(DRAFT) - Taxonomy
                         Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED
                                Species Id ESIS101006
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



TAXONOMY

NAME - RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED OTHER COMMON NAMES - RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED;RAIL, LIGHT-FOOTED; HEN, MARSH, SALT-WATER; HEN and MARSH; PALMOTEADOR ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Birds PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - CHORDATA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - AVES, ORDER AND SUBORDER - GRUIFORMES, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - RALLIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - RALLUS, SPECIES AND SSP - LONGIROSTRIS, LEVIPES SCIENTIFIC NAME - RALLUS LONGIROSTRIS LEVIPES AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Light-footed Clapper Rail Rallus longirostris levipes Bangs, 1899 KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Bird PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Aves ORDER: Gruiformes FAMILY: Rallidae The light-footed clapper rail is a chicken-like bird with a long and slightly decurved bill, long legs and long-toed feet. Plumage colors are tones of brown, cinnamon and buffy white. The upper parts are olive brown, broadly striped with blackish brown, extending down over the sides of the neck and meeting the color of the breast and belly sharply. Flanks and lower belly are broadly barred brown and white, breast cinnamon, throat whitish, superciliary streak buffy, head brownish gray (04). The bill is orange-yellow at the base, the rest brown; the legs and feet are brownish gray (24). Males are larger than females, with wings, tails and tarsi all showing size differences (19,24,34). Males weigh more than females; adult males weigh 400 g or more, females less than 350 g (19,34). The downy chicks are black (19,34). The taxonomic status of clapper rails is a matter of some debate. When first described, the light-footed clapper rail was considered a Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 king rail (Rallus elegans) (11). Later it was listed as a California clapper rail, which at that time was designated as a full species (R. obsoletus) (05). In 1899 Bangs decided that it merited the status of a distinct species and named it R. levipes (04). It remained thus classified until van Rossem revised the taxonomy in 1929 and the Pacific Coast clapper rails were designated as races of one species (28). The light-footed rail became R. obsoletus levipes. Later, Oberholser lumped all North American clapper rails into one species, and the name of this subspecies became R. longirostris levipes (23). No important changes in the taxonomy of levipes have occurred since Oberholser, but there is still question about the southern limits of the bird's range, and its relationship to the races in Baja California (31). There are two other recognized subspecies of clapper rails in California; obsoletus in the San Francisco Bay region, and yumanensis along the lower Colorado River (01,24). There is no disagreement as to the northern limits of levipes range, or any confusion with obsoletus; but there are questions about the southern limit and whether there are one or two additional subspecies in Baja California. The American Ornithologists Union delineated three subspecies in Baja - levipes in Ensenada, magdalenae in San Quintin Bay and south to Magdalena Bay, and beldingi on the tip, on the gulf side (01). Ripley eliminated magdalenae as a subspecies, and found intergrading between levipes and beldingi at Scammon's Lagoon and San Ignacio (24). Further study is needed. In both size and coloration the light-footed clapper rail more closely resembles the king rail (Rallus elegans) than it does the eastern subspecies of clapper rails (19,34). Their vocalizations are also very similar, particularly the advertising calls of both males and females (19,34). In areas on the east and gulf coasts where the king rail is sympatric with clapper rails, some hybridization has been documented (22); Ripley considers the king rail to be a subspecies of the clapper rail and calls it R. longirostris elegans (24). Thus there is considerable question whether R. longirostris and R. elegans are two distinct species (and if so whether the coastal California clapper rails are really king rails), or whether all the above are geographic variants of a single species. The type specimen, described by Bangs in 1899 (04) is in the Harvard Museum of Comparative Zoology. The Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History and the San Diego Natural History Museum have good study collections of skins. A complete description of the California clapper rail (R. l. obsoletus) and full details as to how levipes differs from it is given by Ripley (24). Other descriptions were given by Bangs (04), Grinnell (10), and van Rosem (28). Common name synonyms include, light-footed rail, salt-water marsh hen, marsh hen, and in Mexico the palmoteador. Taxonomy - 2
                                  (DRAFT) - Status
                         Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED
                                Species Id ESIS101006
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



STATUS

Coded Status E: Federal Endangered Federal Migratory Non-consumptive recreational COMMENTS ON STATUS - U.S. STATUSES AND LAWS: The light-footed clapper rail is listed as Endangered pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (50 CFR 17.11). The species has possible occurrence in Los Angeles County and is presently known from Orange, San Diego, Santa Barbara, and Ventura Counties, CA, but is protected wherever found. It is also Federally listed as Endangered in Mexico (Baja California). The light-footed clapper rail is included in the listing of the clapper rail (Rallus longirostris) in the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 USC 703-712 and 50 CFR 10.13). This subspecies is protected by the Lacey Act (P.L. 97-79, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.), which makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, or offspring): (1) in interstate or foreign commerce if taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any State law or regulation; or (2) if taken or possessed in violation of any U.S. law, treaty, or regulation or in violation of Indian tribal law. It is also unlawful to possess any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, and offspring) within the U.S. territorial or special maritime jurisdiction (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7) that is taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, foreign law, or Indian tribal law. RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCIES: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is responsible for the management/recovery, listing and law enforcement protection of this species. The Department of Defense (DOD) has responsibility for cooperation in the management and protection of the species where it occurs on DOD lands. STATE STATUSES AND LAWS: STATE: California Status - 1 (DRAFT) - Status Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 DESIGNATED STATUS: Endangered ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: California Department of Fish and Game STATE STATUTE: California Endangered Species Act; Fish and Game Code, Chapter 1.5, Article 1, Sec. 2050. INTERNATIONAL STATUSES, TREATIES, AND AGREEMENTS: The light-footed clapper rail is included in the IUCN Red Data Book as an Endangered species. Rallus longirostris (the Palmoteador) is listed as Appendix I in Mexico's "Especies de Fauna en Peligro de Extincion en Mexico" (Reyes; August 1982). The subspecies is also listed by the U.S. in the Convention on Nature Protection and Wildlife Preservation in the Western Hemisphere Annex (1970). ECONOMIC STATUSES: The light-footed clapper rail is a rare species sought by birdwatchers. 70/08/25:35 FR 13519/13520 - Proposed rule, add to U.S. list 70/10/13:35 FR 16047/ - Listed as Endangered 85/07/22:50 FR 29901/29909 - Five year review Status - 2
     

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS

HABITAT - AQUATIC TERRESTRIAL INLAND AQUATIC COASTAL LAND USE - Industrial Transportation, communications, and Util Mixed Urban or Built-up Land Bays and Estuaries Nonforested Wetland NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY CODES NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Palustrine FL3 Palustrine EM1 Palustrine EM Palustrine Estuarine, intertidal SB3 Estuarine, intertidal SB2 Estuarine, intertidal FL3 Estuarine, intertidal FL2 Estuarine, intertidal EM1 Estuarine, intertidal COMMENTS ON HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS - Coastal salt marshes, lagoons and their maritime environs are the preferred (and almost exclusive) habitat of the light-footed clapper rail (21,30,37,39). The birds nest in marsh vegetation (both freshwater and salt marsh plants) and forage in the marsh vegetation, on mudflats, in the waters of the marshes and occasionally in the maritime zone (17,19,34). In salt marshes, the rails nest preferentially in cordgrass (Spartina foliosa), in tall, dense stands (16,20,21). They also build nests in dense pickleweed (Salicornia virginica) (06,21), and can nest successfully in marshes like Carpinteria where there is no cordgrass but very thick pickleweed (21). Freshwater marsh vegetation is also used for nesting. Many nests have been found recently in Scirpus spp. and Typha spp. in freshwater seeps along the edges of salt marshes (21). There are several anecdotal accounts of nests in freshwater marsh vegetation early in the century (06,33), indicating that the rails have long found reeds suitable as nest sites, even when salt marsh vegetation was much more plentiful. The rails also nest in totally freshwater marshes, e.g. San Joaquin Reserve on San Diego Creek in Orange County (39). The farthest inland nesting habitat thus far documented is Guajome Lake Marsh, along the San Luis Rey River, about 12.5 km from its mouth (19, 34,39). In coastal salt marshes, mudflats are the primary foraging habitat of the rails, and the invertebrates of the intertidal zone are their main food (16,20). They are, however, opportunistic feeders and can survive (and breed) in freshwater marshes where their food is obviously not intertidal invertebrates. In salt marshes, they have been observed eating a large variety of foods (20); there are no data on freshwater marsh foraging. Habitat Associations - 1 The most productive habitat at this time for light-footed clapper rails in southern California is in Upper Newport Bay, where half the state's population is in residence (35,39). The bay has large stands of tall, dense cordgrass; a good diversity of salt marsh plants in the middle and upper marsh including Salicornia virginica, Suaeda californica, Batis maritima, Jaumea carnosa, Frankenia grandifolia and Triglochin maritimum (20,27); a strong tidal influence; extensive mudflats and stretches of open water; and many stands of reeds and cattails dotted along the edges (20). Destruction of coastal wetlands in southern California has been so extensive that many estuaries where light-footed clapper rails were once abundant have been reduced to remnants. San Diego Bay once had 996 ha of salt marsh and now has 146 ha, Mission Bay, is reduced to 8.5 ha from 972 ha, and the Los Angeles-Long Beach wetlands which once covered 2753 ha are now a remnant 28.3 ha (17). Progress has been made in the past 12 years in preserving the remaining wetlands, largely due to the policies and protective efforts of the California Coastal Commission. The future of the light-footed clapper rail and other salt marsh dependent fauna depends on continued preservation and restoration of coastal wetlands (37). Rail habitat is adjacent to urban industrial areas (or mixed development), roads and highways (See field N-OCCURRENCE for details). Habitat Associations - 2
                                (DRAFT) - Food Habits
                         Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED
                                Species Id ESIS101006
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



FOOD HABITS

TROPHIC LEVEL - OMNIVORE LIFESTAGE FOOD FOOD PART General Vascular Plants-Emergent Nonwoody General Worms General Fish General Amphibia General Mammalia General Carrion General Arthropods General Crustaceans General Molluscs Food Habits - 1
                         (DRAFT) - Environment Associations
                         Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED
                                Species Id ESIS101006
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

G = General A = Adult LIM = Limiting RA = Resting Adult J = Juvenile FA = Feeding Adult RJ = Resting Juvenile BA = Breeding Adult FJ = Feeding Juvenile P = Pupae L = Larvae E = Egg RL = Resting Larvae FL = Feeding Larvae
LIFESTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS G Aquatic Features: Springs [flowing] G Coastal Wetlands: Mangrove swamps G Coastal Features: Vegetated offshore islands Environment Associations - 1
                               (DRAFT) - Life History
                         Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED
                                Species Id ESIS101006
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



LIFE HISTORY

FOOD HABITS: Light-footed clapper rails (Rallus longirostris levipes) forage in all parts of the saltmarsh, concentrating their efforts in low marsh when the tide is out, and moving into higher marsh as the tide advances (19,34). The vegetation-mudflat interface and the mud banks of tidal creeks are favored foraging niches. They spend a lot of time foraging in cordgrass (Spartina foliosa) where they cannot be observed, but when visible are usually probing in mud or picking small edibles from the bases of stems (19,34). Crabs are a favored food. Crab burrows are present in heavy concentrations in creek banks, a favorite foraging area. The striped shore crab (Pachygrapsis crassipes) and the mud crab (Hemigrapsis oregonensis) are favored foods, as evidenced by observations and analysis of regurgitated pellets (16,20). The third species of salt marsh crab (Uca crenulata), the fiddler, was very uncommon in pellets (16). The rails are omnivorous and opportunistic foragers, and have been observed eating insects, isopods, tadpoles (Hyla sp.), California killifish (Fundulus parvipinnis), crayfish (Pacifastacus sp.), garden snails (Helix sp.) (20), and dead mullet (Mugil cephalus). California meadow mice (Microtus californicus) are also believed to be prey (18). Birds ingest some vegetable matter including broken spartina stems and Salicornia tips (18). In analyses of regurgitated pellets, the most common remains were California hornsnails (Cerithidea californica), salt marsh snails (Melampus olivaceus), and crabs (see above) (16,20). Crayfish, beetles, isopods and decapods were also encountered. Pellets, however, give biased food samples, as only hard shell fragments and carapaces withstand digestion and appear in the pellets. The basic diet of the light-footed clapper rail appears to be the vast invertebrate population of the tidal mudflat. However, no systematic study of foods and foraging (except for pellet analysis) has been done, and the above information is based on field observations and anecdotal accounts. The question of what the rails eat in freshwater marshes has not been systematically explored. HOME RANGE/TERRITORY: Light-footed clapper rails are (generally) sedentary marsh residents and maintain territories year round (40). Banding studies in Upper Newport Bay have shown that once established in a territory, pairs stay together throughout the year and from year to year (40). It is probable that they maintain the same territories throughout their lives, unless the habitat is damaged or destroyed (19,34). The entire territory is defended during the breeding season. Males, in particular, give immediate chase to intruders of the same species. Outside of the breeding season the size of the territory does not change (in terms of a foraging home range) but defense is less intense. Rails from adjacent territories sometimes invade their neighbors' space; 3-5 birds have been seen foraging in the same territory without incident (19,34). Territories vary in size depending on the quality of the habitat. Life History - 1 (DRAFT) - Life History Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 In Upper Newport Bay, where the habitat appears to be optimal, home ranges cover from 0.4 to 2.43 ha. These data have been obtained by following the movements of radio-collared birds (40). The estimated amount of saltmarsh in the bay is 100 ha (35), the rail population has been as high as 112 pairs (1983 & 1984) (39), and thus the mean territory size could be computed at 0.9 ha. In Anaheim Bay where habitat is far from optimal, there have not been more than 30 pairs documented since 1980 (39) in a marsh that covers 226 ha (35). Thus a territory there could cover as much as 7.5 ha. PERIODICITY: Strong peaks of activity are observed in the three hours after daylight and the comparable period before dark (40). Foraging activity is greatest in the early morning, while vocalizing shows a strong peak just before dark. Activities are also tide-dependent. During periods of very high tide whatever the time of day, the rails roost in favorite spots in high marsh (40). Bathing is often observed in late day, but is also tide-dependent (40). MIGRATION PATTERNS: The light-footed clapper rail is non-migratory. Once established on a territory, the birds stay throughout the year and from year to year (40). Local wandering, however, has been documented, with sightings of rails in winter, sometimes far inland. Whittier Narrows, 32 km from the coast, and Walnut Canyon Reservoir (Nohl Ranch Lake), 23 km from the coast, are the farthest inland sites documented thus far (19,34). The most probable explanation for winter dispersal is that young birds must seek their own territories, once the family unit breaks up at the end of the breeding season. COVER/SHELTER REQUIREMENTS: Light-footed clapper rails are reclusive birds that prefer running to flying, and spend much of their time hidden in marsh vegetation. They are seldom seen by the uninitiated and seldom venture far from vegetation, even when foraging on mudflats (16,19, 34). Cordgrass is their preferred plant for nesting, and the low littoral zone where cordgrass is dominant is the preferred foraging site (16,19,34). Nests built in cordgrass are covered by a canopy of living stems; in marshes (e.g. Anaheim Bay) where the cordgrass is not tall or dense enough for canopies, the rails often build nests in tumbleweeds that have lodged far out in the low marsh in cordgrass. These provide essential cover for the nest (21). The rails also inhabit marshes that are devoid of cordgrass; pickleweed appears to be an acceptable substitute, if other conditions are suitable (21). The rails can also live in strictly freshwater marsh vegetation (Scirpus spp. and Typha spp.). In 1982, 22% of the population in California was nesting in freshwater marsh vegetation (21). The smallest marsh in which rails have been found nesting is at "F" Street in San Diego County, a 3 ha remnant of pickleweed marsh with a tidal inlet where a single pair usually breeds (39). Life History - 2 (DRAFT) - Life History Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 REPRODUCTIVE SITE REQUIREMENTS: Nests are always built in (or on) marsh vegetation. The preferred plant is cordgrass and the preferred location is in the low littoral zone, where the cordgrass grows densely (16,20,21). The nest is made from dead cordgrass stems densely interwoven and built up on a platform as high as 35 cm before the nest cup is made. The nest is attached to live cordgrass stems and floats upward as the tide rises. There is often a ramp leading from the nest to the mud substrate; it is also constructed from cordgrass stems. A canopy of living stems is pulled over, and entwined above the nest, providing cover from above (20,21). Jorgensen found that tall (>60 cm) dense stands of cordgrass were strongly selected over both short cordgrass and other types of plants (16). Rarely, a nest is built out in the open, on a mass of wrack. The rails blend well with the brown wrack and are apparently protected by their cryptic coloration (19,34). The eggs, however, are white, and are easily seen from above if unattended. Nests are also built in pickleweed (S. virginica) with cordgrass stems as the main building material if available. If cordgrass is not available, stems and branches of pickleweed and other marsh plants are used (21). Nests in freshwater reeds are on the ground, with dead reed stems used as building material. The reeds form a dense natural canopy above the nest (21). REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The breeding season begins as early as mid-February, when the "kek" call of the unmated male is heard in the marsh in late afternoon (19,34). The breeding season is usually over by late August, but downy chicks have occasionally been seen as late as mid-October (19). Pairs have been observed copulating in mid-March (19,34). The earliest documented date for egg laying is 18 March (19), the latest 7 July (16), but these dates represent only what has been found on nest searches. The early date is probably quite accurate, the late date is probably not. The pair bond endures throughout the season, and often from year to year. If a female loses her mate during the breeding season, she advertises for a new mate with a special call (38). On one occasion a female who had lost her mate was observed to have attracted the male from an adjacent territory, at least temporarily (38). It is assumed that a male will begin "keking" if his mate dies. Clutch size is variable. Data pooled from three marshes showed mean clutch sizes in three seasons of 5.83, 6.55, and 7.07 eggs. The range was 4-9 eggs. Total number of clutches was 72 (21). Egg sets from the "Western Foundation for Vertebrate Zoology", collected earlier in the century showed a larger range, from 3-11 eggs, with a mean of 7.0. The number of clutches was 148 (20). The eggs are white. Average weight of 57 eggs from two marshes was 22.5 g; average measurements were 4.46 cm x 3.11 cm (20). The incubation period was verified at three nests in 1980, and was between 21 and 22 days; at two others where the clutch was already complete when the nest was found, hatching occurred 23 to 25 days later (20). For R. l. obsoletus in San Francisco Bay, the incubation Life History - 3 (DRAFT) - Life History Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 period has been given as 24-29 days (03), 23 days (13) and 23-27 days (41). The chicks all hatch within a 24 hour period, and leave the nest with their parents within a few hours after the down dries. Any unhatched eggs are abondoned (20). If a pair loses a clutch of eggs they will renest (12,20). It is assumed that renesting occurs after the loss of young chicks as well. Whether multiple broods are raised in a single nesting season is still not known. There is time (if the first clutch is laid early in the spring), but the total period of time required to breed is at least 9-10 weeks, and the drive to begin breeding again may not survive such a long period. PARENTAL CARE: The chicks are precocial in terms of their mobility. As soon as they are dry after hatching they are out of the nest and into the marsh (19,34). The family forages in the marsh, and the parents feed the chicks. The parents build one or more brood nests for night roosting (12,20). These brood nests are constructed right after the chicks hatch and are similar to the egg nest but lack a canopy. They are usually within a few meters of the egg nest (which is also used for night roosting) but have been found up to 50 m away (20). Both parents feed and guard the chicks, but the extent to which they share these duties is not known. It is not known at what age the chicks are independent and can feed themselves. Adults have been observed feeding youngsters known to have hatched approximately 6 weeks previously (19,34). Many aspects of parental care are unknown, as the rails are very secretive, particularly after the chicks hatch. Telemetry has not been attempted during the breeding season; only by telemetry will more be learned about this phase of the rail's breeding biology. POPULATION BIOLOGY: An increase in the population of light-footed clapper rails is limited by several factors, the most important being a dearth of suitable marsh habitat (17,18,37,39). There are 19 marshes in coastal southern California that currently support populations of 1-112 breeding pairs (39), and another 10-15 with marginal habitat which rails could inhabit if restoration were to be done (18). The 19 marshes now in use range in size from 3-400 ha. Some appear to be at carrying capacity (Upper Newport Bay), others should have many more pairs (Anaheim Bay) (19,34). A major goal of the Recovery Plan is to preserve, restore and/or create 4000 ha of suitable wetland habitat (18); there are now only about 1200 ha of quality habitat to support clapper rail populations (39). Natural catastrophes like heavy winter storms have serious adverse impacts on saltmarshes (21). Predation by hawks and owls on both juveniles and adults is another limiting factor. Red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) (07) and short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) (14) are known predators on Califronia clapper rails. In Upper Newport Bay, the remains of 5 young clapper rails were found in a month's time under one perch in the fall of 1982; hawks/owls were the major suspects (19). The killing of an adult male clapper rail by a red-tailed hawk was Life History - 4 (DRAFT) - Life History Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 observed in Upper Newport Bay (38). Some aspects of population biology are still unknown, particularly population dynamics (mortality rate, longevity, recovery potential, sex ratio, etc.). SPECIES INTERRELATIONSHIPS: The light-footed clapper rail has a close association with cordgrass (Spartina foliosa), the dominant species of the low littoral zone. It is the rail's preferred nesting and foraging habitat. There is a dearth of tall, dense stands of cordgrass in Anaheim Bay and Mugu Lagoon, the two largest salt marshes in southern California. Their extremely small rail populations are directly correlated with this dearth of Spartina (19,34). OTHER LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTORS: None. Life History - 5
                           (DRAFT) - Management Practices
                         Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED
                                Species Id ESIS101006
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Off-Road Vehicles Beneficial Restricting/regulating human disturbance of populations Beneficial Maintaining/Controlling Water Flow Beneficial Beneficial Developing/maintaining/protecting wetlands Beneficial Land Acquisition Beneficial Controlling pollution [thermal, chemical, physical] Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Pesticide Use Beneficial Creating Artificial Habitat/Nesting Structure Beneficial Reforestation Beneficial Controlling/Removing Nonnative Vegetation Beneficial Controlling/Removing Native Vertebrates Beneficial Controlling/Removing Feral Animals Adverse Subsistence Hunting/Fishing/Trapping Existing Subsistence Hunting/Fishing/Trapping Adverse Sport Hunting/Fishing Existing Sport Hunting/Fishing Adverse Existing Adverse Food Supply Reduction Existing Food Supply Reduction Adverse Predation Existing Predation Adverse Gas/Oil Development Existing Gas/Oil Development Adverse Siltation Existing Siltation Adverse Salinity alteration Existing Salinity alteration Adverse Draining wetlands, marshes, ponds, lakes Existing Draining wetlands, marshes, ponds, lakes Adverse Strip mining Existing Strip mining Adverse Water Level Fluctuation Existing Water Level Fluctuation Adverse Flooding Existing Flooding Adverse Reservoirs Existing Reservoirs Adverse Dredging Existing Dredging Adverse Developing/maintaining stream bank vegetation Existing Developing/maintaining stream bank vegetation Adverse Shoreline modification/development Existing Shoreline modification/development Adverse Grazing Existing Grazing Management Practices - 1 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - By 1915 ornithologists were begining to notice the scarcity of light-footed clapper rails in southern California. Willett (33) and Grinnell (09) noted the decline, and by 1919 several biologists felt the bird was almost completely gone from Santa Barbara and San Diego Counties (10.26). Early losses were attributed to overshooting (meat hunters) and possibly cattle grazing in marsh areas (06), but major losses were occurring because of destruction of habitat. One area where there were a dozen nests one year was buried under several feet of dredged mud and sand the next year (08); another had an oil derrick where rails had nested two years previously (17). Dredging and filling, marina and highway development and similar construction for various reasons have continued at an accelerated rate until only about 3441 ha of saltmarsh now remains between Santa Barbara and the Mexican border, an area that at one time had an estimated 10,256 ha of wetlands (17). Particularly hard hit were several areas known to have supported large populations of light-footed clapper rails: San Diego Bay, Mission Bay and the Los Angeles - Long Beach area (17). Because this species is dependent on the coastal salt marsh, entire local populations have been extirpated. In 1972-73 the first census of the rail in southern California was conducted, and the population was estimated at about 500 pairs (30). In 1981 only 203 pairs could be found (35), and the highest count through 1984 was 277 pairs (39). In 1985 the count was 142 pairs. Severe storms and excessive runoff affect rail habitat adversely, as happened in Upper Newport Bay in 1980. Major freshwater intrusion, extensive sedimentation, and increased mobility of pollutants are hypothesized as affecting invertebrate populations and destroying some clapper rail food resources there (21,25,29). Flooding is a recurrent problem in lagoons in San Diego County where the ocean entrances are not patent (37). Winter storms have made lakes out of salt marshes rendering them useless for nesting, as at Los Penasquitos in 1977 (19) and Tijuana Marsh (15). Predation is a problem in some marshes, limiting the number of secure nest sites (21). The birds are often faced with a choice of nesting in predator-accessible sites that are safe from flooding, or predator-free sites out in the low marsh where nests flood out during high tides (21). Predation by hawks and owls on both juveniles and adults is a limiting factor. Red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) (07) and short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) (14) are known predators on Califronia clapper rails. In Upper Newport Bay, the remains of 5 young clapper rails were found in a month's time under one perch in the fall of 1982; hawks/owls were the major suspects (19). The killing of an adult male clapper rail by a red-tailed hawk was observed in Upper Newport Bay (38). APPROVED PLAN: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. Recovery Plan for the Light-footed Clapper Rail. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. 121 pp. The primary objective for recovering the light-footed clapper Management Practices - 2 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 rail is to increase the breeding population in California to at least 800 pairs. This will be accomplished by preserving, restoring and/or creating about 4,000 hectares (10,000 acres) of protected, marsh managed wetland habitat, of which at least 50 percent of the marshes must have habitat suitable for the light-footed clapper rail in at least 20 marsh complexes. Upon attaining this quantitative goal (subject to results of future research), the subspecies may be considered for downlisting to Threatened. The following activities must be completed in order to attain the above recovery objective: 1. Manage habitat to preserve and/or to enhance protected marshes at identified California locations and unprotected habitats at other California locations and in Mexico. 2. Preserve and manage habitat to reestablish former habitat conditions at various marshes. 3. Control pollution, pesticides, predators (especially pets and feral animals, and native vertebrates), and human disturbance (such as off-road vehicle use and hiking). Remove exotic vegetation and improve or restore tidal actions (altering water flow and salinity). Create nesting hammocks, low marsh, and fresh water marsh. 4. Determine factors which limit rail populations and dispersal of Spartina foliosa, population dynamics, breeding biology, habitat utilization, foraging habits, and rate of growth. 5. Assess the effects of rail management and determine the current status by monitoring and evaluating populations and habitat trends both in California and Mexico. 6. Maintain maps and descriptions of essential habitat. 7. Establish a public information and education program. 8. Enforce existing laws and regulations to protect the species and its habitat. Management Practices - 3
                                   (DRAFT) - References
                           Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED
                                  Species Id ESIS101006
                                      Date 14 MAR 96



     

References

***** REFERENCES FOR ALL NARRATIVES EXCEPT N-OCCURRENCE ***** 01 American Ornithologists Union. 1957. Check-list of North American birds, 5th ed. 691 pp. 02 American Ornithologists Union. 1983. Check-list of North American birds, 6th ed. 877 pp. 03 Applegarth, J.H. 1938. The ecology of the California clapper rail on the south arm of San Francisco Bay. M.S. thesis, Stanford Univ. 04 Bangs, O. 1899. A new rail from Southern California. Proc. New Eng. Zool. Club 1:45-46. 05 Belding, L. 1883. Catalogue of a collection of birds made at various points along the western coast of Lower California, north of Cape St. Eugenio. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 5:527-532. 06 Bent, A.C. 1926. Life histories of North American marsh birds. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 135. 502 pp. 07 DeGroot, D.S. 1927. The California clapper rail: its nesting habits, enemies and habitat. Condor 29:259-270. 08 Edwards, H.A. 1922. Some notes on the light-footed rail. Oologist 39:60-61. 09 Grinnell, J. 1915. A distributional list of the birds of California. Pac. Coast Avifauna 11. 10 Grinnell, J., H.C. Bryant, and T.I. Storer. 1918. The game birds of California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley. 11 Henshaw, H.W. 1896. Report on the ornithology of the portions of California visited during the field season of 1895. Annual Report, Geographic Survey west of the 100th Meridian. Appendix H8 of Appendix JJ, Pp. 224-278. 12 Johnson, R.W. 1973. Observations on the ecology and management of the northern clapper rail, Rallus longirostris crepitans Gmelin in Nassau County, New York. Ph.D. diss., Cornell Univ., New York. 223 pp. 13 Johnston, R.F. 1956. The incubation period of the clapper rail. Condor 58:166. 14 Johnston, R.F. 1956. Predation by short-eared owls on a salicornia salt marsh. Wilson Bull. 68:91-102. 15 Jorgensen, Paul D. 1985. Personal communication. Calif. Dept. Parks and Recreation, 3990 Old Town Ave., Suite 300-C, San Diego, CA 92110. 16 Jorgensen, P.D. 1975. Habitat preference of the light-footed clapper rail in Tijuana Marsh, California. M.S. thesis, San Diego State Univ. 115 pp. 17 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1979. Light-footed Clapper Rail Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. 18 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. Light-footed Clapper Rail Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento, CA. 121 pp. 19 Massey, Barbara W. Field notes. 1825 Knowville Ave, Long Beach, CA 90815. 20 Massey, B.W. and R. Zembal. 1980. A comparative study of the light-footed clapper rail (Rallus longirostris levipes) populations in Anaheim Bay and Upper Newport Bay, Orange County, California. References - 1 (DRAFT) - References Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Endangered Species Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Sacramento, CA 95825. 21 Massey, B.W., R. Zembal, and P.D. Jorgensen. 1984. Nesting habitat of the light-footed clapper rail in southern California. J. Field Ornithol. 55:67-80. 22 Meanley, B. 1969. Natural history of the king rail. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, North American Fauna 67. 23 Oberholser, H.C. 1937. A revision of the clapper rails (Rallus longirostris Boddaert). Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 84:313-354. 24 Ripley, S.D. 1977. Rails of the World. David r. Godine, Boston, Mass. 25 Seapy, R.R. 1981. Structure, distribution, and seasonal dynamics of the benthic community in Upper Newport Bay, California. Marine Resources Tech. Rep. #46. (Available from: Cal. Dept. Fish Game, Sacramento, CA.) 26 Stephens, F. 1919. An annotated list of the birds of San Diego County, California. Trans. San Diego Soc. Nat. Hist. 3:1-40. 27 Vogl, R.J. 1966. Saltmarsh vegetation of Upper Newport Bay, California. Ecology 47:80-87. 28 van Rossem, A.J. 1929. The status of some Pacific Coast clapper rails. Condor 31:213-215. 29 Wahl, K.L., J.R. Crippen, and J.M. Knott. 1980. Floods of January and February 1980 in California. USGS, Open-file Report 80-1005. Menlo Park, CA. 30 Wilbur, S. 1974. The status of the light-footed clapper rail. Amer. Birds 28:868-870. 31 Wilbur, S. and R.E. Tomlinson. 1976. The literature of the western clapper rails. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Special Sci. Rep. No. 194. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Washington, D.C. 32 Willett, G. 1906. The southern California clapper rail breeding on freshwater. Condor 8:151. 33 Willett, G. 1912. Birds of the pacific slope of southern California. Pac. Coast Avifauna 7. 122 pp. 34 Zembal, R. Field notes. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 24000 ' Avila Rd., Laguna Niquel, CA 92677. 35 Zembal, R. and B.W. Massey. 1981. A census of the light-footed clapper rail in California. Western Birds 12:89-99. 36 Zembal, R. and B.W. Massey. 1983. To catch a clapper rail - twice. N. Amer. Bird Bander 8:144-148. 37 Zembal, R. and B.W. Massey. 1983. The light-footed clapper rail: Distribution, nesting strategies, and management. Cal-Neva Wildlife Trans. 1983:97-103. 38 Zembal, R. and B.W. Massey. In press. Function of a rail "mystery" call. Auk. 39 Zembal, R. and B.W. Massey. In press. Distribution of the light-footed clapper rail in California, 1980-1984. Amer. Birds. 40 Zembal, R., B.W. Massey, J. Fancher, and C. Wilcox. In prep. Movements and activity patterns of the light-footed clapper rail. 41 Zucca, J.J. 1954. A study of the California clapper rail. Wasman J. Biol. 12:135-153. ***** REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY ***** References - 2 (DRAFT) - References Species RAIL, CLAPPER, LIGHT-FOOTED Species Id ESIS101006 Date 14 MAR 96 01 American Ornithologists Union. 1957. Check-list of North American birds, 5th ed. 691 pp. 02 Bent, A.C. 1926. Life histories of North American marsh birds. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 135. 502 pp. 03 Grinnell, J., H.C. Bryant, and T.I. Storer. 1918. The game birds of California. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley. 04 Grinnell, J. and A.H. Miller. 1944. The distribution of the birds of California. Pacif. Coast Avifauna 27. 05 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. Light-footed Clapper Rail Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish & Wildl. Serv., Sacramento, CA. 121 pp. 06 Massey, Barbara W. Field notes. 1825 Knowville Ave, Long Beach, CA 90815. 07 Wilbur, S. 1974. The status of the light-footed clapper rail. Amer. Birds 28:868-870. 08 Wilbur, S., P.D. Jorgensen, B.W. Massey, and V.A. Basham. 1979. The light-footed clapper rail: An update. Amer. Birds 33:251. 09 Wilbur, S. and R.E. Tomlinson. 1976. The literature of the western clapper rails. U.S. Fish & Wildl. Serv. Special Sci. Rep. No. 194. Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Washington, D.C. 10 Zembal, Richard. Field notes. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 24000 Avila Rd., Laguna Niquel, CA 92677. 11 Zembal, R. and B.W. Massey. 1981. A census of the light-footed clapper rail in California. Western Birds 12:87-99. 12 Zembal, R. and B.W. Massey. In press. Distribution of the light-footed clapper rail in California, 1980-1984. Amer. Birds. References - 3