(DRAFT) - Taxonomy
                             Species DARTER, WATERCRESS
                                Species Id ESIS254011
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



TAXONOMY

NAME - DARTER, WATERCRESS OTHER COMMON NAMES - DARTER and WATERCRESS ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Fish PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - CHORDATA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - OSTEICHTHYES, ORDER AND SUBORDER - PERCIFORMES, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - PERCIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - ETHEOSTOMA, SPECIES AND SSP - NUCHALE, SCIENTIFIC NAME - ETHEOSTOMA NUCHALE AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Watercress Darter Etheostoma nuchale Howell and Caldwell, 1965 KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Fish PHYLUM: Chordata CLASS: Osteichthyes ORDER: Perciformes FAMILY: Percidae The watercress darter, Etheostoma nuchale, was first described by Howell and Caldwell in 1965 (01). It is a rather small (maximum SL=45 mm), robust darter of the subgenus Oligocephalus. It has a well developed frenum and a distinctly humped nape. The nape is naked medially, as are the head, breast, and prepectoral areas. The cheeks are largely naked with a few exposed or embedded scales along the posterior ventral margin of the eye while the opercle is scaled. The lateral line is moderately straight and incomplete. Total scales in the lateral line range from 35-42 (X=37) with 12-24 pored scales (X=17) and 15-27 unpored scales (X=20). The supratemporal and usually the infraorbital canals are incomplete and the branchiostegal membranes are moderately to narrowly conjoined. The spine and fin ray counts are as follows: dorsal VIII - IX (usually IX or X), 10-12; anal II (occasionally III), 6-8; pectoral (total of both sides) 22-24. Watercress darters are sexually dimorphic in color. The dorsum Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species DARTER, WATERCRESS Species Id ESIS254011 Date 13 MAR 96 and sides of both sexes are mottled with brown and black pigment which, in the female, may form vertical bands on the posterior part of the body. These bands are best developed ventrally. In males the bands are blue or bluish alternating with poorly defined red or orange bars. The breast and belly are white or yellowish white in females and bright red or reddish orange in males. Four to nine dorsal saddles may be present and most individuals have a median light stripe on the nape. There are three vertically aligned black spots at the base of the caudal fin. In males these are followed by two yellow to orange basicaudal spots. The spiny dorsal fin has an outer margin of blue followed by bands of red, blue, and red. This pattern is well developed in breeding males, faint in females. The soft dorsal fin of males displays the same pattern, while the anal, basal portion of the caudal, and the paired fins are blue. In females, the soft dorsal, anal, caudal, and paired fins are speckled with small brown spots. Keys and/or descriptions useful in identifying the fish are found in: 01,02,03,04,05,06, and 07. Taxonomy - 2
                                  (DRAFT) - Status
                             Species DARTER, WATERCRESS
                                Species Id ESIS254011
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



STATUS

Coded Status Alabama; Federal Endangered Alabama; State Listed Alabama; Unofficially Listed E: Federal Endangered COMMENTS ON STATUS - U.S. STATUSES AND LAWS: The watercress darter (Etheostoma nuchale) has been designated an Endangered species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (50 CFR 17.11; P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1540), as amended. The species has this status wherever found including the State of Alabama. This species is protected by the Lacey Act (P.L. 97-79, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) which makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, or offspring): (1) in interstate or foreign commerce if taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any State law or regulation; or (2) if taken or possessed in violation of any U.S. law, treaty, or regulation or in violation of Indian tribal law. It is also unlawful to possess any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, and offspring) within the U.S. territorial or special maritime jurisdiction (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7) that is taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, foreign law, or Indian tribal law. RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCIES: USFWS -Responsible for the management/recovery, listing, and law enforcement/protection of this species. All Federal agencies have responsibility to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by that agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of Critical Habitat (50 CFR 402), and to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of the species. STATE STATUSES AND LAWS: STATE: Alabama DESIGNATED STATUS: Nongame Wildlife Species ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Div. of Game and Fish STATE STATUTE: Game and Fish Reg. 87-GF-7. Status - 1 (DRAFT) - Status Species DARTER, WATERCRESS Species Id ESIS254011 Date 13 MAR 96 UNOFFICIAL LIST: Endangered, In: Mount, R.H. 1986. Vertebrate Animals of Alabama in Need of Special Attention. Ala. Agri. Expt. Sta., Auburn Univ. 124 pp. Endangered, In: Endangered and Threatened Plants and Animals of Alabama. Ala. Museum of Natural History, Bulletin No. 2. INTERNATIONAL STATUSES, TREATIES, AND AGREEMENTS: Listed in IUCN Red Data Book for Pices (1977). This species is also listed by the Convention on Nature Protection and Wildlife Preservation in the Western Hemisphere, 1970. ECONOMIC STATUSES: The watercress darter serves as a unique source of genetic material, as a biological indicator, and it enhances the diversity of the ecosystem in which it occurs. 70/08/25:35 FR 13519/ - Proposed Rule, listing as Endangered 70/10/13:35 FR 16047/16048 - Final Rule, listing as Endangered 75/05/16:40 FR 21499/21501 - Notice of intent, Critical Habitat 85/07/22:50 FR 29901/29909 - Five year review Status - 2
     

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS

HABITAT - AQUATIC INLAND AQUATIC LAND USE - Residential Commercial and Services Transportation, communications, and Util Streams and Canals NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY CODES NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Riverine, upper perennial UB1 Riverine, lower perennial UB1 Riverine, upper perennial AB3 Riverine, upper perennial AB2 Riverine, upper perennial AB1 Riverine, lower perennial AB3 Riverine, lower perennial AB2 Riverine, lower perennial AB1 Palustrine EM1 Palustrine AB5 COMMENTS ON HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS - The watercress darter, Etheostoma nuchale, is only found in spring basins, spring fed ponds, and the runs and creeks issuing from them (03,04,06,08,09). These springs and runs have bottoms of chert gravel in the areas of swifter current and silt in the areas of little current (08). Water temperature usually remains between 16 and 18 degrees C year round. The temperature preference and limits of this species are unknown, but it is likely that it prefers water that does not vary much from the 16-18 degree range of its spring habitat (10,11). Howell (01,08) notes that within the springs the darters are usually more abundant in areas of slow moving current with heavy growths of aquatic vegetation. At Glenn Spring the predominate vegetation is watercress, Nasturtiun, which fills backwater areas and lines the spring run. Rocks in the small spring basin are covered with unidentified aquatic moss and the lower portion of the spring run has a substantial growth of cattail, Typha. Thomas Spring lacks watercress. The dominate submerged vegetation here is Chara with some cattail lining a few areas of the shore. The spring pond also has heavy floating mats of Spirogyra, particularly in the summer months (08,11). Roebuck Spring has heavy mats of moss (Fissidens and Drepanocladus) covering rocks in the upper portion of the spring basin. The center of the basin is dominated by a stand of Potamogeton with floating clumps of Spirogyra. The spring creek contains stands of cattail, Ceratophyllum; bur reed, Sparganium; some Ludwigia; and cattail, Typha (11). The watercress darter is apparently dependent upon the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation for shelter from predators and egg deposition sites (11), and probably as a source of food items (such as aquatic insects and snails). Other environmental requirements of the watercress darter are unknown. Each of the springs where the watercress darters occur are adjacent to urbanized areas such as highways and residential Habitat Associations - 1 developments, and could be adversely affected by activities in these areas. Habitat Associations - 2
                                (DRAFT) - Food Habits
                             Species DARTER, WATERCRESS
                                Species Id ESIS254011
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



FOOD HABITS

TROPHIC LEVEL - CARNIVORE LIFESTAGE FOOD FOOD PART General Zooplankton General Arthropods General Crustaceans General Molluscs Food Habits - 1
                         (DRAFT) - Environment Associations
                             Species DARTER, WATERCRESS
                                Species Id ESIS254011
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

G = General A = Adult LIM = Limiting RA = Resting Adult J = Juvenile FA = Feeding Adult RJ = Resting Juvenile BA = Breeding Adult FJ = Feeding Juvenile P = Pupae L = Larvae E = Egg RL = Resting Larvae FL = Feeding Larvae
LIFESTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS G Aquatic Features: Pool areas G Aquatic Features: Springs [flowing] Environment Associations - 1
                               (DRAFT) - Life History
                             Species DARTER, WATERCRESS
                                Species Id ESIS254011
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



LIFE HISTORY

FOOD HABITS: Almost no information is available regarding the food habits of the watercress darter, Etheostoma nuchale. No stomach content analyses have been performed; however, Howell (10), examining x-rays of specimens for taxonomic purposes, noted the presence of small aquatic snails in their stomachs. Since almost all darters for which diets are known utilize aquatic insects and microcrustaceans (06), it is highly likely that they also comprise part of the diet of the watercress darter. Platania (12) reports that prey species include snails, crustaceans, and insect larvae. HOME RANGE/TERRITORY: Male watercress darters have been observed engaged in agonistic bouts and it is likely that they, at least, maintain either an individual space or a moving territory. Beyond that, nothing is known regarding territorial behavior or home range (11). PERIODICITY: The overwhelming majority of darters are diurnal (06) and observations indicate that the watercress darter is also (11). MIGRATION PATTERNS: Non-migratory (11). COVER/SHELTER REQUIREMENTS: The watercress darter, is dependent upon the presence of submerged aquatic vegetation for cover from predators, as a site for egg deposition (11), and as a source of aquatic insects and snails upon which the darter apparently feeds (08). There is no information available on the species of plants preferred as egg deposition sites (11). Destruction of aquatic vegetation by introduced grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, almost eradicated the Thomas Spring population (09,10,11). Recovery followed only with removal of the carp and reestablishment of the submerged vegetation (10,11). REPRODUCTIVE SITE REQUIREMENTS: The watercress darter lays its eggs on submerged aquatic vegetation in the springs and runs in which it lives (11). At Roebuck Spring darters have been observed laying their eggs in mats of aquatic moss (Fissidens and Drepanocladus) (11). Moss is limited at Glenn Spring and missing at Thomas Spring; thus, the darters must also use other types of vegetation for egg deposition; however, it is not known which plants they prefer. Also unknown are any preferences of depth, current, water temperature, and pH. REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: Only a limited amount of information is currently available on the reproductive behavior of the watercress darter. Observations show that during the reproductive season males will attempt to court any female they observe. Females not ready to spawn simply flee at the Life History - 1 (DRAFT) - Life History Species DARTER, WATERCRESS Species Id ESIS254011 Date 13 MAR 96 approach of a male (11). Courtship consists of the male closely following the female. When she stops he may rest his head against her nape or back, rest his body against hers, or display his fins. Any male observing the pair will attempt to displace the courting male. The largest male usually wins. Spawning females will accept any male who can displace the other males. Females select the spawning site which is off the bottom in submerged aquatic vegetation. The number of eggs layed per spawning and the number of times a female spawns per season are unknown. the extent of the breeding season is also unclear. Howell and Caldwell (01) found gravid females from March to July in samples from Glenn Spring. Observations by Stiles (11) at Roebuck Spring tend to support a mid-May to early July spawning period. PARENTAL CARE: Eggs are deserted at the completion of the spawning act and no parental care is given (11). POPULATION BIOLOGY: Little is known concerning the population biology of the watercress darter. One major limiting factor is the availability of submerged aquatic vegetation in the springs inhabited by the fish (09, 10,11). As mentioned in preceding sections, this vegetation is necessary for cover, feeding, and reproduction. Other limiting factors are uncertain. Howell (08) has theorized that the failure of a 1965 transplant into Prince Spring may have been due to competition with the redfin darter, Etheostoma whipplei. Other potential competitors and predators are unknown. No information is available on survival and mortality rates, sex ratio, longevity, rate of increase, etc. Current management plans center on protecting and expanding the existing populations. Increase in habitat by construction of a second pond at Thomas Spring and a low level dam in the spring creek at Roebuck Spring has resulted in an apparent increase in those populations (10), but a reduction in the outflow from Glenn Spring is resulting in a decrease in that population (10). Future plans may include transplants into other springs in the upper Warrior basin if sufficient life history data becomes available and existing populations build up to level that can support transplant efforts. SPECIES INTERRELATIONSHIPS: Introduction of herbivorous fishes, particularly the grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, into the watercress darter's spring habitat poses a serious threat to the fish (09,10,11). OTHER LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTORS: None. Life History - 2
                           (DRAFT) - Management Practices
                             Species DARTER, WATERCRESS
                                Species Id ESIS254011
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Beneficial Developing/maintaining stream structures Beneficial Maintaining/Controlling Water Flow Beneficial Developing/maintaining/protecting wetlands Beneficial Controlling water levels Beneficial Maintaining undisturbed/undeveloped areas Beneficial Land Acquisition Beneficial Creating Artificial Habitat/Nesting Structure Beneficial Reforestation Beneficial Controlling/Removing Exotic Vertebrates Adverse Highway/Railroads Existing Highway/Railroads Adverse Soil compaction by heavy equipment in mine areas Existing Soil compaction by heavy equipment in mine areas Adverse Siltation Existing Siltation Adverse Groundwater drawdown Existing Groundwater drawdown Adverse Environmental Contamination/Pollution Existing Environmental Contamination/Pollution Adverse Exotic/Feral/Introducted Species Existing Exotic/Feral/Introducted Species Adverse Erosion Existing Erosion COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - The watercress darter, Etheostoma nuchale, is known from only three springs in Jefferson County, AL. Glenn Spring, the type locality (01), has shown wide fluctuations in flow (01,08,08) and there is fear that recharge of the spring is being adversely affected by increasing urban development. This spring is also situated next to heavily used county highway 20 and widening of this highway or an accidental toxic spill could destroy this population. Finally, the lower portion of the spring run shows increased eutrophication and is in danger of being choked by an overabundance of aquatic plants (08). Thomas Spring, on the Watercress Darter National Wildlife Refuge, was severely impacted by the 1976 introduction of the grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, which destroyed vegetation the darter is dependent upon (09). The population is just now recovering following removal of the grass carp, reestablishment of the spring's aquatic vegetation, and the transplanting of 100 individuals from Glenn spring in April of 1981. Roebuck Spring, the third locality, is situated in an area of rapid urban development. Recently the State has expressed an interest in selling a tract of land just above the spring to private developers. Development close to the spring poses serious threats from construction runoff and disruption or contamination of the aquifer. In addition, both Roebuck and Glenn Springs have shown high coliform counts (08,09) indicating probable contamination by organic Management Practices - 1 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species DARTER, WATERCRESS Species Id ESIS254011 Date 13 MAR 96 pollution, possibly from septic tanks. Bacterial contamination has been pointed to (08) as a possible cause for the high incidence of gas bubble disease which often occurs in the Roebuck Spring population; however, supersaturation by nitrogen may be responsible. In assessing future threats to the species, the increase in urban development in this area of Jefferson County would appear to pose the most serious danger. This development is most likely to effect the species through disruption or pollution of the aquifers that the springs are dependent upon. Glenn Spring is also threatened by its proximity to a busy highway with its ever present danger of toxic spills. APPROVED PLAN: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Revised Recovery Plan for the Watercress Darter, Etheostoma nuchale. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 31 pp. Actions for the recovery of the watercress darter, Etheostoma nuchale, include: 1) Obtain long-term authority to manage and protect Glenn Spring and Roebuck Spring through land agreements, easements, acquisition, and/or maintaining a good working relationship with current land owners. 2) Conduct habitat enhancement projects at Glenn Spring and Thomas Spring, including creation of artificial habitat with low level dams, habitat revegetation, and modification of the stream banks. 3) Monitor habitats and populations. 4) Transplant watercress darters to other suitable habitats. 5) Control/Remove exotic species detrimental to this darter such as grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella. Current ongoing recovery activities include the recent construction of a second pond habitat at Thomas Spring (now the Watercress Darter National Wildlife Refuge), construction of three low level stone dams at Glenn Spring and monitoring of watercress darter population trends (scheduled to begin spring and summer 1985). Management Practices - 2
                                   (DRAFT) - References
                                Species DARTER, WATERCRESS
                                  Species Id ESIS254011
                                      Date 13 MAR 96



     

References

***** REFERENCES FOR ALL NARRATIVES EXCEPT N-OCCURRENCE ***** 01 Howell, W.M. and R.D. Caldwell. 1965. Etheostoma (Oligocephalus) nuchale, a new darter from a limestone spring in Alabama. Tulane Stud. Zool. 12(4):101-108. 02 Eddy, S. and J.C. Underhill. 1978. How to Known the Freshwater Fishes. 3rd ed. Wm. C. Brown Co., Dubuque. 215 pp. 03 Kuehne, R.A. and R.W. Barbour. 1983. The American Darters. Univ. Kentucky Press, Lexington, Ky. 177 pp. 04 Mettee, M.F. 1978. The fishes of the Birmingham-Jefferson County region of Alabama with ecologic and taxonomic notes. Geol. Surv. Ala. Bull. 115. 182 pp. 05 Moore, G.A. 1968. Fishes. Pages 21-165. IN: W.F. Blair, et. al. Vertebrates of the United States. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 06 Page, L.M. 1983. Handbook of Darters. T.F.H. Pub., Neptune City, NJ. 271 pp. 07 Smith-Vaniz, W.F. 1968. Freshwater Fishes of Alabama. Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. 211 pp. 08 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Revised Watercress Darter Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 31 pp. 09 Ono, R.D., J.D. Williams, and A. Wagner. 1983. Vanishing Fishes of North America. Stone Wall Press, Inc., Washington, D.C. 257pp. 10 Howell, W.M. January 1986. Personal communication. Biology Department, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229. 11 Stiles, R.A. Personal observations. Biology Department, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229. 12 Platania, S.P. 1980. Etheostoma nuchale. IN: Lee, et al., Atlas of North American Freshwater Fish. N. Carol. State Mus., Raleigh. ***** REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY ***** 01 Howell, W.M. and R.D. Caldwell. 1965. Etheostoma (Oligocephalus) nuchale, a new darter from a limestone spring in Alabama. Tulane Stud. Zool. 12(4):101-108. 02 Howell, W.M. and A. Black. 1976. Status of the watercress darter. Proc. Southeast. Fish. Counc. 1(3):1-3. 03 Howell, W.M. January 1986. Personal communication. Biology Department, Samford University, Birmingham, AL 35229. 04 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Revised Watercress Darter Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 31 pp. References - 1