(DRAFT) - Taxonomy
                          Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS
                                Species Id ESIS252008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



TAXONOMY

NAME - PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS OTHER COMMON NAMES - PUPFISH and COMANCHE SPRINGS ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Fish PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - CHORDATA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - OSTEICHTHYES, ORDER AND SUBORDER - ATHERINIFORMES, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - CYPRINODONTIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - CYPRINODON, SPECIES AND SSP - ELEGANS, SCIENTIFIC NAME - CYPRINODON ELEGANS AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Comanche Springs Pupfish Cyprinodon elegans Baird and Girard, 1853 KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Fish PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Osteichthyes ORDER: Atheriniformes FAMILY: Cyprinodontidae Cyprinodon elegans was originally described by Baird and Girard from a collection of 32 individuals taken from "Comanche Springs, Rio Grande del Norte (Rio Bravo)" by John H. Clark during the U.S. and Mexican Boundary Surveys (01,02). This location is now known as "Comanche Springs" and is inside the city limits of Fort Stockton, Pecos County, TX. The type material was placed into the U.S. National Museum (catalog numbers 686 and 687) (02). The presence of Cyprinodon elegans in the Balmorhea region was first reported by Miller (03) by reference to a population inhabiting the "Phantom Lake" area. The Comanche Springs pupfish, Cyprinodon elegans, is one of the two most distinctive members of the genus Cyprinodon (the other being the Federally endangered Devil's Hole pupfish, Cyprinodon diabolis) (04). It possesses a peculiar speckled color pattern in males not found in any other member of its genus. Also, individuals possess a comparatively streamlined body shape in contrast to other Cyprinodon Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 species and lack the vertical bars on the sides of their bodies that are found in most other Cyprinodon (04,05,06). Comanche Springs pupfish are small fishes. Individuals attain a maximum size of about 50 mm SL (standard length) (04,05,07). Cyprinodon elegans belongs to the "C. variegatus" species complex of Cyprinodon (08) and is apparently the most divergent Cyprinodon among the species inhabitaing the Pecos River drainage (09). There is significant intraspecific variation within the species. Cyprinodon elegans from Comanche Springs are distinct from populations near the Balmorhea area (05); and populations from the Phantom Springs show local differentiation from populations inhabiting Toyah Creek; as well as near San Solomon Springs, which appear intermediate in a number of meristic and morphological characteristics (05). Specimens of Comanche Springs pupfish are maintained at the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology (UMMZ 120355, from Comanche Springs, Pecos County, TX), Tulane University (TU 97078), the University of Oklahoma Museum of Zoology (OMOZ, various lots from the Balmorhea area) (05) and the Texas Natural History Collection (TNHC) at the University of Texas (09,10). Photographs of both sexes of Cyprinodon elegans, as well as a schematic diagram of the Balmorhea springs and canal systems appear in Stevenson and Buchanan (11). Taxonomy - 2
                                  (DRAFT) - Status
                          Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS
                                Species Id ESIS252008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



STATUS

Coded Status E: Federal Endangered COMMENTS ON STATUS - U.S. STATUSES AND LAWS: The Comanche Springs pupfish (Cyprinodon elegans) has been designated an Endangered species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (50 CFR 17.11; P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1540), as amended. The species has this status wherever found including the State of Texas. This species is protected by the Lacey Act (P.L. 97-79, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) which makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, or offspring): (1) in interstate or foreign commerce if taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any State law or regulation; or (2) if taken or possessed in violation of any U.S. law, treaty, or regulation or in violation of Indian tribal law. It is also unlawful to possess any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, and offspring) within the U.S. territorial or special maritime jurisdiction (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7) that is taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, foreign law, or Indian tribal law. RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCIES: USFWS -Responsible for the management/recovery, listing, and law enforcement/protection of this species. All Federal agencies have responsibility to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by that agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of Critical Habitat (50 CFR 402), and to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of the species. STATE STATUSES AND LAWS: STATE: Texas DESIGNATED STATUS: Endangered ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department STATE STATUTE: 31 Texas Administrative Code Sec. 57.133 (127.30. 003) July 1977 Status - 1 (DRAFT) - Status Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 INTERNATIONAL STATUSES, TREATIES, AND AGREEMENTS: The Comanche Springs pupfish is listed in the IUCN Red Data Book, Vol. 4, 1977; and is also listed by the Convention on Nature Protection and Wildlife Preservation in the Western Hemisphere, 1970. ECONOMIC STATUSES: This species has value to naturalists and has a value as a component of Texas' natural heritage of biotic diversity. 67/03/11:32 FR 04001/ - Listing as Endangered 79/05/21:44 FR 29565/29577 - Five year review 85/07/22:50 FR 29901/29909 - Five year review Status - 2
     

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS

HABITAT - AQUATIC INLAND AQUATIC LAND USE - Transportation, communications, and Util Cropland and Pasture Herbaceous Rangeland Streams and Canals Reservoirs NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY CODES NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Riverine, upper perennial SB3 Riverine, upper perennial AB1 COMMENTS ON HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS - The Comanche Springs pupfish inhabits the artesian springs and their outflows in the Balmorhea area of Reeves County, TX. This system of interconnected springs, seeps, and their outflows have been markedly altered into an irrigation network of concrete-lined canals with swiftly flowing water and dredged earth-lined laterals (04,05,06, 13,11). For the most part, the irrigation canals provide little suitable habitat for the species (04,05,06,13,11,14). Moreover, water distribution from the Phantom Springs Lake is often so extensive during the irrigation season (March until October) that little or no water occurs in the main canal near San Solomon Springs. During other times of the year (October through February), irrigation needs are less and the lateral canals are allowed to go dry (04,05,14). Also, in order to repair or redredge canals, flows to major areas suitable for Comanche Springs pupfish are diverted causing massive mortalities of the species (14). Where Comanche Springs pupfish are found, waters tend to be rather swiftly flowing, especially in comparison to areas in which other species of Cyprinodon occur (04,06,15). Comanche Springs pupfish are rarely found in habitats that are less than 10 cm deep, scoured or devoid of debris or vegetation such as Chara. Water emanating from the springs are stenothermal (approximately 22 to 26 degrees C) (07,11,12), however, exposure to ambient temperatures make the waters in which the species is found somewhat more eurythermal. Temperature preferences experiments indicate that habitat temperatures between 20 and 30 degrees C during August and September are optimal (07). Comanche Springs pupfish have a critical thermal maximum of approximately 40.5 degrees C (07). There is significant diurnal variation in the critical thermal maximum (higher in the afternoon than in the morning) (07). The small refugium within Balmorhea State Recreation Area has moderate, but stable flow and since it was constructed in 1974, supports several thousand Comanche Springs pupfish (04,13). Surrounding land use includes agricultural crop areas (cotton and sorghum) and pasture. The present range of the species mostly includes the system of irrigation canals interconnecting Phantom Springs located in easternmost Jeff Davis County, TX; San Solomon Springs, Giffin Springs and Toyah Creek, a flood-tributary of the Pecos River (Reeves County, TX) (01,04,05,06,07,08,09). Waters from Phantom Springs have been impounded to form Phantom Lake and these waters are diverted into Habitat Associations - 1 canals supporting an agricultural irrigation network during part of the year (01,05,08). During other parts of the year, waters from the Phantom Lake canal system are allowed to merge with the flow from San Solomon Springs. Their combined flow then enters one of two distributaries, one of which leads into a private irrigation supply lake known as Lake Balmorhea and the other, after merging with the flow leading from a canal from Giffen Spring, follows a parallel route with U.S. Highway 290 through the northern part of the town of Balmorhea to additional agricultural areas (01,05,08). Habitat Associations - 2
                                (DRAFT) - Food Habits
                          Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS
                                Species Id ESIS252008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



FOOD HABITS

TROPHIC LEVEL - OMNIVORE LIFESTAGE FOOD FOOD PART General Detritus General Diatoms General Algae General Arthropods General Crustaceans General Molluscs Food Habits - 1
                         (DRAFT) - Environment Associations
                          Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS
                                Species Id ESIS252008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

G = General A = Adult LIM = Limiting RA = Resting Adult J = Juvenile FA = Feeding Adult RJ = Resting Juvenile BA = Breeding Adult FJ = Feeding Juvenile P = Pupae L = Larvae E = Egg RL = Resting Larvae FL = Feeding Larvae
LIFESTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS G Aquatic Features: Springs [flowing] Environment Associations - 1
                               (DRAFT) - Life History
                          Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS
                                Species Id ESIS252008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



LIFE HISTORY

FOOD HABITS: The diet and food habits of the Comanche Springs pupfish are not known, however nearly all Cyprinodon are dietarily catholic and will consume a great variety of different foods including detritus, diatoms, algae, insects, various crustaceans and snails (16). HOME RANGE/TERRITORY: Male Comanche Springs pupfish maintain territories usually surrounding an algal mat (06). Territories are variable in size but average approximately 0.15 square meters (06). Territories are maintained as feeding territories in Cyprinodon and as sites of spawning and egg deposition (16). PERIODICITY: Little is known concerning the periodicity of the Comanche Springs pupfish. There is diurnal variation in the critical thermal maxima recorded for this species (higher in the afternoon than in the morning) (07). Activity levels are greater during warmer periods than cooler periods, as is typical for most poikilotherms (04). MIGRATION PATTERNS: The Comanche Springs pupfish is nonmigratory (04,14). COVER/SHELTER REQUIREMENTS: Comanche Springs pupfish apparently require water in the artificial canals that they inhabit to be 10 cm or greater in depth, with algae or debris as substrates (04,11). This species is not found in most swiftly flowing irrigation supply canals, especially those where significant scouring of the concrete linings have occurred (04). REPRODUCTIVE SITE REQUIREMENTS: Breeding occurs over territories maintained by male Comanche Springs pupfish (06). These territories are most often over algal mats and eggs are guarded by the males until hatching as males aggressively defend their territories against intruders (06). REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: Cyprinodon elegans breeds in swifter water than all other known Cyprinodon (06). Males orient and maintain position upstream from their territories until a female enters the territory and positions herself near the algal mat substrate (06). Courtship behaviors are similar to other species of Cyprinodon based upon the direct observations of Itzkowitz (06), as well as the existence of natural hybrids between C. elegans and the introduced C. variegatus (sheepshead minnows) as demonstrated by Stevenson and Buchanan (11). Eggs are apparently laid singly onto the algal mat substrates of the male's territory (06). Time for development until hatching, reproductive intervals and egg production of females are not known (04). Life History - 1 (DRAFT) - Life History Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 PARENTAL CARE: Male Comanche Springs pupfish actively guard their territories in which eggs are developing against all intruders (06). Because of the relatively swift waters they inhabit, males position themselves at the upstream head of their territory and drift with the water flow into an intruder where ritualized displays, chasing or biting will occur (06). POPULATION BIOLOGY: Comanche Springs pupfish are relatively short-lived fish (most individuals live approximately 1 year) (04). This aspect coupled with their reproductive biology causes large fluctuations in population numbers (04). Estimated adult population densities are approximately 1000 or more in the vicinity of San Solomon Springs and several thousand in the irrigation canals and the artificial refugium canal, respectively (04,05). Half of the known habitat of the Comanche Springs pupfish is dry (Comanche Springs and outflow within Fort Stockton, Pecos County, TX) and the remaining spring flows near Balmorhea (Reeves County, TX) are failing (04,12). As Phantom Springs are at a higher elevation than the other springs in the Balmorhea area, this spring is failing at a faster rate and is predicted to go dry within 50 years (04,12,17). A relatively large number of introduced fishes are found in Comanche Springs pupfish habitats. These species 1) compete for food and space with the Comanche Springs pupfish, and 2) threaten the genetic integrity of the Comanche Springs pupfish through introgressive hybridization (from hybridization with the introduced sheepshead minnow, C. variegatus) (04,11). SPECIES INTERRELATIONSHIPS: A number of fishes have been found to co-occur with the Comanche Springs pupfish. These include: Dorosoma cepedianum (gizzard shad), Astyanax mexicanus (Mexican tetra), Cyprinus carpio (carp-introduced species), Notemigonus crysoleucas (golden shiner-introduced species), Dionda episcopa (roundnose minnow), Hybognathus placitus (plains minnow), Notropis lutrensis (red shinner), Pimephales promelas (fathead minnow-introduced species), Pimephales vigilax (bullhead minnow), Ictalurus melas (black bullhead-introduced species), I. punctatus (channel catfish), Fundulus grandis (gulf killifish- introduced species), Fundulus zebrinus (plains killifish), Cyprinodon variegatus (sheepshead minnow-introduced species), Gambusia affinis (mosquitofish), G. nobilis (Pecos gambusia-Endangered species), G. geiseri (largespring gambusia-introduced species), Menidia beryllina (inland silversides-introduced species), Lepomis cyanellus (green sunfish), Lepomis humilis (orangespotted sunfish), L. megalotis (longear sunfish) and Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum (Rio Grande cichlid) (04,05,11,18). Since C. elegans appears relatively generalized in ecological needs, almost any co-occurring species of fish, either indigenous or introduced, potentially would exert competitive pressure on the pupfish population. Abundance and distribution data indicate C. elegans is more successful in the environment of Lake Balmorhea than C. variegatus. C. elegans has a long history in spring fed environments, while C. variegatus evolved in highly unstable, Life History - 2 (DRAFT) - Life History Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 eurythermal habitats. Presumably, C. elegans would be more successful than C. variegatus in stenothermal spring outflows, whereas C. variegatus would exclude C. elegans form presently occupied, unstable habitats upstream from Lake Balmorhea (04). The most abundant species in microhabitats supporting large numbers of C. elegans are Gambusia geiseri, Dionda episcopa, and G. nobilis near the heads of Phantom Lake and Giffin Springs. Canals fed by Giffin and San Solomon Springs support a variety of species in addition to those just mentioned, including Astyanax mexicanus, Ictalurus punctatus, G. affinis, Cichlasoma cyanoguttatum, Lepomis megalotis, and L. cyanellus. Depending on the microhabitat in these areas, relative abundance of pupfish ranges from absent to most abundant species present (04). A variety of fishes have been collected from Toyah Creek; these include all those mentioned above, excepting G. nobilis, and two additional species, Notropis lutrensis and Fundulus kansae (introduced species). The pupfish is generally uncommon in Toyah Creek. At Lake Balmorhea, C. elegans occurs almost entirely in or near a small area at the mouth of a cement irrigation flume. The flume empties into an inflow canal about 5 meters wide and 100 to 200 meters long, depending on lake level. The earthen canal supports a variety of other fishes, including Notropis lutrensis, Dionda episcopa, Pimephales promelas, Notemigonus crysoleucas, Cyprinus carpio, Astyanax mexicanus, Ictalurus punctatus, Gambusia nobilis, G. geiseri, G. affinis, Menidia beryllina, Cyprinodon variegatus, Fundulus grandis, Lepomis macrochirus, L. cyanellus and L. humilis. These species probably came from: 1) movement downstream from spring fed waters; 2) introductions by man from inland areas, possibly the Pecos River; and 3) transportations by man from the Gulf Coast and/or the lower Rio Grande. C. variegatus, first found in Lake Balmorhea in the middle 1960's, presumably was introduced from the Gulf Coast, and now occupies shallow areas around the lake. In the inflow canal where hybridization occurs, C. variegatus outnumbers C. elegans by more than 10 to 1. Introductions of coastal bait fishes continue. For example, Fundulus grandis was first taken in the summer of 1977; a rotenone operation of the lake conducted by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department in 1979 yielded large numbers of F. grandis (04). Cyprinodon elegans exhibits little premating reproductive isolation when artificially brought into contact with introduced pupfishes. This is shown clearly by the hybridization in Lake Balmorhea. Here, despite minor postmating isolation, the variegatus genome has been introgressed by elegans genes, and presumably, the elegans genome would be contaminated similarly if variegatus were established in upstream areas of the irrigation system. Potential hazards include "baitbucket" transport of other pupfishes (e.g., C. bovinus from Pecos County and C. peconsensis from the Pecos River), but the most likely source of danger continues to be introductions from the C. variegatus population in Lake Balmorhea. OTHER LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTORS: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is maintaining a culture of Cyprinodon elegans at the Dexter National Fish Hatchery, Dexter, New Mexico. This population came from an original stocking of 30 Life History - 3 (DRAFT) - Life History Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 individuals taken from an irrigation canal leading from Giffin Springs (04). Life History - 4
                           (DRAFT) - Management Practices
                          Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS
                                Species Id ESIS252008
                                   Date 14 MAR 96



MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Beneficial Maintaining/Controlling Water Flow Beneficial Controlling water levels Beneficial Developing/maintaining/protecting wetlands Beneficial Maintaining undisturbed/undeveloped areas Beneficial Restricting/regulating human use of habitats Beneficial Land Acquisition Beneficial Water Right Acquisition Beneficial Controlling pollution [thermal, chemical, physical] Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Pesticide Use Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Herbicide Use Beneficial Creating Artificial Habitat/Nesting Structure Beneficial Stocking captive-reared wild-strain animals Beneficial Controlling/Removing Exotic Vertebrates Adverse Hybridization Existing Hybridization Adverse Water Temperature Alteration Existing Water Temperature Alteration Adverse Strip mining Existing Strip mining Adverse Groundwater drawdown Existing Groundwater drawdown Adverse Irrigating Existing Irrigating Adverse Dredging Existing Dredging Adverse Competition Existing Competition Adverse Exotic/Feral/Introducted Species Existing Exotic/Feral/Introducted Species Adverse Existing COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - Cyprinodon elegans faces both generalized and specific threats. All large springs in west Texas have either failed or are failing due to excessive groundwater pumping (12). The cessation of flow from Comanche Springs during the mid-1950's eliminated approximately one- half of the historic habitat of this species (04,05,13). Additional habitat for the Comanche Springs pupfish has been lost due to irrigation related and agricultureal development modifications occurring in the Balmorhea region since 1975 (12). In addition to the significant decreases in available habitats for the species, other immediate threats to the survival of Cyprinodon elegans include competition pressure for limited resources and space from introduced species and the loss of genetic integrity as a result of hybridization with introduced sheepshead minnows (Cyprinodon variegatus) (04). The large flow of Comanche Springs was used as a water source as Management Practices - 1 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 early as 1875 to irrigate over 6,000 acres of farmland (10). Because of overutilization of the groundwater resources feeding Comanche Springs, the springs failed in 1955 (10) and the Comanche Springs population of Cyprinodon elegans was extripated (01,05,06,08). Extensive modification also took place in the Balmorhea region beginning during the mid-1870's (01,10). Many canals were dug for irrigation purposes and these modifications have continued through the present. Marshes, which are presumed to have supported large numbers of Comanche Springs pupfish were drained and spring flows diverted into nearby fields. Local pumping of groundwater on privately owned lands has exacerbated the decline of spring flows in this area and has apparently greatly reduced the size of the pupfish population (01). In an effort to increase the population size of the Comanche Springs pupfish, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department has built a refugium canal using spring flows from San Solomon Springs in their Balmorhea State Recreation Area (01,06). This refugium, was completed in 1974 and its stable flowing-water habitat supports a population of several thousand C. elegans (01,06). Half of the known habitat of the Comanche Springs pupfish is dry (Comanche Springs and outflow within Fort Stockton, Pecos County, TX) and the remaining spring flows near Balmorhea (Reeves County, TX) are failing (04,12). As Phantom Springs are at a higher elevation than the other springs in the Balmorhea area, this spring is failing at a faster rate and is predicted to go dry within 50 years (04,12,17). A relatively large number of introduced fishes are found in Comanche Springs pupfish habitats. These species 1) compete for food and space with the Comanche Springs pupfish, and 2) threaten the genetic integrity of the Comanche Springs pupfish through introgressive hybridization (from hybridization with the introduced sheepshead minnow, C. variegatus) (04,11). Since C. elegans appears relatively generalized in ecological needs, almost any co-occurring species of fish, either indigenous or introduced, potentially would exert competitive pressure on the pupfish population. Abundance and distribution data indicate C. elegans is more successful in the environment of Lake Balmorhea than C. variegatus. C. elegans has a long history in spring fed environments, while C. variegatus evolved in highly unstable, eurythermal habitats. Presumably, C. elegans would be more successful than C. variegatus in stenothermal spring outflows, whereas C. variegatus would exclude C. elegans form presently occupied, unstable habitats upstream from Lake Balmorhea (04). Cyprinodon elegans exhibits little premating reproductive isolation when artificially brought into contact with introduced pupfishes. This is shown clearly by the hybridization in Lake Balmorhea. Here, despite minor postmating isolation, the variegatus genome has been introgressed by elegans genes, and presumably, the elegans genome would be contaminated similarly if variegatus were established in upstream areas of the irrigation system. Potential hazards include "baitbucket" transport of other pupfishes (e.g., C. bovinus from Pecos County and C. peconsensis from the Pecos River), but the most likely source of danger continues to be introductions from the C. variegatus population in Lake Balmorhea. Management Practices - 2 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 APPROVED PLAN: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1981. Comanche Springs Pupfish (Cyprinodon elegans) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 26 pp. This Recovery Plan is currently being revised with no major changes in recovery actions. The well-being of the Comanche Springs pupfish and success of management efforts should be ensured by frequent monitoring. Monitoring should occur in several areas representative of the variety of habitats typically occupied by the species. Dates of sampling (July and January) are recommended as representative of periods of maximum and minimum temperatures and water usage for irrigation. Bank observation (between 1200 and 1600 hours) and seining are recommended monitoring methods. The habitat should be monitored simultaneously with the recording of such factors as: 1) Rate of water flow. 2) Abundance and type of aquatic vegetation. 3) Changes in shoreline vegetation. 4) Any other indication of changes in habitat quality. Enhancement of existing habitats is of highest priority. Many areas of marginally suitable habitat in irrigation ditches dry up when water is not needed for irrigation. These areas could be maintained as year-round pupfish habitat with intermittent flooding of these ditches during the non-irrigation season. Habitat could also be expanded at the head of Phantom Lake Spring by constructing a refugium canal through the now dry Phantom Lake. This would provide enhanced and enlarged habitat while having little impact on the amount of water available for irrigation. Cooperative agreements with private, State and Federal agencies in order to secure water rights to protect pupfish habitat is also recommended by the Plan. The captive population of Comanche Springs pupfish at Dexter NFH should be maintained for scientific research and as a reserve gene pool in the event that the wild population experiences a severe decline. Comanche Springs pupfish should be provided the full protection mandated by Federal and Texas laws. Finally, public awareness of the uniqueness of the pupfish should be increased through the preparation of information pamplets, interpretive programs, and a motion picture on its uniqueness and Endangered status of the entire aquatic ecosystem. Balmorhea State Recreation Area, with its Comanche Springs pupfish refugium, is and excellent site for public education. Although not mentioned in the Recovery Plan it may be desirable to reduce competition and the risk of hybridization by removing introduced exotic fish. Considering the surrounding agriculture and the use of irrigation it may also be helpful to the pupfish to control herbicides and pesticides that are known to be harmful to the food chain on which the pupfish depends. Land use zoning and the controlling of pollutants from agriculture and the recreational use of the area may in fact help maintain the water table and aid in the management of local wetlands and water flows. Oil and gas drilling may also be an activity in need of some monitoring in relation to pollutants and disturbance of the water table. Management Practices - 3 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department has constructed a small refugium at Balmorhea State Recreation Area to provide stable flowing water habitat for a small population of C. elegans. The refugium was completed in 1974 and now supports a population of several thousand pupfish. The Fish and Wildlife Service is maintaining a genetic stock of C. elegans at the Dexter National Fish Hatchery, Dexter, NM. The original stock consisted of about 30 individuals from an irrigation ditch fed by Giffin Springs. The pupfish at Dexter are being held there to provide fish for reintroduction efforts should a catastrophic loss of the natural population occur, and as a stock from which research specimenhs may be taken without affecting the wild population. Management Practices - 4
                                   (DRAFT) - References
                            Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS
                                  Species Id ESIS252008
                                      Date 14 MAR 96



     

References

***** REFERENCES FOR ALL NARRATIVES EXCEPT N-OCCURRENCE ***** 01 Baird and Girard. 1853. Descriptions of new species of fishes collected by Mr. John H. Clark, on the U.S. and Mexican Boundry Survey, under Lt. Col. Jas. D. Graham. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. (1852-1853) 6:387-390. 02 Girard, C. 1859. Ichthyology of the boundary. In: United States and Mexican Boundry survey, under the order of Lt. Col. W.H. Emory. Vol. 2(2): 85 pp., 41 pls. 03 Miller, R.R. 1951. (Review of) Alvarez, J., Claves para la determinacion de especies en los peces de las aguas continentales Mexicanas. Copeia 1951:103-104. 04 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1981. Comanche Springs pupfish (Cyprinodon elegans) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM. 25 pp. 05 Echelle, A.A. 1975. A multivariate analysis of variation in an Endangered fish, Cyprinodon elegans, with an assessment of populational status. Texas J. Sci. 26:529-538. 06 Itzkowitz, M. 1969. Observations on the breeding behavior of Cyprinodon elegans in swift water. Texas J. Sci. 21:229-231. 07 Gehlbach, F.R., C.L. Bryan and H.W. Reno. 1978. Thermal ecological features of Cyprinodon elegans and Gambusia nobilis, Endangered Texas fishes. Texas J. Sci. 30:99-101. 08 Liu, R.K. 1969. The comparative behavior of allopatric species (Teleostei: Cyprinodontidae: Cyprinodon). Unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Calif., Los Angeles. 09 Echelle, A.A. and A.F. Echelle. 1978. The Pecos River pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis n, sp. (Cyprinodontidae), with comments on its evolutionary origin. Copeia 1978: 569-582. 10 Mosier, D.T. 1985. Pers. comm. Asst. Curator, Texas Nat. Hist. Coll., Univ. of Texas, Austin. 11 Stevenson, M.M. and T.M. Buchanan. 1973. An analysis of hybridization between the cyprinodont fishes Cyprinodon variegatus and C. elegans. Copeia 1973: 682-692. 12 Brune, G. 1981. Springs of Texas. Vol. 1. Branch-Smith, Inc., Fort Worth, Texas. 13 Echelle, A.A. and C. Hubbs. 1978. Haven for Endangered pupfish. Texas Parks and Wildlife Mag. 36:9-11. 14 Davis, J.R. 1979. Die-offs of an Endangered pupfish, Cyprinodon elegans (Cyprinodontidae). Southwest. Nat. 24:534-536 15 Miller, R.R. 1961. Man and the changing fish fauna of the American southwest. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters 46: 365-404. 16 Kennedy, S.E. 1977. Life history of the Leon Springs pupfish, Cyprinodon bovinus. Copeia 1977:93-103. 17 White, W., H. Gale and S. Nye. 1938. Ground-water resources of the Balmorhea area in western Texas. Texas Water Development, Misc. Publ., No. 11. 18 Hubbs, C. 1982. Occurrence of exotic fishes in Texas waters. Pearce-Sellards Series, No. 36, Texas Memorial Mus. 19 pp. References - 1 (DRAFT) - References Species PUPFISH, COMANCHE SPRINGS Species Id ESIS252008 Date 14 MAR 96 ***** REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY ***** 01 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1981. Comanche Springs pupfish (Cyprinodon elegans) Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM. 25 pp. 02 Baird and Girard. 1853. Descriptions of new species of fishes collected by Mr. John H. Clark, on the U.S. and Mexican Boundry Survey, under Lt. Col. Jas. D. Graham. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. (1852-1853) 6:387-390. 03 Miller, R.R. 1961. Man and the changing fish fauna of the American southwest. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts and Letters 46: 365-404. 04 Hubbs, C. and A.A. Echelle. 1972. Endangered non-game fishes of the upper Rio Grande Basin. In: Rare and Endangered Wildlife of the Southwestern United States, New Mexico Game and Fish Dept., Santa Fe, NM. Pp 147-167. 05 Echelle, A.A. 1975. A multivariate analysis of variation in an Endangered fish, Cyprinodon elegans, with an assessment of populational status. Texas J. Sci. 26:529-538. 06 Echelle, A.A. and C. Hubbs. 1978. Haven for Endangered pupfish. Texas Parks and Wildlife Mag. 36:9-11. 07 Itzkowitz, M. 1969. Observations on the breeding behavior of Cyprinodon elegans in swift water. Texas J. Sci. 21:229-231. 08 Stevenson, M.M. and T.M. Buchanan. 1973. An analysis of hybridization between the cyprinodont fishes Cyprinodon variegatus and C. elegans. Copeia 1973: 682-692. 09 Gehlbach, F.R., C.L. Bryan and H.W. Reno. 1978. Thermal ecological features of Cyprinodon elegans and Gambusia nobilis, Endangered Texas fishes. Texas J. Sci. 30:99-101. References - 2