(DRAFT) - Taxonomy
                              Species TORTOISE, DESERT
                                Species Id ESIS156001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



TAXONOMY

NAME - TORTOISE, DESERT OTHER COMMON NAMES - TORTOISE and DESERT ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Reptiles PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - CHORDATA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - REPTILIA, ORDER AND SUBORDER - TESTUDINES, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - TESTUDINIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - XEROBATES, SPECIES AND SSP - AGASSIZII, SCIENTIFIC NAME - XEROBATES AGASSIZII AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Desert Tortoise Xerobates agassizii (Cooper, 1863) KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Reptile PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Reptilia ORDER: Testudines FAMILY: Testudinidae The desert tortoise has a high-domed shell, usually with prominent growth lines on shields of both carapace and plastron. Carapace is horn-colored or brown, often with yellowish centers in the laminae. Plastron is yellow shaded with brown along the laminae edges. Average shell length is 6 to 14 1/2 inches. The head is relatively small and rounded in front with alveolar ridges of the upper jaws forming a sharp angle. The hind legs are cylindrical and columnar. Front legs are covered with large conical scales. Both legs and neck are retractile with limbs completely closing the shell opening when drawn in. The male has a longer tail, longer gular projections at the fore end of the plastron, more thickened nails, and more concave plastron than the female (01). The desert tortoise (Xerobates agassizii) was first described by Cooper in 1863 and was one of four species in the genus Gopherus. It was considered a monotypic species and the Beaver Dam Slope population Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species TORTOISE, DESERT Species Id ESIS156001 Date 14 MAR 96 is not currently recognized by some as being taxonomically distinct. However, due to the restricted movement of tortoises, it is partially isolated, with a limited amount of gene flow possible between the Utah and Arizona populations. The genus Xerobates has been resurrected for this species and is separated from Gopherus by head and skull morphology (07). The scientific names used for Xerobates agassizii include Gopherus agassizii, Gopherus agassizi, and Scaptochelys agassizii. Taxonomy - 2
                                  (DRAFT) - Status
                              Species TORTOISE, DESERT
                                Species Id ESIS156001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



STATUS

Coded Status T: Federal Threatened Pest Commercial COMMENTS ON STATUS - U.S. STATUSES AND LAWS: The Beaver Dam Slope, UT, population of the desert tortoise (Xerobates agassizii) has been designated a Threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (50 CFR 17.11; P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1540), as amended. Critical Habitat has been designated in Washington County, UT (50 CFR 17.95(c)). This species is protected by the Lacey Act (P.L. 97-79, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) which makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, or offspring): (1) in interstate or foreign commerce if taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any State law or regulation; or (2) if taken or possessed in violation of any U.S. law, treaty, or regulation or in violation of Indian tribal law. It is also unlawful to possess any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, and offspring) within the U.S. territorial or special maritime jurisdiction (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7) that is taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, foreign law, or Indian tribal law. RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCIES: USFWS -Responsible for the management/recovery, listing, and law enforcement/protection of this species. BLM -Responsible for the law enforcement/protection of this species with applicable State and Federal laws on public land under their control (43 CFR 4140). Also responsible for management/recovery on Bureau of Land Management lands. All Federal agencies have responsibility to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by that agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of Critical Habitat (50 CFR 402), and to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of the species. Status - 1 (DRAFT) - Status Species TORTOISE, DESERT Species Id ESIS156001 Date 14 MAR 96 STATE STATUSES AND LAWS: STATE: Utah DESIGNATED STATUS: Protected, Recognized Threatened ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife Resources. STATE STATUTE: Proclamation of Wildlife Board for amphibiians and Reptiles Sept. 1, 1979, Utah Code Annotated, 23-13-2 to 23-13-4. INTERNATIONAL STATUSES, TREATIES, AND AGREEMENTS: CITES-II, February 4, 1977. ECONOMIC STATUSES: The species provided some commercial value in the past by sale as pets. It is now considered a competitor with cattle and sheep for rangeland by local ranchers. 77/02/22:42 FR 10462/10487 - Implementation CITES - CITES II 78/08/23:43 FR 37662/37665 - Proposed listing as Endangered w/ CH 79/03/06:44 FR 12382/12384 - Suppl. info. for Critical Habitat desig. 79/12/07:44 FR 70680/70682 - Repropose to determine Critical Habitat 80/08/20:45 FR 55654/55666 - Final Rule, Threatened with Critical Hab. 85/07/22:50 FR 29901/29909 - Five year review Status - 2
     

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS

HABITAT - TERRESTRIAL TERRESTRIAL LAND USE - Transportation, communications, and Util Shrub and Brush Rangeland COMMENTS ON HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS - The Beaver Dam Slope is the northeastern extreme of the Mojave Desert as it extends into Utah. The climate of the St. George area, just east of the Beaver Dam Slope area, is arid and experiences a wide degree of temperature fluctuation during the year. Annual precipitation is approximately 7.5 inches with the greatest monthly average in March (0.9 inches) and the least in June (0.2 inches). Annual temperature average in January is 38 F. The mean maximum and minimum temperatures are 116 F and -11 F, respectively (01). The Beaver Dam Slope is composed of Quaternary alluvial deposits, with a few Precambrian and Carboniferous outcrops. In many areas, conglomerate caliche layers up to five feet thick have formed. The area is dissected by several washes draining to the west and southwest and eventually into a major streambed, the Beaver Dam Wash. The slope ranges from 2400 to 4000 feet in elevation (01). Based on dominant plant species, five major vegetation zones may be recognized in the area. Tortoises are most often associated with the joshua tree (Yucca brevifolia) - creosote (Larrea divaricata) and creosote - bromegrass (Bromus spp.) zones. However, one concentration of tortoises occurs west of the Beaver Dam Wash in a zone of scant vegetation characterized by Eriogonum species and a variety of annuals (01). Annual vegetation is important which is why this species occurs in areas with very little perennial vegetation. The burrowing habits of tortoises represent unique adaptations to their extreme environment. Burrows function primarily as thermo-regulatory aids and may also aid in water conservation and protection from predators. Burrow use is temporary, generally receiving only a few weeks use, and burrows are usually located near bushes. Winter dens, located in the banks of washes, are basically hibernacula where tortoises congregate during cold weather (01). The holes in banks of washes are not created by tortoises, but rather are created and maintained by periodic flooding. Suitable wintering sites may limit tortoises throughout this region and, in part, explain a disjunct distributional pattern. Tortoises may increase the size of these den sites. Utah Highway 91 was used extensively by tourists prior to the completion of a freeway shortcut through the Virgin River Canyon in the early 1970's. Old Mormon Road also crosses through an area of known desert tortoise occurrence providing human access and ORV accessiability. Habitat Associations - 1
                                (DRAFT) - Food Habits
                              Species TORTOISE, DESERT
                                Species Id ESIS156001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



FOOD HABITS

TROPHIC LEVEL - HERBIVORE LIFESTAGE FOOD FOOD PART General Deciduous Shrubs-Leaves/Twigs General Deciduous Shrubs-Flowers/Fruit/Seed General Arthropods General Reptilia General Aves General Mammalia General Poaceae General General Forb Leaves/Stems General Forb Flowers/Fruit/Seed Food Habits - 1
                         (DRAFT) - Environment Associations
                              Species TORTOISE, DESERT
                                Species Id ESIS156001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

G = General A = Adult LIM = Limiting RA = Resting Adult J = Juvenile FA = Feeding Adult RJ = Resting Juvenile BA = Breeding Adult FJ = Feeding Juvenile P = Pupae L = Larvae E = Egg RL = Resting Larvae FL = Feeding Larvae
LIFESTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS G Terrestrial Features: Burrows Environment Associations - 1
                               (DRAFT) - Life History
                              Species TORTOISE, DESERT
                                Species Id ESIS156001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



LIFE HISTORY

FOOD HABITS: Desert tortoises are herbivorous and are opportunistic feeders, although distinct preferences for certain plants may be exhibited. One study found that 3 species of grasses (Aristida, Tridens, and Bromus) accounted for 61% of the diet (01). Although their diet included a wide variety of grasses, sedges (Carex sp.), forbs and certain shrubs, only the succulent portions such as leaves and flowering parts are eaten. Sand, bird feathers, mammal hairs, snake and lizard skins, and arthropods were also found in some scats but represented only incidental food items. Coombs (1977) found the annual grass Bromus rubens and the annual forb cutleaf filaree (Erodium cicutarium) to be the chief foods (02). The native perennial grass Muhlenbergia porteri was considered an important food when available, providing both protein and moisture even in late summer and early fall. However, Minden (1981) found little Aristida and Muhlenbergia in the diet. He determined Bromus to be an important food item throughout the spring. Various perennial grasses seemed of moderate importance in early spring, but were replaced by heavy use of forbs in May and June (03). This may reflect energy available in perennial versus annual seeds. Annual seeds, for the most part, yield higher energy per unit volume than perennial seeds. In a 1980 study, Minden found that a milkvetch, Astragalus nuttalianus, an annual forb, was the preferred spring forage, making up 59% of the diet (04). Peak tortoise activity usually coincides with the abbreviated period of annual bloom. During the blooming period, tortoises apparently consume enough annual forage to sustain them through the summer aestivation and winter dormancy periods (01). The spring bloom is considered critically important to tortoise survival and reproduction. Normal reproduction and recruitment to the population probably depend upon an optimum combination of nutrients and moisture in both spring and fall forage (01,02). Forage must be sufficient to allow females to accumulate energy reserves for egg production. In dry springs, tortoises may rely on fat reserves accumulated during the previous spring (01). HOME RANGE/TERRITORY: Little is known of the territorial behavior or home range of the desert tortoise. However, ranges of 11 adult female wild tortoises in the spring of 1980 varied from 8.53 ha (21.07 acres) to 0.59 ha (1.46 acres) with a mean of 3.67 ha (9.03 acres) (04). In April, tortoises remained near winter dens while foraging and returned to them for overnight shelter. But as the season progressed, they ventured further away and began utilizing summer burrows (04). PERIODICITY: Peak tortoise activity usually coincides with the annual bloom in May-June. They apparently consume enough annual forage during this period to sustain them through summer aestivation and winter dormancy (01). Temperature determines daily activity. Tortoises appear to be active when air temperatures are between 10 C (50 F) and 32 C (90 F), or when soil temperatures are 18 C (64 F) to 48 C (118 F) (04). On Life History - 1 (DRAFT) - Life History Species TORTOISE, DESERT Species Id ESIS156001 Date 14 MAR 96 hot days, foraging is frequently interrupted by short periods of rest in the shade, with retreat to burrows as temperature rises or falls beyond preferred levels. By late June, extreme heat reduces tortoise activity significantly, limiting it to early morning, and most of their time is spent in the shelter of summer burrows (04). MIGRATION PATTERNS: The desert tortoise is non-migratory. COVER/SHELTER REQUIREMENTS: Tortoises use 2 types of cover sites in Utah: winter dens and summer burrows. Winter dens are permanent hibernacula where tortoises congregate during cold weather. They are located in the banks of washes under exposed outcroppings. They are generally occupied from October-April and are excavated 5-30 feet into gravel banks (01). Minden found den openings averaged 28 cm (11 in.) in height and 85 cm (33.5 in.) in width (04). Den lengths may be up to 9 meters (30 ft.). Twelve different plant species were found growing near dens, but none appeared to occur more often than another. Over 50% of den openings faced in directions between and including east and south (04). Tortoises modify these sites but many are natural crevices. Summer burrows are dome-shaped hollows often located under bushes (01). They are used by individual tortoises overnight, during brief periods of inactivity, and for extended periods to escape extreme heat and drought. Burrows are ephemeral and generally receive only a few weeks use (04). They are 1-4 feet deep and show seasonal variation, being relatively shallow in May and deeper in June as temperatures increase (04). REPRODUCTIVE SITE REQUIREMENTS: Nests are dug in sandy soil using either the hind feet, or the front legs and then the hind feet. Nests have measured 23 cm (9 in.) in diameter at the top, 18 cm (7 in.) at the bottom and 15 cm (6 in.) deep (01). However, depth of the nest appears to vary with size of the female and hardness of the soil. Nest sites usually resemble undisturbed ground, and females often urinate in the nest before and after filling it (01). REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: Little is known regarding reproduction under natural conditions. Peak breeding activity occurs in March-April and nesting occurs in May-July (01). Multiple clutches occur in captive tortoises; it is believed the same may be true of wild individuals. Clutch size varies from 2-14 eggs with 5-6 as the average. Larger females tend to have larger clutches (01). Incubation is 90-120 days in the wild, and hatching occurs August-October (01). Hatchlings appear to dig or find an existing burrow shortly after hatching and become dormant, ignoring food and water. In some cases eggs do not hatch in the fall but remain over the winter, with hatchlings emerging in the spring (01). PARENTAL CARE: No specific information on parental care is available. However, it appears that shortly after hatching the young dig or find an Life History - 2 (DRAFT) - Life History Species TORTOISE, DESERT Species Id ESIS156001 Date 14 MAR 96 existing burrow and begin dormancy (01). Vaughan (06) observed two different cases where a female tortoise aggressively defended her eggs against Gila monsters. POPULATION BIOLOGY: Few exact population parameters of the desert tortoise are known except that the species is long-lived and, according to a 1980 study by Minden, exhibits a balanced sex ratio (04,05). The latest survey revealed a total of 82 tortoises over a 30 square mile area (04,05). Past studies show the Beaver Dam Slope population to be declining steadily (01). Limiting factors include habitat destruction, competition for food with cattle and sheep, a low recruitment rate, few eggs produced, and slowness in reaching sexual maturity (01). Natural predation by the kit fox, coyote, and Gila monster may be significant depending on the age class of the tortoise involved (05, 06). The objective under management is to restore the Beaver Dam Slope population to non-endangered status by establishing and maintaining a viable, self-sustaining population (01). SPECIES INTERRELATIONSHIPS: Woodrats (Neotoma lepida) are common commensals, building their nests in the mouths of tortoise dens (05). Other small vertebrates and invertebrates may also inhabit burrows. The kit fox (Vulpes macrotis) often utilizes tortoise burrows and may be the most important predator. Coyotes (Canis latrans) and Gila monsters may also be significant predators of the tortoise (05). OTHER LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTORS: None. Life History - 3
                           (DRAFT) - Management Practices
                              Species TORTOISE, DESERT
                                Species Id ESIS156001
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Off-Road Vehicles Beneficial Restricting/regulating human disturbance of populations Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Road Maintainance Actions Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Agricultural Practice Beneficial Creating Artificial Habitat/Nesting Structure Beneficial Reforestation Beneficial Transplanting wild animals Beneficial Transplanting Wild Eggs/Wild Seeds Beneficial Restricting Poaching Beneficial Controlling/Removing Native Vertebrates Beneficial Controlling/Removing Domestic Animals Adverse Collecting Existing Collecting Adverse Commercial Exploitation Existing Commercial Exploitation Adverse Inherent Reproductive Characteristics Existing Inherent Reproductive Characteristics Adverse Predation Existing Predation Adverse Competition Existing Competition Adverse Grazing Existing Grazing COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - The Beaver Dam Slope has a long history of abusive grazing practices (grazing). Both sheep and cattle used the area annually from the late 1800's until the late 1960's, resulting in clear overgrazing of tortoise habitat. A 1948 study reported that tortoises had only a 30-40 day spring green period before sheep swept the area clean of annuals (01,02). Cattle are now greatly reducing the availability of perennial grasses. Dietary overlap of 37.7 percent between tortoises and cattle has been reported (competition) (02). Grazing by domestic animals has also resulted in trampling and actual destruction of food plants, shelter, and denning sites. Overcollecting of tortoises for sale as pets has been a major detrimental factor. Prior to the early 1970's it was common practice for service station operators to collect and sell tortoises to tourists. Desert tortoises are generally believed to be long-lived, slow to reach sexual maturity, produce relatively few eggs, and have a low recruitment rate, increasing their vulnerability to other factors. Natural predation by the kit fox, coyote, and Gila monster may be a significant factor in the decline of the species, depending on age class involved (01). UNAPPROVED PLAN: Management Practices - 1 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species TORTOISE, DESERT Species Id ESIS156001 Date 14 MAR 96 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. The Desert Tortoise Recovery Plan (Beaver Dam Slope Population). Agency Draft. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, CO. 63 pp. Recovery actions proposed for the Beaver Dam Slope population of the desert tortoise include: 1) Determining its status and specific population trends for all age groups. 2) Determining specific habits and habitat requirements for all age groups by monitoring environmental characteristics of high and low tortoise use areas, and conducting studies on the life history of the species. Needed studies include; hatching success, age and growth rates, clutch size, and age to sexual maturity. 3) Determining extrinsic factors limiting the population. Limiting factors on the population will be studied, including: impacts on habitat and food supply by grazing; the effects of predation; and the extent of ORV caused damage or mortality and need to control or restrict ORV use. Annual vegetation, versus perennial, production is imperative to the desert tortoise survival. The controlling of future agricultural practices towards annual vegetation may be desirable. 4) The existing Beaver Dam Slope population and habitat within the designated Critical Habitat area will be preserved and protected. This also includies the restricting of surface-disturbing activities (such as limiting human access by controlling/restricting road maintenance activities and agricultural practices) when tortoises are most active. Utah Highway 91 was used extensively by tourists prior to the completion of a freeway shortcut through the Virgin River Canyon in the early 1970's. At one time gas station attendents collected and sold tortoises to tourists along this route. Old Mormon Road also crosses through an area of known desert tortoise occurrence providing human access and ORV accessability. 5) Current habitat will be improved, possibly by enlarging or creating new dens, providing water for tortoise use, managing livestock to allow improvement of desert tortoise habitat, and improving vegetative composition and biomass. Mortality may be controlled by controlling or reducing predator populations within the Critical Habitat. Tortoise population numbers may be augmented by some artificial hatching of wild eggs. Management Practices - 2
                                   (DRAFT) - References
                                 Species TORTOISE, DESERT
                                  Species Id ESIS156001
                                      Date 14 MAR 96



     

References

*****REFERENCES FOR ALL NARRATIVES EXCEPT N-OCCURRENCE***** 01 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Desert Tortoise Recovery Plan (Beaver Dam Slope Population). Agency Draft. Prepared by Region 6, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver, CO. 02 Coombs, E.M. 1977. Wildlife observations of the hot desert region, Washington Co., UT, with emphasis on reptilian species and their habitat in relation to livestock grazing. UT Division of Wildlife Resources. Unpub. report. 03 Minden, R.L. and S.M. Keller. 1981. Population analysis of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) of the Beaver Dam Slope, Washington Co., UT. UT State Dept. of Nat. Resources and Energy. No. 81-14. 49 pp. 04 Minden, R.L. 1980. Investigations of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) on the Beaver Dam Slope, Washington Co., UT. UT State Division of Wildl. Resources No. 80-21. 44 pp. 05 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1980. Environmental assessment; determination that the Beaver Dam Slope population of the desert tortoise is a Threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 with Critical Habitat. U.S. Dept. Interior, Washington, D.C. 25 pp. 06 Vaughan, S. 1986. Observations of aggressive behavior in desert tortoises. Southwest. Nat. In press. 07 Bramble, D.M. 1986. Systematics, biogeography and evolution of gopher tortoise. Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting and Symposium of the Desert Fish Council. *****REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY***** 01 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Desert Tortoise Recovery Plan (Beaver Dam Slope Population). Agency Draft. Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 6, Denver, CO. 31 pp. 02 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1980. Environmental assessment; determination that the Beaver Dam Slope population of the desert tortoise is a Threatened species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 with Critical Habitat. U.S. Dept. Interior. Washington, D.C. 25 pp. References - 1