press. Conway, Arkansas. 313 pp. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 17 Sealander, J.A. and P.S. Gibson. 1973. Status of the Mountain Lion in Arkansas. Proc. Arkansas Acad. Sci. 27:38-41. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 18 Bangs, O. 1899. The Land Mammals of Peninsular Florida and the Coast Region of Georgia. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 23:157-235. In: Belden, R.C. 1978. Florida Panther Recovery Plan. USFWS. 19 Woodard, D.W. 1980. Selected Vertebrate Endangered Species of the Seacoast of the United States - The Florida Panther. USFWS, Biological Services Program FWS/OBS-80/01.46. 20 Lowman, G.E. 1975. A Survey of Endangered, Threatened, Rare, Status Undetermined, Peripheral and Unique Mammals of the Southeastern National Forest and Grasslands. USDA. Forest Service. Atlanta, GA. 121 pp. In: Woodard, D.W. 1980. Selected Vertebrate Endangered Species of the Seacoast of the United States- The Florida Panther. USFWS, Biological Services Program FWS/OBS- 80/01.46. 21 Waters, J.A. 1984. The Florida Panther, Living on the Edge. Fl. Wildl. 1984(4):22-27. 22 Belden, R.C., W.B. Frankenberger, S.T. Schwikert and R.H. Williams. 1985. Status of the Panther in Flagler and Volusia Counties, Florida. Endang. Species Annual Performance Report, References - 5 (DRAFT) - References Species PANTHER, FLORIDA Species Id ESIS054001 Date 14 MAR 96 Study E1-09II-E-1. 8 pp. 23 Belden, R.C. 1985. Annual Performance Report; Panther Population Survey. Study No. E1-09II-E-1. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. Tallahassee, FL. 52 pp. 24 McBride, R. 1985. Population Status of the Florida Panther in Everglades National Park and Big Cypress National Preserve. NPS Contract No. RFP 5280-84-04. 58 pp. References - 6