(DRAFT) - Taxonomy
                                Species FINCH, NIHOA
                                Species Id ESIS101042
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



TAXONOMY

NAME - FINCH, NIHOA OTHER COMMON NAMES - FINCH, NIHOA; FINCHBILL, NIHOA; FINCH-BILL, NIHOA; FINCH, LAYSAN; HONEYCREEPER; TELESPIZA and NIHOA ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Birds PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - CHORDATA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - AVES, ORDER AND SUBORDER - PASSERIFORMES, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - FRINGILLIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - TELESPYZA, SPECIES AND SSP - ULTIMA, SCIENTIFIC NAME - TELESPYZA ULTIMA AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Nihoa Finch Telespyza ultima Bryan, 1917 KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Bird PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Aves ORDER: Passeriformes FAMILY: Fringillidae The Nihoa finch (Telespyza ultima Bryan 1917) resembles the closely related Laysan finch (Telespyza cantans) in many respects, including plumage (01,08,09,10,37). In fact, Nihoa finches have been referred to as a "dwarfed" form of the Laysan finch (01). In adult males, the head, neck, back, throat, breast, and secondary edgings are yellow; the flanks, lower back, and rump are gray, and there is a gray band between the neck and the mid-back. In adult females, the sides of the head, the throat, breast, and secondary edgings are yellow; the head and back feathers are edged with yellow and steaked with black. The back is also streaked. The flanks are drab gray. Both sexes have whitish abdomens (08,10). Unlike Laysan finches, Nihoa finches acquire adult plumage in a single year (10). Nihoa finches are also smaller than Laysan finches (01,07,10,36), and are reported to have less obvious sexual dimorphism. In addition, immature Nihoa finches are darker and more Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 extensively streaked than immature Laysan finches (10). The weights of six captive Nihoa finches ranged between 21 and 28 grams (08). When the Nihoa finch was first described by Bryan (01), he clearly recognized its relationship to the Laysan finch; consequently, he assigned it to the same genus (01,11). Unfortunately, he as well as others (13), misspelled the genus as Telespiza (as opposed to Wilson's original spelling of Telespyza) and subsequently both of these spellings appear frequently in the literature. Telespyza is now accepted as the correct spelling (12). Bryan considered that this species was very likely to be the last native Hawaiian passerine discovered (01), and thus he named it ultima (as it turned out, he was mistaken). The Nihoa finch has sometimes been considered a subspecies: e.g. Telespiza cantans ultima or Psittirostra cantans ultima (02,07,12,36, 37). However, Banks and Laybourne (10) reviewed the Laysan and Nihoa finches and concluded that they should be classified as distinct species, and not subspecies, based on sufficient differences between them such as age and sexual dimorphism, plumage sequence, size and color differences. In some older literature, the Nihoa finch was placed in the genus Psittirostra (02,03,04,05,36), which includes another heavy-billed honeycreeper, the 'O'u (Psittirostra psittacea). The Convention on Nature Protection and Wildlife Preservation in the Western Hemisphere Annex for the U.S. (1970) lists both the Laysan and Nihoa finches under the species designation Psittirostra cantans. Other common names for the Nihoa finch which were found in the literature are: Nihoa finchbill (02), Nihoa finch-bill (Western Hemisphere Convention Annex, 1967) Laysan finch (03,37), Nihoa Telespiza (06), and honeycreeper (50 CFR 17.11). Nihoa finches, along with the other endemic Hawaiian honeycreepers, were formerly considered to be in a separate family, the Drepanididae, but are now considered to be a unique subfamily, the Drepanidinae, under the family Fringillidae (12). This reclassification is partly based on the work done by Raikow on Hawaiian honeycreeper myology (14,15). Photos of Nihoa finches can be seen in Sincock and Kridler, 1977 (02); Berger, 1972 (04); Berger, 1987 (08); and the Endangered Species Technical Bulletin (16). Both Clapp et al., 1977 (17) and Banko, 1979 (05) have compiled location lists for Nihoa finch specimens; the latter is a more current and complete list. Banko lists 73 specimens in 8 museums. He reports that the type specimen and three paratypes are held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History in Los Angeles, as G. Willett reported in 1945 (35). Taxonomy - 2
                                  (DRAFT) - Status
                                Species FINCH, NIHOA
                                Species Id ESIS101042
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



STATUS

Coded Status E: Federal Endangered COMMENTS ON STATUS - U.S. STATUSES AND LAWS: The Nihoa finch (Telespyza ultima) has been designated an Endangered species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (50 CFR 17.11; P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1540), as amended. The species has this status wherever found including the State of Hawai`i. This species is protected by the Lacey Act (P.L. 97-79, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) which makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, or offspring): (1) in interstate or foreign commerce if taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, or foreign law; or (2) if taken or possessed in violation of any U.S. law, treaty, or regulation or in violation of Indian tribal law. It is also unlawful to possess any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, and offspring) within the U.S. territorial or special maritime jurisdiction (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7) that is taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, foreign law, or Indian tribal law. RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCIES: USFWS -Responsible for the management/recovery, listing, and law enforcement/protection of this species. All Federal agencies have responsibility to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by that agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of Critical Habitat (50 CFR 402), and to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of the species. STATE STATUSES AND LAWS: STATE: Hawai`i DESIGNATED STATUS: Endangered ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Dept. of Land and Natural Resources STATE STATUTE: Hawai'i Revised Statutes, Chapter 195D. INTERNATIONAL STATUSES, TREATIES, AND AGREEMENTS: Status - 1 (DRAFT) - Status Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 The Nihoa finch is listed by the U.S. as Psittirostra cantans in the Convention on Nature Protection and Wildlife Preservation in the Western Hemisphere Annex (1970). ECONOMIC STATUSES: None. 67/03/11:32 FR 04001 - Original listing 69/03/08:34 FR 05034/05035 - Republished list 70/08/25:35 FR 13519/13520 - Proposed relisting 70/10/13:35 FR 16047/16048 - Final ruling on previous list 74/01/04:39 FR 01171/01178 - Updated list 76/09/30:41 FR 43340/43358 - Updated list 76/10/27:41 FR 47180/47198 - Updated list to correct errors 77/07/14:42 FR 36420/36431 - Updated list 78/12/11:43 FR 58030/58048 - Updated list 79/05/21:44 FR 29566/29577 - Notice of status review 80/05/20:45 FR 33768/33781 - Updated list 83/07/27:48 FR 34182/34196 - Updated list 85/07/22:50 FR 29901/29909 - Notice of Review Status - 2
     

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS

HABITAT - TERRESTRIAL TERRESTRIAL COASTAL LAND USE - Mixed Rangeland Streams and Canals Bare Exposed Rock Mixed Barren Land NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY CODES NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Riverine, intermittent RB1 COMMENTS ON HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS - The Nihoa finch is endemic to the steep, rocky, shrubby island of Nihoa (in the past, sometimes called "Bird Island" or "Moku Manu" (22)) in the Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge (09,12). Nihoa is approximately 156 acres in size (09). The Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Passerine Recovery Plan (02) lists the present essential habitat for the Nihoa finch as: "All land to the mean lower low water line on Nihoa Island (approximately 62 ha (153 acres)). Nihoa finches appear to prefer open but vegetated habitat (25). They are also reported to use all parts of Nihoa Island (02). About twenty-five species of plants have been reported for Nihoa, but only four are abundant (listed in descending order of abundance): Chenopodium oahuense, Solanum nelsoni, Sida fallax, and Eragrostis variabilis (25,26). Other principal species include (in descending order of abundance): the endemic palm Pritchardia remota, Sesbania tomentosa, Euphorbia celastroides, Ipomoea indica, Panicum torridum, and Schiedea verticillata. Less common plants are: Portulaca oleracea, Portulaca villosa, Portulaca lutea, Ipomoea pes-caprae, Rumex giganteus, Heliotropium currassavicum, Sicyos nihoaensis, and Amaranthus brownii. The mixture of plants has been described as "heterogeneous" (02), although some zonation (Eragrostis along ridges, Euphorbia along cliff edges, and Pritchardia in the valleys) exists (26). One study on Nihoa finches demonstrated that their presence was positively correlated with Sida fallax height and cover. There was also a significant positive correlation with mean and maximum Solanum nelsoni height (25). Nihoa finches prefer to nest in the rock outcroppings, in rocky crevices, or in small holes (i.e. resembling burrows) under piles of loose rock (02,03,07,17,25) on Nihoa. The Nihoa finches frequently congregate near the few fresh water seeps or near ephemeral puddles of fresh water (17,25). It is possible that each bird may visit a seep once a day (25). Conant (25) found that one of several fresh water seeps was visited by 273 Nihoa finches during eight hours of observation and concluded that access to fresh water may well be essential to the Nihoa finch. If the vegetation, fresh water seeps, or rocky areas were disturbed, there could be adverse impacts on the ability of Nihoa finches to forage, find cover, or nesting sites. Rainfall on Nihoa is probably similar to that on French Frigate Shoals, which varied from 26 to 54 inches per year during 1967 to 1974 (02). Habitat Associations - 1 Average monthly temperatures are also probably similar to French Frigate Shoals, where the daytime temperature averages 75 degrees F +/- a few degrees. On Nihoa itself, Sincock and Kridler (02) recorded maximum and minimum temperatures of 88 and 54 degrees F during their visits from 1969 through 1974. The elevation of Nihoa rises from sea level to approximately 900 feet at Miller's and Tanager Peaks on the west and east ends of the island (09). It is a difficult island to land on, due to its rocky shore and nearly inaccessible beach (02,40); steep cliffs are on three of its four sides. Other specific environmental or life stage requirements such as roosting and courtship display sites, precipitation, and precise moisture requirements are not currently known. Habitat Associations - 2
                                (DRAFT) - Food Habits
                                Species FINCH, NIHOA
                                Species Id ESIS101042
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



FOOD HABITS

TROPHIC LEVEL - OMNIVORE LIFESTAGE FOOD FOOD PART General Forb Leaves/Stems General Evergreen Shrubs-Leaves/Twigs General Evergreen Shrubs-Flowers/Fruit/Seed General Evergreen Trees-Flowers/Fruit/Seed General Arthropods General General Forb Flowers/Fruit/Seed General Aves Food Habits - 1
                         (DRAFT) - Environment Associations
                                Species FINCH, NIHOA
                                Species Id ESIS101042
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

G = General A = Adult LIM = Limiting RA = Resting Adult J = Juvenile FA = Feeding Adult RJ = Resting Juvenile BA = Breeding Adult FJ = Feeding Juvenile P = Pupae L = Larvae E = Egg RL = Resting Larvae FL = Feeding Larvae
LIFESTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS G Aquatic Features: Springs [flowing] G Coastal Features: Rocky offshore islands G Coastal Features: Vegetated offshore islands G Terrestrial Features: Loess Hills G Terrestrial Features: Burrows G Terrestrial Features: Talus G Terrestrial Features: Cliffs/ledges G Terrestrial Features: Rock outcrops Environment Associations - 1
                               (DRAFT) - Life History
                                Species FINCH, NIHOA
                                Species Id ESIS101042
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



LIFE HISTORY

FOOD HABITS: Nihoa finches are a classic example of an omnivore (25). Their diet consists of plant seeds, leaves, flowers, buds, fruit, insects, and eggs (02,03,04,07,08,17,18,19,25,26,27). Nihoa finches have been observed feeding on green flower heads and fruit of Chenopodium (03,26), partly green seeds of Portulaca villosa (03), and seeds and leaf buds of Sida fallax (25,26). When the introduced population of Nihoa finches was still extant on French Frigate Shoals, finches were also observed to feed on seeds of Casuarina, Chenopodium, Tribulus, and Lepturus (18). On Nihoa, Kramer reported that the majority of the finches foraged under the closed canopy of Chenopodium, Solanum, and Sida (19). Nihoa finches are reported to eat insects (04,25,26) and seabird eggs (02,03,07,17,25), especially tern eggs (02). However, like the Laysan finch (Telespyza cantans), Nihoa finches probably cannot crack the larger eggs (28), although they would probably eat any egg which is open (29). Seabird eggs which are reported to be preyed upon by Nihoa finches include: bulwer petrels (Bulweria bulwerii) (27); brown noddies (Anous stolidus pileatus) (04,17,27); Grey-backed terns (Sterna lunata) (17); Red-footed boobies (Sula sula rubripes) (17); and wedge-tailed shearwaters (Puffinus pacificus chlororhynchus) (17). Berger concluded that the preferred diet of captive Nihoa finches was mixed bird seed, lettuce, oranges, papayas, and whole, cracked chicken eggs. He also supplemented their diet with fruit flies (larvae and pupae), protein cereal and carrots (08). Berger (08) observed that captive Nihoa finches appeared to take fresh water daily. Wild finches have also been reported to congregate near the fresh water seeps on Nihoa (17,25). It has been suggested by at least one observer (25) that each Nihoa finch visits a seep once a day. There is certainly some seasonality in the food sources available to the Nihoa finches; seabird eggs are available during their various breeding seasons, but are not in constant supply year-round (17). Also, vegetation changes due to rain (or lack thereof) probably cause the production of varying amounts of seeds and other plant parts (20), as well as insects. No information was availalbe which gave food requirements or preferences for the different life stages of wild Nihoa finches. However, in the closely related Laysan finch, Throp (24) reported that captive Laysan finches fed their young hatchlings animal food and egg for the first two weeks; later other items were added to the diet. HOME RANGE/TERRITORY: Conant (25) reports that it is not clear whether or not Nihoa finches defend a large nesting territory. Her observations at a single active nest revealed that the male finch chased other birds from an area within 3 to 4 meters (10-13 feet) of the nest site. No other information on territory or home range was located. More research is needed on this aspect of Nihoa finch ecology. PERIODICITY: Life History - 1 (DRAFT) - Life History Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 Nihoa finches are a diurnal species. Captive Nihoa finches were reported to roost at night in the branches, grass tussocks, and the cement blocks in their cage (08). Reported observations of wild finches were made during the daytime hours and no unusual patterns, either daily or seasonally, were reported (02,08,17,25). MIGRATION PATTERNS: Nihoa finches are a non-migratory species (12). They are endemic to Nihoa Island in the Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge (09). COVER/SHELTER REQUIREMENTS: There have not been many studies or observations on Nihoa finches which define specific cover/shelter requirements. Based on observation with captive Nihoa finches, it appears that wild Nihoa finches must require nocturnal roosting sites. Captive finches have been observed to roost in the branches, grass tussocks, and cement blocks in their cage (08). In the wild, Nihoa finches nest in rock crevices or under piles of loose rock (25). These rocky sites appear to be a specific need for long-term Nihoa finch survival. The presence of Nihoa finches also appears to be correlated with Sida fallax and Solanum (25); both plants are probably important for food as well as cover. REPRODUCTIVE SITE REQUIREMENTS: Nihoa finches usually build their nests in holes or crevices in or under rocks (02,03,07,17,25). Sincock and Kridler (02) reported finding 13 nests in small, fist-size holes in the rimrock along a gulch, and Conant (25,39) found 12 nests all in holes in rock faces or in rock piles. When Nihoa finches were introduced onto Tern Island, French Frigate Shoals, they nested in holes in a brick pile (02). Captive Nihoa finches have nested in cement blocks, and one reportedly also began a nest in a 6-inch diameter elbow pipe (08). The nest itself is made of twigs, grass, and large seabird (e.g., frigatebird and booby) feathers (02,03). Shredded paper is also used when it is available (02,18) due to the presence of humans. No information on display or nursery area requirements was located in the reviewed literature. REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The literature review on Nihoa finches did not reveal any information on age at sexual maturity, or minimum and maximum breeding ages. An adult female Nihoa finch which was color-banded by Conant (25) in 1980 had first been marked with a numbered USFWS band in 1968, when its age was unknown. Although its breeding status was unconfirmed, the finch was at least 12 years old when it was rebanded. Conant (25) estimated that the Nihoa finch breeding season may span the months from February to August. Clapp et al., (17) suggested that nesting ran principally from February to at least April. Sincock and Kridler suggested that nesting occurs during the winter and spring, with a peak in March (02). In captivity, Berger reported that his Nihoa finches nested from March to June in 1972, and from March to Life History - 2 (DRAFT) - Life History Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 May and in September and November 1973 (08). In captivity, a female was observed to solicit copulation during late December (08) and copulation was observed in early January. In wild Nihoa finches, nest building has been reported in March (30). Eggs have been found in the months of March (02) and July (25). Young have been found in the nest in March (02,03). Juveniles have been observed in late June and early July (27). There is no information on the number of nesting attempts that may be undertaken by wild birds during the breeding season. In one captive female, at least three nesting attempts were made between January and July (08). Another captive female raised a fledgling to independence by July, but began a second clutch before the fledgling was independent (08). Nihoa finches are apparently monogamous (08); the duration of pairing is unknown. The most frequent clutch size recorded is three (09). Sincock and Kridler (02) report a maximum clutch of four nestlings per nest; however, their observation of a total of 38 eggs and nestlings in 13 nests averages to approximately three eggs/young per nest. Conant (40) observed one 5-egg clutch, one 4-egg clutch, and two 3-egg clutches in April of 1983. In captivity, the incubation period for one nest was 15 days and 9 hours. The female on this nest did not begin incubation until after the third egg was laid (08). The length of incubation in wild nests has not been reported. PARENTAL CARE: There is very little information available on parental care in wild Nihoa finches. The young of Nihoa finches are altricial (08), like all passerines. In captivity, only the female Nihoa finch has been reported to incubate eggs; the male feeds the female during incubation and also (at least on one occasion) the male as well as the female fed the nestlings and fledglings (08). In wild Nihoa finches, male finches were observed chasing other finches from the area 3 to 4 meters (10-13 feet) around the nest (25). For one nest of captive Nihoa finches, the eggs hatched on June 26 and the young left the nest on July 19, a period of about 24 days (08). One of these young was first observed to sing when it was about 65 days old (08). No information was located concerning the duration of the family bond. POPULATION BIOLOGY: The current limiting factors for Nihoa finches are probably food supply, weather, and nesting sites. This conclusion is partly based on the fact that their habitat on Nihoa, although encompassing the whole island (02), is only about 156 acres in size (09). The population appears to fluctuate from year to year (02,09); it may be that the carrying capacity of the island fluctuates and is the cause of some of these population fluctuations (09). In addition, weather (e.g., storms, droughts) may cause stochastic population changes. Life History - 3 (DRAFT) - Life History Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 However, Clapp et al. (17) did not think there were pronounced seasonal changes in population numbers. The highest recorded population density for Nihoa finches was 43 per acre (6,686 total) in 1968. During the period from 1964 to 1980, the population estimates fluctuated between 1,318 and 6,686 (02, 09,31,32,40). Other estimates have been: 500 to 1,000 in 1940 (07); 800 to 1,200 (19); 2,500 to 5,000 in 1964 (30); 1,608 in 1980 (16); and 3,194 +/- 890 in 1985 (33). The precision and accuracy of these population estimates are extremely variable. Longevity in Nihoa finches has been reported for captive birds. Berger (34) had a total of ten captive Nihoa finches die at the following ages (in months): 18.5, 25, 25, 61, 71.5, 72, 72.4, 81, 94, and 112 (a range from 1.5 to 9.3 years). Four other of his captive Nihoa finches died within 6 months of capture. An adult female Nihoa finch which was colored banded by Conant (25) in 1980 had first been marked with a numbered USFWS band in 1968, when its age was unknown. Thus, Nihoa finches may live up to 12 or 13 years in the wild. No information on survival rates, mortality rates, sex ratios, recovery potential, or turnover rate was located during the literature review. SPECIES INTERRELATIONSHIPS: Nihoa finches will crack and eat eggs of other birds, and therefore sometimes act as a predator (02,03,07,08,17,25,27). They appear to be especially fond of tern eggs (02). See "Food Habits" above for seabird eggs which have been reported to be Nihoa finch prey. The presence of humans aggravates egg predation by the finches because it can cause breeding adult seabirds to flush from and remain off of their eggs, exposing the eggs to finch predation (02,40). OTHER LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTORS: Over the years, many population estimates have been reported for Nihoa finches on Nihoa (02,16,19,30,31,32,33) ranging from a low estimate of 500 to 1000 in 1940 (07) to a high of 6686 in 1968 (02). In 1980, three different census methods yielded population estimates of 1499 +/- 250, 1608 +/- 418, and 2219 +/- 173 (40). Like many insular species, Nihoa finches are quite fearless and are "so tame that by exercising a little patience one was able to make these birds approach to within a distance of one or two feet" (07). The Nihoa finch is said to have a sweet song "resembling a canary" (01). Berger (04) reported that both sexes sing although the males were more "persistent" in singing. He also reported that the finches' songs have a canary-like quality. Life History - 4
                           (DRAFT) - Management Practices
                                Species FINCH, NIHOA
                                Species Id ESIS101042
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Boating Activities Beneficial Restricting/regulating human disturbance of populations Beneficial Controlling/Removing Nonnative Vegetation Beneficial Stocking captive-reared wild-strain animals Beneficial Disease Control Measures Beneficial Controlling/Removing Invertebrates Beneficial Controlling/Removing Exotic Vertebrates Adverse Incidental Capturing/Killing Existing Incidental Capturing/Killing Adverse Existing Adverse Food Supply Reduction Existing Food Supply Reduction Adverse Disease Existing Disease Adverse Parasites Existing Parasites Adverse Soil compaction by heavy equipment in mine areas Existing Soil compaction by heavy equipment in mine areas Adverse Exotic/Feral/Introducted Species Existing Exotic/Feral/Introducted Species Adverse Erosion Existing Erosion Adverse Vegetation Composition Changes Existing Vegetation Composition Changes Adverse Fire Existing Fire COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - The Nihoa finch is endemic to Nihoa Island (also obsoletely called "Moku Manu" or "Bird Island" (22)), a small, steep island of approximately 156 acres (02,09). The very small size and fragility (e.g., susceptibility to fire and impacts of introduced organisms) of the historic range is one of the main factors which has been used in the determination of the Nihoa finch's endangered status (02,16). One past impact on the Nihoa finches has been human disturbance; for example, in the 1880's, a picnic expedition to Nihoa started a brush fire which "must have killed off many birds" (23). Another past impact has been unauthorized military use of Nihoa, as well as other remote islands (19,20,21), although in most recent years this has not been reported to be a problem. Unfortunately, some of the non-native weed and insect species on Nihoa probably arrived there in this way on equipment and clothing (20). Also heavy equipment use can result in direct incidental mortality as well as contributing to increased erosion of habitat. If the vegetation, fresh water seeps, or rocky areas were disturbed, there could be adverse impacts on the ability of Nihoa finches to forage, find cover, or nesting sites. Management Practices - 1 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 Nihoa finches, like Laysan finches (Telespyza cantans), are very attracted to standing fresh water; Amerson (18) reported that introduced Nihoa finches on French Frigate Shoals drowned both in an uncovered bucket and an uncovered 55 gallon drum of fresh water. The factors which presently threaten the Nihoa finch population on Nihoa are: - human activity (02,18); - the introduction of pest plants or animals (e.g. predators or insects and parasites) via natural or man-made causes (02,20), which may compete with food plants and/or reduce food supplies; - unauthorized and emergency landings, especially those which may cause exotic introductions (02,19,20,21); - fire (02,23); - avian diseases, which could arrive either naturally or due to human activities (01,09). A closely related species, the Laysan finch, has been shown in captivity to be extremely susceptible to bird diseases. This is probably due to the natural isolation of these insular species; the Laysan finches were shown to be susceptible to "common infections" such as Staphylococcus and Poxvirus avium (avian pox) (02, 24,38); - weather (e.g. hurricanes or droughts) which destroy habitat (02), and food supply as a result of the latter. Future threats to Nihoa finches in the wild are the same as the present threats which are listed above, except that unauthorized landings will increase if the fishing industry expands in the waters around the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. The increase in unauthorized landings will increase the accidental introduction of pest plants and animals (e.g. due to seeds on clothing, rats or insects from landed boats). Also, as the number of pest plants and insects, and also avian diseases and parasites, increase throughout all the Hawaiian Islands in the future, the frequency of "natural" (e.g. wind- or bird-borne) dispersal of non-native pests or diseases to remote islands such as Nihoa Island should increase, and more intensive monitoring will be necessary. There is certainly some seasonality in the food sources available to the Nihoa finches; Seabird eggs are available during their various breeding seasons, but are not in the constant supply year round (17). Also, vegetation changes due to rain (or lack thereof) probably cause the production of varying amounts of seeds and other plant parts (20), as well as insects. Drought could very well bring on a food shortage. In the case of the Nihoa finch, the numerical abundance of the species is less relevant to its endangered status than is its limited (approximately 156 acres) native range and fragile ecosystem (02,16), and the documented fluctuations in population numbers (02). APPROVED PLAN: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Passerines Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Portland, OR. Management Practices - 2 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 66 pp. This hardy little finch, a relect surviving from a time before the first Polynesian settlement of the main Hawaiian Islands, now flourishes on Nihoa Island, an outpost at the margin of its once much greater range. This population exists at astonishingly high density, a tribute to the bird's versatility at exploiting numerous food resources and to a total absence of predators and major avian diseases on the bird's insular habitat. The isolated island environment that fostered the evolution of this competitive adaptability also shielded the birds from mammalian predation and mosquito-borne diseases, two sources of mortality against which Nihoa finches have lost all effective defensives. Protecting Nihoa finches from these serious outside threats is the principal goal of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands Passerines Recovery Plan. Proposed recovery actions include: 1) preventing unauthorized access (especially via boat) to Nihoa Island; 2) preventing establishment of alien organisms (plant and animals) and setting up a plan to monitor the island and to eliminate such organisms should they reach the island; 3) preventing the outbreak of avian disease; 4) monitoring the species and its habitat; and 5) establishing a captive flock of Nihoa finches, should some calamity befall their present habitat. Introduction of Nihoa finches to other leeward or offshore Hawaiian islands was not considered by the plan and would probably not be practical, owing to the absence of other high islands free of rats. Maintaining these finches on only one island exposes them to a greater risk of extinction. Ongoing recovery actions are: (1) review of the Hawaiian Islands NWR Master Plan and (2) recent population surveys. Management Practices - 3
                                   (DRAFT) - References
                                   Species FINCH, NIHOA
                                  Species Id ESIS101042
                                      Date 14 MAR 96



     

References

***** REFERENCES FOR ALL NARRATIVES EXCEPT N-OCCURRENCE ***** 01 Bryan, W.A. 1917. Description of Telespiza ultima from Nihoa Island. Auk 34:70-72. 02 Sincock, J.L. and E. Kridler. 1977. The extinct and endangered endemic birds of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Unpub. ms. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Honolulu, HI. 111 pp. 03 Richardson, F. 1954. Report on the two native passerines of Nihoa Hawaii. Condor 56:224. 04 Berger, A.J. 1972. Hawaiian birdlife. The Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. 270 pp. 05 Banko, W.E. 1979. History of endemic Hawaiian birds specimens in museum collections. CPSU/UH Avian History Report 2. Coop. Nat. Park Res. Studies Unit, U.H. Manoa, Dept. of Botany, Honolulu. 80 pp. 06 Munro, G.C. 1960. Birds of Hawaii. Revised ed. C.E. Tuttle Co., Inc., Rutland, VT. 192 pp. 07 Vanderbilt, G. and R.M. de Schauensee. 1941. Zoological results of the Vanderbilt Nihoa Expedition. I. Summary of zoological explorations and the birds of Nihoa. Notulae Naturae, Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., No. 86:1-14. 08 Berger, A.J. 1981. Hawaiian birdlife. 2nd Ed. The Univ. Press of HI, Honolulu. 260 pp. 09 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Recovery plan for the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands passerines. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., Portland, OR. 66 pp. 10 Banks, R.C. and R.C. Laybourne. 1977. Plumage sequence and taxonomy of Laysan and Nihoa finches. Condor 79(3):343-348. 11 Wilson, S.B. 1890. On a new finch from Midway Island, North Pacific. Ibis 33(2):339-341. 12 American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Checklist of North American birds. 6th ed. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, KS. 877 pp. 13 Rothschild, (L.) W. 1893-1900. The avifauna of Laysan and the neighboring islands: with a complete history to date of the birds of the Hawaiian Possessions. R.H. Porter, 7 Princes St., London. 3 parts. 320 pp. 14 Raikow, R.J. 1976. Pelvic appendage myology of the Hawaiian honeycreepers (Drepanididae). Auk 93:774-492. 15 Raikow, R.J. 1977. Pectoral appendage myology of the Hawaiian honeycreepers (Drepanididae). Auk 94:331-342. 16 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. Recovery news: plan approved for three songbirds of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Endangered Species Tech. Bull. 10(2):8-10. 17 Clapp, R.B., E. Kridler and R.R. Fleet. 1977. The natural history of Nihoa Island, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Atoll Res. Bull., No. 207. Smithsonian Inst., Wash., D.C. 147 pp. 18 Amerson, Jr., A.B. 1971. The natural history of French Frigate Shoals, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Atoll Res. Bull., No. 150. Smithsonian Inst., Wash., D.C. 383 pp. 19 Kramer, R.J. 1961. Report on a trip to Nihoa Island. Unpub. 20 Kramer, R.J. and J.W. Beardsley. 1962. A report on a survey trip References - 1 (DRAFT) - References Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 to the Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge, Entomological report. Unpub. HI Dept. of Fish and Game, Honolulu, HI. 17 pp. 21 Woodside, D.H. and R.J. Kramer. 1961. A report on a survey trip to the Hawaiian Islands National Wildlife Refuge, Unpub. report. Hawaii Dept. of Fish and Game, Honolulu, HI. 31 pp. 22 Wetmore, A. 1924. A warbler from Nihoa. Condor 26:177-178. 23 Munroe, G.C. 1941. Birds of Hawaii and adventures in bird study- an ocean cruise. 'Elepaio 2(6):41-43. 24 Throp, J. 1970. The Laysan finch bill in the Honolulu Zoo. 'Elepaio 31(4):31-34. 25 Conant, S. 1983. Ecological requirements of the Nihoa Millerbird and the Nihoa finch, including an analysis of management options for the millerbird. Unpubl. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Honolulu, 47 pp. 26 Conant, S. 1985. Recent observations on the plants of Nihoa Island, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Pac. Sci. 39(2):135-149. 27 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Report-biological investigations: Nihoa, Necker, Laysan, Lisianski, Pearl and Hermes Reef, Midway. Unpub. Honolulu Office, HI. 16 pp. 28 Conant, S. 1985. Trip report-expedition to Laysan Island. Unpub. Dept. of Gen. Sci. Univ. of HI at Manoa, Honolulu. 5 pp. 29 Ely, C.A. and R.C. Clapp. 1973. The natural history of Laysan Island, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Atoll Res. Bull., No. 171. Smithsonian Inst., Wash. D.C. 361 pp. 30 Walker, R.L. 1964. Unpubl. field notes, HI Dept. of Fish and Game, Honolulu. 35 pp. 31 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1977. Hawaiian and Pacific Islands National Wildlife Refuge Complex narrative report CY 1977. Unpub., Honolulu Office, HI. 32 Sincock, J. 1978. 1978 endangered species population data for Leewards. Unpubl. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Correspondence to Barry Brady, Honolulu Office, HI. 33 Fefer, S. 1985. Summary of Hawaiian Islands NWR endangered species surveys conducted in 1985 for Endangered Species Technical Bulletin. Unpubl. U.S. Fiah and Wildl. Serv. Memo, Honolulu Off., 2 pp. 34 Berger, A.J. 1980. Longevity in Hawaiian honeycreepers in captivity. Wilson Bull. 92(2):263-264. 35 Willett, G. 1945. The type of Telespiza ultima Bryan. Auk 62:139. 36 Amadon, D. 1950. The Hawaiian honeycreepers (Aves, Drepaniidae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 95:155-262. 37 Delacour, J. 1928. Les oiseaux des iles Hawaii. Oiseaux 6:183-190; 7:210-221; 8:242-251. 38 van Riper, S. and C. van Riper. 1985. A summary of known parasites and diseases recorded from the avifauna of the Hawaiian Islands. In Hawai'is terrestrial ecosystems preservation and management. CPSU/UH, Honolulu, HI. 584 pp. 39 Conant, S. 1983. Unpubl. data from 1983 expedition to Nihoa. 40 Conant, S., M.S. Collins and C.J. Ralph. 1981. Effects of observers using different methods upon the total population estimates of two resident island birds. Studies in avian biol. No. 6:377-381. References - 2 (DRAFT) - References Species FINCH, NIHOA Species Id ESIS101042 Date 14 MAR 96 ***** REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY ***** 01 Sincock, J.L. and E. Kridler. 1977. The extinct and endangered endemic birds of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Unpub. manus. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Honolulu, HI. 111 pp. 02 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Recovery plan for the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands passerines. U.S. Fish and Wildl. Serv., Portland, OR. 66 pp. 03 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1985. Recovery news: plan approved for three songbirds of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Endangered Species Tech. Bull. 10(2):8-10. 04 Clapp, R.B., E. Kridler and R.R. Fleet. 1977. The natural history of Nihoa Island, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Atoll Res. Bull., No. 207. Smithsonian Inst., Wash., D.C. 147 pp. 05 Amerson, Jr., A.B. 1971. The natural history of French Frigate Shoals, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Atoll Res. Bull., No. 150. Smithsonian Inst., Wash., D.C. 383 pp. 06 Olson, S.L. and H.F. James. 1982. Prodromus of the fossil avifauna of the Hawaiian Island. Smithsonian Contrib. to Zoo. #365 Smithsonian Inst. Press, City of Washington. 59 pp. References - 3