(DRAFT) - Taxonomy
                               Species COUGAR, EASTERN
                                Species Id ESIS054008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



TAXONOMY

NAME - COUGAR, EASTERN OTHER COMMON NAMES - COUGAR, EASTERN;LION, MOUNTAIN; COUGAR; COUGAR, ADIRONDACK; PUMA; PUMA, EASTERN; PANTHER;PANTHER and EASTERN; PAINTER;CATAMOUNT ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Mammals PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - CHORDATA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - MAMMALIA, ORDER AND SUBORDER - CARNIVORA, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - FELIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - FELIS, SPECIES AND SSP - CONCOLOR, COUGUAR SCIENTIFIC NAME - FELIS CONCOLOR COUGUAR AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Eastern Cougar Felis concolor couguar Kerr, 1792 KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Mammal PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Mammalia ORDER: Carnivora FAMILY: Felidae The eastern cougar (Felis concolor couguar Kerr, 1792) is a small form with a rather broad skull and inflated nasals; fur is relatively long and shows little contrast between dorsal and ventral, has a poorly defined darkening of the muzzle, and no dappling or ridgeback (12). The eastern cougar was first called Cougar de Pensilvanie by Buffon in 1776. Kerr (1792) renamed it Felis couguar based on Buffon's description. True (1884) reassigned it to Felis concolor and Nelson and Goldman (1929) first used the present subspecific designation Felis concolor couguar. A variation in the spelling of the subspecific designation, cougar, can be found in some literature including the Canadian and Canadian Provincial lists, and the IUCN Red Data Book. This subspecies was first described among North American specimens from the northeastern United States and eastern Canada. The type specimen, from Elk County, PA, is at the U.S. National Museum. The most recent and exhaustive diagnosis of eastern cougar taxonomy is a preliminary one by James D. Lazell (12). Minnesota is not included within the range of the eastern cougar because the scientific community generally accepts that state as being within the range of F. Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 c. schorgeri, based on Jackson's (1955) revision involving 3 specimens (10). Other common names used for this species include mountain lion, cougar, Adirondack cougar (CITES), puma, eastern puma (CITES), panther, eastern panther (New Brunswick, Canada listing), painter, and catamount. Taxonomy - 2
                                  (DRAFT) - Status
                               Species COUGAR, EASTERN
                                Species Id ESIS054008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



STATUS

Coded Status Georgia; Federal Endangered Georgia; State Listed Kentucky; Federal Endangered Kentucky; State Recognized Maryland; Federal Endangered Maryland; State Recognized North Carolina; Federal Endangered North Carolina; State Listed South Carolina; Federal Endangered South Carolina; State Listed Tennessee; Federal Endangered Tennessee; State Listed Virginia; Federal Endangered Virginia; State Listed West Virginia; Federal Endangered West Virginia; State Recognized E: Federal Endangered Status - 1 (DRAFT) - Status Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 Coded Status Pest Commercial Game (Consumptive Recreational) COMMENTS ON STATUS - U.S. STATUSES AND LAWS: The eastern cougar (Felis concolor couguar) has been designated as Endangered pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (50 CFR 17.11; P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1540), as amended. The subspecies has this status wherever found in eastern North America (U.S. and Canada). Critical Habitat has not been designated. This subspecies is protected by the Lacey Act (P.L. 97-79, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) which makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, or offspring): (1) in interstate or foreign commerce if taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, or foreign law; or (2) if taken or possessed in violation of any U.S. law, treaty, or regulation or in violation of Indian tribal law. It is also unlawful to possess any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, and offspring) within the U.S. territorial or special maritime jurisdiction (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7) that is taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, foreign law, or Indian tribal law. RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCIES: USFWS -Responsible for the management/recovery, listing, and law enforcement/protection of this species. DOD -Responsible for the law enforcement/protection of this species with applicable State and Federal laws on public land under their control. Also responsible for management/recovery on Department of Defense lands. NPS -Responsible for the law enforcement/protection of this species with applicable State and Federal laws on public lands under their control. Also responsible for conservation (Nat. Park System Organic Act - 16 U.S.C. 1, 2-3)/management/recovery on National Park Service lands. Taking, possessing, or disturbing of federally listed species is prohibited on NPS lands (36 CFR 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3). USFS -Responsible for the law enforcement/protection of this species with applicable State and Federal laws on public lands under their control. Also responsible for management/recovery on Forest Service lands. The Forest Service is responsible for integrating management, protection, and conservation of federally listed species into the Forest Planning process (36 CFR 219.19 and 219.20). Status - 2 (DRAFT) - Status Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 All Federal agencies have responsibility to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by that agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of Critical Habitat (50 CFR 402), and to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of the species. STATE STATUSES AND LAWS: STATE: Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and West Virginia. DESIGNATED STATUS: Recognized Endangered ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: DE Division of Fish and Wildlife IN Department of Natural Resources; Div. of Fish and Wildlife. KY Department of Fish and Wildlife. ME Dept. of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife MD Department of Natural Resources MA Dept. of Fish., Wildl. & Recr. Vehic. MI Dept. of Natural Resources; Wildlife & Fisheries Division NH Fish and Game Commission NJ Dept. of Environmental Protection; Div. of Fish, Game and Wildlife OH Dept. Nat. Resour., Div. of Wildlife PA Game Commission RI Dept. of Environmental Management; Div. of Fish & Wildlife WV Department of Natural Resources. STATE STATUTE: DE Code Annot., Sec. 601, 602, and 604. IN Statutes Annot., Sec. 14-2-8.5-1; 310 IN Admin. Code 3-3-6. KY Rev. Stat. 150.183; 301 KY Admin. Regs. 3:061. ME Rev. Stat. Annot., Subsec. 7001, 7751-7756. MD Nat. Resour. Code Annot., Subsec. 4-2A-01 to 4-2A-09, 10-2A-01 to 10-2A-09; Code of MD Regs. 08.03.01.43, Supp. 4. MA Gen. Laws Annot. 131 Sec. 26A; Nongame Wildl. for Special Consider. in MA, Sec. I, 1983. MI Compiled Laws Annot., Subsec. 299.221 to 299.230; MI Admin. Code 299.1021 to .1028, Feb., 1983. NH Code of Admin. Rules, Fis 1001.01, 1001.02, eff. Apr. 28, 1980. NJ Admin. Code, 7:25-11.2, eff. Mar. 29, 1979. OH Admin. Code, 1501.31-23-01. PA 58 PA Code, Subsec. 147.1, 147.21. RI Gen. Laws of RI, Subsec. 20-37-1 to 20-37-5. WV Limited Author. Coop. Agreem. between USFWS & WV Dept. of Natural Resources, Sept., 1982. STATE: Connecticut, Georgia, New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia. Status - 3 (DRAFT) - Status Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 DESIGNATED STATUS: Endangered ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: CT Dept. of Environmental Conservation GA Board of Natural Resources; Dept. of Natural Resources; Game & Fish Div. NY Dept. of Environmental Conservation NC Wildlife Resources Commission SC Wildlife & Marine Resour. Dept.; Game & Freshwater Fisheries Division TN Wildlife Resources Agency VT Fish and Game Department VA Commission of Game & Inland Fisheries STATE STATUTE: CT Gen. Stat. Annot., Subsec. 26-40d, 26-40e. GA Game & Fish Code, Subsec. 27-3-130 to 27-3-132; Rules & Regs. GA, Sec. 391-4-13.09. NY 6 NY Code, Rules & Regs. 182.5. NC 15 NC Admin. Code, 10I.0003. SC Regulations 123-150. TN Wildlife Procl. No. 75-15, as amended. VT Vermont Regs. Annot. 13-79.1. VA Code of VA, Subsec. 29-230 to 29-237. STATE: West Virginia UNOFFICIAL LIST: Federally Endangered, "Special Animal List", Wildlife Resour. Div., WV Dept. of Nat. Resour. STATE: District of Columbia DESIGNATED STATUS: None. INTERNATIONAL STATUSES, TREATIES, AND AGREEMENTS: Felis concolor couguar is listed in Appendix I of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). It is listed as Endangered in the IUCN Red Book, Part I (1982) at the subspecific level as well as in the 1986 IUCN Red List of Threatened Animals. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) has listed the eastern cougar as an Endangered mammal. New Brunswick maintains a Provincial List (Endangered Species Act, Chap. E-9.1) containing F. c. couguar. ECONOMIC STATUSES: The cougar was feared and persecuted by many settlers of early America partly because of occasional depredation on livestock. The cougar was taken for bounty and had some value as a game species. 73/01/15:38 FR 01521/ - Proposed rule 73/01/22:38 FR 02178/ - Corrections to proposed rule 73/06/04:38 FR 14678/ - Listed as Endangered 79/05/21:44 FR 29566/29577 - Notice 5-year review 85/07/22:50 FR 29901/29909 - Notice 5-year review 87/07/07:52 FR 25522/ - Notice of five year review completion Status - 4
     

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS

HABITAT - TERRESTRIAL TERRESTRIAL INLAND AQUATIC SOCIETY OF AMERICAN FORESTRY TYPES SAF TYPE STAGE CLOSURE shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth White spruce balsam fir shrub--seedling White spruce balsam fir young tree White spruce balsam fir mature tree White spruce balsam fir Old Growth Longleaf Pine shrub--seedling Longleaf Pine young tree Longleaf Pine mature tree Longleaf Pine Old Growth Loblolly Pine-Shortleaf Pine shrub--seedling Loblolly Pine-Shortleaf Pine young tree Loblolly Pine-Shortleaf Pine mature tree Loblolly Pine-Shortleaf Pine Old Growth Shortleaf Pine-Oak shrub--seedling Shortleaf Pine-Oak young tree Shortleaf Pine-Oak mature tree Shortleaf Pine-Oak Old Growth shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth shrub--seedling young tree mature tree Old Growth Aspen-paper birch shrub--seedling Aspen-paper birch young tree Aspen-paper birch mature tree Aspen-paper birch Old Growth LAND USE - Deciduous Forest Land Evergreen Forest Land Mixed Forest Land Forested Wetland Nonforested Wetland NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY CODES NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Habitat Associations - 1 Palustrine SS Palustrine FO COMMENTS ON HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS - The eastern cougar (Felis concolor couguar) is one of 27 subspecies of cougar (20) that once inhabited almost every terrestrial and forested aquatic habitat from the southern tier of Canadian provinces to the southern tip of South America. There are few, if any, vegetative or physiographic limits to their habitat as long as deer-sized mammals are plentiful for food. The preferred prey species of the eastern cougar is the white-tailed deer, which itself is extremely adaptable to habitat, but is most plentiful in areas with recent forest disturbance or interspersed with agricultural crops. Deer are now plentiful in most extensively forested areas in the East, thus there presently are few food resource limitations for the eastern cougar (20,04). Human disturbance, per se, does not appear to be detrimental to cougars as long as they are not killed. Nevertheless, remoteness and inaccessibility are habitat features that may be necessary to prevent human persecution (20,04). They spend each day in some thick cover, in a cave, under an overhang, or in a rock fissure, then move on to some similar site for the next day's rest (16). Habitat Associations - 2
                                (DRAFT) - Food Habits
                               Species COUGAR, EASTERN
                                Species Id ESIS054008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



FOOD HABITS

TROPHIC LEVEL - CARNIVORE LIFESTAGE FOOD FOOD PART General Poaceae General Deciduous Shrubs-Flowers/Fruit/Seed General Arthropods General Fish General Aves General Mammalia Food Habits - 1
                         (DRAFT) - Environment Associations
                               Species COUGAR, EASTERN
                                Species Id ESIS054008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

G = General A = Adult LIM = Limiting RA = Resting Adult J = Juvenile FA = Feeding Adult RJ = Resting Juvenile BA = Breeding Adult FJ = Feeding Juvenile P = Pupae L = Larvae E = Egg RL = Resting Larvae FL = Feeding Larvae
LIFESTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS G Terrestrial Features: Caves, dry G Terrestrial Features: Cliffs/ledges G Terrestrial Features: Rock outcrops Environment Associations - 1
                               (DRAFT) - Life History
                               Species COUGAR, EASTERN
                                Species Id ESIS054008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



LIFE HISTORY

FOOD HABITS: Little is known of the life history of the eastern cougar; therefore much of the following information has been extrapolated from studies of other subspecies. Although the eastern cougar opportunistically takes a wide range of food, its favorite is the deer (24), probably constituting 60-80 percent of the total consumption (16). Twenty-five species of wild mammals, 8 domestic mammals, 4 birds, insects, fish, grasses, and berries are reported as cougar food in the United States and Canada (16). Grasses and berries are consumed by most members of the cat family and probably have no nutritional value but rather serve a medicinal purpose. Cougars stalk (and sometimes ambush) their prey and characteristically carry or drag an uneaten portion to cover where they cover it with leaves and twigs (16). Cougars will return to these caches until the kill is entirely consumed, begins to spoil, or another kill is made. Lactation lasts for 3 months and kittens can eat meat at 6 weeks of age (16). Kittens follow their mothers to a kill after about 2 months of age (09) and accompany her on hunting trips at 5-6 months of age. Juveniles can kill for themselves by 1 year of age but sometimes stay with their mothers and depend on her for most of their food up to 22 months of age (16). HOME RANGE/TERRITORY: Adult cougars are usually solitary except during courtship and when rearing young (17). Siblings may stay together for 2-3 months after separation from their mothers. Juveniles of both sexes become transients unattached to any home area and may remain in this status for several years until they find a vacant territory (17). One juvenile transient is known to have traveled more than 161 km from its tag site (16). Resident adults mark the critical parts of their territories, such as trails, high ridges, and crossings, with scrapes or scratch-hills, topped with urine or feces, as visual and olfactory warnings that the area is occupied (17). Actual defense of territory is rarely necessary, since both the resident and the intruder respect the markings and practice what Hornocker (08) calls mutual avoidance. Home ranges do overlap occasionally, especially if they are large (25). A male may overlap or completely occupy the territories of several females, but they generally do not associate except during courtship (17). Year-round territories of the resident females may be 40-80 square km while resident males occupy an area of 65-90 square km (16). The amount of space a resident cougar requires is a function of the vegetation-topography/prey density-vulnerability complex (08,17) and the maximum number of resident males and females is fixed by these requirements. Excess transient animals apparently have suppressed reproduction until a territory becomes vacant (17). PERIODICITY: Cougars hunt during daylight as well as night (16). When hunting deer, however, they probably are crepuscular to correspond most closely with the activity of their prey. Estimates of the frequency of killing deer vary from 1 per week to 1 every 3-4 weeks (16). Cougars may not actively hunt for another deer to kill until the one Life History - 1 (DRAFT) - Life History Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 presently cached is entirely consumed, which may take a week or more. Thus, hunting may be cyclic. The cycle may be much shorter in summer due to the rapid spoilage of the meat (16), but smaller prey may be an important food source in summer (09). MIGRATION PATTERNS: The only known migration patterns are those necessary to keep contact with the deer herds, which often move considerable distances to escape deep, high altitude snows (04) and to obtain better forage and shelter. COVER/SHELTER REQUIREMENTS: Because they are great wanderers, cougars usually do not have fixed dens except during the breeding season. Cougars spend each day in some thick cover, in a cave, under an overhang, or in a rock fissure, then move on to some similar site for the next day's rest (16). Cougars apparently can stand as much cold as a deer, as evidenced by the fact that they occur as far north and at the same or higher elevations as deer (06). REPRODUCTIVE SITE REQUIREMENTS: Cougars probably use the most secure place they can find in which to rear their kittens. This may be a cave, a fissure between rocks, or merely a thicket or under an uprooted tree (06). The wide range of the species indicates a wide adaptability in this regard. REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: Female cougars may have their first litter as early as 20-21 months of age and as late as 36 months of age, with 2 1/2 years being the more common age to reach sexual maturity (16). Estrus is 4-12 days, averaging 8, and recurs after about 14 days if conception does not occur. Gestation is 90-96 days. Litter size ranges from 1-6 but, 2 or 3 is most common, averaging 2.6 (16). Although no reference is found to the breeding age of males, they probably are capable of breeding by 2 years of age but may not find a vacant territory until some time later. Females separate themselves from males before parturition and may have to guard their kittens to keep the male from killing them. PARENTAL CARE: Kittens are 20-30 cm long at birth and weigh 226-453 g. Eyes are closed for 7-10 days (06). Cougars have 3 pairs of mammae and lactate for about 3 months (16). Estimates of weaning age vary from 4-8 weeks but may continue until the kittens are half grown (06). Females begin bringing meat to the young at 6 weeks of age but may lead them to a kill by 2 months of age, at which time the natal den is abandoned and temporary dens are used near each subsequent kill (16). Kittens are dependent on their mother to catch the majority of their food for at least a year and sometimes up to 2 years (16). The young are driven away prior to the conception of the next litter, usually by 2 years of age (16). POPULATION BIOLOGY: Relatively little is known about the population biology of the cougar because most populations extend over too large an area to be studied effectively. Density apparently is controlled by territorial behavior (mutual avoidance) (08), as modified by a complex of factors involving vegetation, topography, prey density, and prey vulnerability (08,17). Human exploitation is the major cause of death in most Life History - 2 (DRAFT) - Life History Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 populations, and these killings create social instability and vacant territories that may soon become occupied temporarily by more individuals than were removed, provided that transients are available to fill these vacancies (16). Human persecution played a large part in the initial extirpation of the eastern cougar and could cause extirpation again if complete protection and modified human behavior are not realized. Accidental deaths and road kills are another major cause of death, particularly for the Florida panther that is protected from sport hunting (25). Parasites include Trichinella larvae, tapeworms, fleas, ticks, and mites. Rabies and feline panleukopenia are significant diseases that can affect populations and cause die offs (16). Cougars usually do not experience catastrophic disease outbreaks because they use dens only for short periods, avoid spoiled meat, and isolate themselves from other cougars except during courtship and rearing activities (16). Survival and mortality rates vary considerably from population to population, but 8-12 years of age is considered old (16). Captive cougars at least 25 years old are known (02), but females usually cannot reproduce after about 12 years (16). Rate of increase is slow due to the fact that many females do not bear their 2 or 3 kittens until 3 years of age and breed only about every 2 years thereafter (16). Population density is apparently not critical to the survival of populations and has been recorded to range between 26 and 261 square km (10-100 square mi) per cougar (16). SPECIES INTERRELATIONSHIPS: Cougars are best adapted to prey on deer-sized animals (18,24) but are not entirely dependent on the deer if smaller or larger prey are abundant (17). However, in much of the United States, the smaller prey are too small, seasonal, or difficult to catch; and the larger prey are too large or are highly valued by man, such as domestic animals. Therefore, the cougar in the United States is largely dependent on deer. The bobcat competes with the cougar by taking deer (24), but this may be a case of isolated individuals learning to kill deer efficiently and does not characterize entire bobcat populations. The cougar has no natural predators, other than man. OTHER LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTORS: None. Life History - 3
                           (DRAFT) - Management Practices
                               Species COUGAR, EASTERN
                                Species Id ESIS054008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Beneficial Stocking captive-reared wild-strain animals Beneficial Transplanting wild animals Adverse Harassment/Vandalism/Indiscriminate Killing Existing Harassment/Vandalism/Indiscriminate Killing Adverse Poaching Existing Poaching Adverse Food Supply Reduction Existing Food Supply Reduction Adverse Low Gene Pool Existing Low Gene Pool Adverse Predator control Existing Predator control COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - The earliest settlers feared cougars and vigorously resisted the occasional depredations of the animal on their livestock. Cougars were frequently persecuted and many states offered bounties to persons who killed them. Cougars were virtually eliminated from each region soon after it became settled by European immigrants. Early settlers also killed white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), the mainstay of the cougar's diet. With the exception of a few inaccessible mountain ranges and swamps, deer were extirpated or greatly reduced over their entire range and did not become widespread and plentiful again until they were restocked and protected in the 1930's, 1940's, and 1950's (04,20). Areas that were remote and inaccessible enough to retain deer herds were usually small and may not have supported enough cougars to maintain a viable gene-pool (20), a factor that could account for some cougar populations possibly disappearing only within the past 50 years (04). Most, if not all, eastern cougars disappeared before there was an interest in maintaining a captive population, thus there are no known specimens in captivity. While the future holds fewer threats than the past in the form of persecution and reduced food supplies, some illegal persecution and the problem of severely reduced gene pools remains (20). Furthermore, accidental deaths due to encounters with automobiles have proven to be a major threat to Florida panthers (F. c. coryi) (25) and could be a threat to the eastern cougars as well. APPROVED PLAN: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1982. Eastern Cougar Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 17 pp. Recovery of the eastern cougar will have been satisfactorily accomplished when at least three self-sustaining populations have been found or established in the U.S. Each population (which may consist of two or more separate but interbreeding nuclei) will be considered self-sustaining if it contains a minimum of 50 breeding adults, and if losses of these adults are being replaced through reproduction and/or Management Practices - 1 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 Management Practices - 2 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 immigration from nearby populations. Trends in ownership and management of the habitat and in behavior of the human population must be such that the minimum numbers are expected to be sustained indefinitely. One population with a minimum of 50 breeding adults may allow consideration of downlisting to Threatened. Due to lack of suitable habitat and potential conflicts with human uses of suitable habitat it is most probable that the eastern cougar will always be Endangered. Actions recommended for the recovery of the eastern cougar include: I. Find and delineate cougar populations. A. Perform research, develop techniques, and train personnel for identifying positive sign of the presence of cougars. B. Perform systematic searches throughout the subspecies' former range (if no cougars are found consider declaring Felis concolor couguar extinct). II. Study and provide interim protection for cougars that are found. A. An advisory committee will be formed in the vicinity of each population found to plan interim protection (this will include poaching protection), habitat management, and public education programs. B. Cougars should be studied to determine population dynamics and behavior. C. Specimens should be used for subspecific identification (no animals should be sacrificed for this purpose). III. Taxonomic evaluations. A. Use modern techniques to define the taxonomy of 18th and 19th century specimens and develop techniques for identifying live cougars. B. Taxonomically identify existing populations of eastern cougars and manage according to subspecific identity. IV. Develop and implement a permanent management plan. A. Provide protection, habitat management (manage for white-tailed deer - i.e., maintain early successional stages), and public education. B. Continue studies. C. Determine whether each population is self-sustaining or if the trend is in that direction. V. Capture F. c. couguar from the wild as required for management purposes such as restoration, augmentation of small populations and/or captive propagation. VI. When one self-sustaining population of 50 breeding adults is found or established, consider downlisting to Threatened. When three such populations are reached consider delisting. Scent stations and track surveys have been used in areas of concentrated sighting reports in NC, SC, and TN over the past five years. New reports of sightings and kills have been investigated (occasionally producing cougars which escaped or were released from captivity). However, there is still no evidence for the existence of a wild eastern cougar population. Management Practices - 3 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 Management Practices - 4
                                   (DRAFT) - References
                                 Species COUGAR, EASTERN
                                  Species Id ESIS054008
                                      Date 14 MAR 96



     

References

***** REFERENCES FOR ALL NARRATIVES EXCEPT N-OCCURRENCE ***** 01 Baker, R.H. 1983. Michigan mammals. Mich. State Univ. Press, Detroit. 642 pp. 02 Baudy, R. 1980. Personal communication. 03 Berg, W.E. December 1980. Pers. comm. On file: Robert Downing, Clemson, SC. 04 Downing, R.L. 1981. The current status of the cougar in the Southern Appalachians. Proc. Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Symp. Athens, Ga. 1981:142-151. 05 Godin, A.J. 1977. Wild mammals of New England. John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD. 304 pp. 06 Guggisberg, C.A.W. 1975. Wild cats of the world. Taplinger Publ. Co., N.Y., NY. 328 pp. 07 Hall, E.R. 1981. The mammals of North America. John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., NY. Vol. 2. 1181 pp. 08 Hornocker, M.G. 1969. Winter territoriality in mountain lions. J. Wildl. Manage. 33(3):457-464. 09 Hornocker, M.G. 1970. An analysis of mountain lion predation upon mule deer and elk in the Idaho Primative Area. Wildl. Monogr. No. 21. 39 pp. 10 Jackson, H.H.T. 1955. The Wisconsin puma. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 68:149-150. 11 Kerr, R. 1792. The animal kingdom. 644 pp. 12 Lazell, J.D., Jr. 1981. Diagnosis and identification of the races of Felis concolor in eastern North America. Preliminary Rept. to U.S. Fish & Wildl. Serv., On file: Robert Downing, Clemson, SC. 23 pp. 13 McGinnis, H. 1982. On the trail of a Pennsylvania cougar. Pa. Game News 53(2):2-8. 14 McGinnis, H. 1982. Reports of cougars in Pennsylvania since 1890. Unpubl. manuscript. On file: Robert Downing, Clemson, SC. 15 Nelson, E.W. and E.A. Goldman. 1929. List of the pumas, with 3 described as new. J. Mammal. 10(4):345-350. 16 Russell, K.R. 1978. Mountain lion. Chap. 14. IN: Big Game of North America. J.L. Schmidt and D.L. Gilbert, eds. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, PA. 494 pp. 17 Seidensticker, J.C. IV, M.G. Hornocker, W.G. Wiles, and J.P. Messick. 1973. Mountain lion social organization in the Idaho Primitive Area. Wildl. Monogr. No. 35. 60 pp. 18 Tinsley, J.B. 1970. The Florida Panther. Great Outdoors Publ. Co., St. Petersburg, FL. 60 pp. 19 True, F.W. 1884. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 7:610. 20 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1982. Eastern Cougar Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 17 pp. 21 Wright, B.S. 1971. The cougar in New Brunswick. Proc. Symp. on the Native Cats of North America. Portland, OR. 1971:108-119. 22 Wright, B.S. 1972. The eastern panther, a question of survival. Clark, Irwin and Co. Ltd., Toronto, Canada. 180 pp. 23 Wrigley, R.E. and R.W. Nero. 1982. Manitoba's big cat. Manitoba's Museum of Man and Nature, Winnipeg, Canada. 68 pp. 24 Young, S.P. and E.A. Goldman. 1946. The puma mysterious American References - 1 (DRAFT) - References Species COUGAR, EASTERN Species Id ESIS054008 Date 14 MAR 96 cat. Am. Wildl. Inst. Washington, D.C. 358 pp. 25 Downing, R.L. 1985. Unpubl. data. Based on files at Clemson, SC. ***** REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY ***** 01 Lazell, J.D., Jr. 1981. Diagnosis and identification of the races of Felis concolor in eastern North America. Preliminary Rept. to U.S. Fish & Wildl. Serv., On file: R. Downing, Clemson, SC. 23 pp. 02 McGinnis, H. 1982. On the trail of a Pennsylvania cougar. Pa. Game News 53(2):2-8. 03 Berg, W.E. December 1980. Pers. comm. On file: Robert Downing, Clemson, SC. 04 Downing R.L. 1981. The current status of the cougar in the Southern Appalachians. Proc. Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Symp. Athens, GA. 1981:142-151. 05 Godin, A.J. 1977. Wild mammals of New England. John Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, MD. 304 pp. 06 McGinnis, H. 1982. Reports of cougars in Pennsylvania since 1890. Unpubl. manuscript on file: Robert Downing, Clemson, SC. 07 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1982. Eastern Cougar Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 17 pp. 08 Wrigley, R.E. and R.W. Nero. 1982. Manitoba's big cat. Manitoba's Museum of Man and Nature, Winnipeg, Canada. 68 pp. 09 Young, S.P. and E.A. Goldman. 1946. The puma mysterious American cat. Am. Wildl. Inst., Washington, D.C. 358 pp. 10 Downing, R.L. 1985. Unpubl. data. Based on files at Clemson, SC. 11 Wright, B.S. 1971. The cougar in New Brunswick. Proc. Symp. on the Native Cats of North America, Portland, OR. 1971:108-119. 12 Jackson, H.H.T. 1955. The Wisconsin puma. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 68:149-150. 13 Hall, E.R. 1981. The mammals of North America. Vol. II, Second ed. John Wiley & Sons, NY. 1181 pp + index 90 pp. References - 2