(DRAFT) - Taxonomy
                       Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN-
                                Species Id ESIS404013
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



TAXONOMY

NAME - MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN- OTHER COMMON NAMES - MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN-;BLOSSOM and GREEN- ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Aquatic Molluscs PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - MOLLUSCA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - BIVALVIA, ORDER AND SUBORDER - UNIONOIDA, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - UNIONIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - EPIOBLASMA, SPECIES AND SSP - TORULOSA, GUBERNACULUM SCIENTIFIC NAME - EPIOBLASMA TORULOSA GUBERNACULUM AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Green-blossom Pearly Mussel Epioblasma torulosa gubernaculum (Reeve, 1865) KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Clam PHYLUM: Mollusca CLASS: Bivalvia ORDER: Unionoida FAMILY: Unionidae E. t. gubernaculum is a compressed headwaters form of E. torulosa. It is a medium-sized Cumberlandian species with a shell outline described as irregularly ovate, elliptical, or obovate (01, 02). Valves are inequilateral and solid with a short hinge ligament; umbos are full, somewhat turned forward, and in the anterior third of the shell (02). The periostracum has many distinct growth lines and is smooth and shiny, straw to yellow-green in color with numerous fine green rays. Poorly developed knobs may be present across the medial and/or posterior ridges. Sexual dimorphism occurs in this species. The posterior ridge in males is low and separated from the medial ridge by a furrow which ends ventrally in an emargination between the ridges (02). Females are typically larger than males and possess broadly rounded marsupial swellings extending from the mid-ventral margin to the posterior end. These swellings are somewhat flattened and dark green, occasionally Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN- Species Id ESIS404013 Date 13 MAR 96 marked by small radial furrows (02). Beak cavity of this species is shallow, and the pallial line and muscle scars are prominent. Nacre color ranges from white to salmon (03,04). Detailed descriptions and photographs of E. t. gubernaculum are included in previous publications (01,02,04,05). The form gubernaculum apparently graded into the big river form, torulosa, in the Tennessee River near Knoxville. In the Ohio River system, the form rangiana occurs (02). Clinal variation of the E. torulosa subspecies has been described (06). Some controversy still exists as to the valid generic name for these species, Epioblasma, Dysnomia, or Plagiola. All three have been used in the recent literature. A discussion of these generic names was presented in 1978 (04). Taxonomy - 2
                                  (DRAFT) - Status
                       Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN-
                                Species Id ESIS404013
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



STATUS

Coded Status Tennessee; Federal Endangered Tennessee; State Listed Virginia; Federal Endangered Virginia; State Recognized E: Federal Endangered COMMENTS ON STATUS - U.S. STATUSES AND LAWS: The green-blossom pearly mussel (Epioblasma torulosa gubernaculum) has been designated an Endangered species pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (50 CFR 17.11; P.L. 93-205, 87 Stat. 884; 16 U.S.C. 1531-1540), as amended. The subspecies has this status wherever found including the States of Tennessee and Virginia. This subspecies is protected by the Lacey Act (P.L. 97-79, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq.) which makes it unlawful to import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, or offspring): (1) in interstate or foreign commerce if taken, possessed, transported or sold in violation of any State law or regulation; or (2) if taken or possessed in violation of any U.S. law, treaty, or regulation or in violation of Indian tribal law. It is also unlawful to possess any wild animal (alive or dead including parts, products, eggs, and offspring) within the U.S. territorial or special maritime jurisdiction (as defined in 18 U.S.C. 7) that is taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any State law or regulation, foreign law, or Indian tribal law. RESPONSIBLE FEDERAL AGENCIES: USFWS -Responsible for the management/recovery, listing, and law enforcement/protection of this species. DOD (COE) -Responsible for the law enforcement/protection of this species with applicable State and Federal laws on public land under their control. Also responsible for management/recovery on Department of Defense lands. All Federal agencies have responsibility to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by that agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of Critical Habitat (50 CFR 402), and to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of the species. STATE STATUSES AND LAWS: Status - 1 (DRAFT) - Status Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN- Species Id ESIS404013 Date 13 MAR 96 STATE: Tennessee DESIGNATED STATUS: Endangered ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Wildlife Resources Agency STATE STATUTES: TN Code Ann., Chapter 9, Sec. 51-901 through 51-912, and Proclamations 75-15, 76-4 and amendments. STATE: Virginia DESIGNATED STATUS: Recognized Endangered ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY: Commission of Game and Inland Fisheries STATE STATUTES: State Code 29.231 to 29.237. INTERNATIONAL STATUSES, TREATIES AND AGREEMENTS: The green-blossom pearly mussel is listed in appendix I of CITES and is listed as Endangered in the IUCN Red Data Book, 1983. ECONOMIC STATUSES: There are no known commercial values, however the species' sedentary nature and filter feeding habits may make it useful as a water quality indicator. It has been shown that mussels accumulate such pollutants as heavy metals and pesticides. 74/10/17:39 FR 37078/37079 - Notice of review 75/09/26:40 FR 44329/44333 - Proposed rule 76/06/14:41 FR 24062/24067 - Final rule, listed as Endangered 76/06/16:41 FR 24367/24378 - Proposal - CITES I 77/02/22:42 FR 10484/10485 - Final - CITES I 81/02/27:46 FR 14652/14658 - Five year review 87/07/07:52 FR 25523/25528 - Notice of review Status - 2
     

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS

HABITAT - AQUATIC INLAND AQUATIC LAND USE - Streams and Canals NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY CODES NWI NWICLS NWIMOD NWISPEC Riverine, upper perennial UB1 Riverine, upper perennial SB1 COMMENTS ON HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS - E. t. gubernaculum is a Cumberlandian species inhabiting riffle and shoal areas in medium-sized (3-6 order) streams. Habitat is typically sand and gravel substrates with moderate to fast current (01). This species does not occur in the impounded sections of rivers. It is apparently quite sedentary, appears to be intolerant of silt and pollution, and requires ample water flow and stable substrate for survival. Eight species of Epioblasma, now presumed extinct, were recorded from riffles of large rivers (15). Habitat of the glochidia is initially within the gills of the female, then in the water column, and finally attached to a suitable fish host. Any alteration of these life stage-specific habitats during its life cycle would likely affect the long-term success of the remaining population. Habitat requirements or associations for the juvenile stage are unknown. Specific environmental requirements for the adults are also unknown. Habitat Associations - 1
                                (DRAFT) - Food Habits
                       Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN-
                                Species Id ESIS404013
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



FOOD HABITS

TROPHIC LEVEL - OMNIVORE LIFESTAGE FOOD FOOD PART General Detritus General Bacteria General Phytoplankton General Diatoms General Zooplankton General Fish Food Habits - 1
                         (DRAFT) - Environment Associations
                       Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN-
                                Species Id ESIS404013
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS

G = General A = Adult LIM = Limiting RA = Resting Adult J = Juvenile FA = Feeding Adult RJ = Resting Juvenile BA = Breeding Adult FJ = Feeding Juvenile P = Pupae L = Larvae E = Egg RL = Resting Larvae FL = Feeding Larvae
LIFESTAGE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATIONS G Aquatic Features: Pool areas Environment Associations - 1
                               (DRAFT) - Life History
                       Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN-
                                Species Id ESIS404013
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



LIFE HISTORY

FOOD HABITS: There are no known interspecific differences in feeding among freshwater mussels (07). The glochidia are probably obligate parasites on the gills or fins of fish. Adult mussels are filter-feeders and consume particulate matter suspended in the water column. Identifiable stomach contents almost invariably include mud, desmids, diatoms, other unicellular algae, protozoa, and zooplankters (16,17). No study of the food habits of the green-blossom has been conducted; required/preferred foods are therefore unknown. HOME RANGE/TERRITORY: Non-territorial. The species is sedentary during its adult life and generally occurs in streams with others of its kind. PERIODICITY: Nothing is known about this species, but other Epioblasma exhibit a seasonal periodicity (18). During the spawning period in spring, specimens are readily visible in the stream bottom. After spawning, these species burrow in the substrate with only siphons exposed. MIGRATION PATTERNS: Non-migratory. COVER/SHELTER REQUIREMENTS: The species occurs primarily in shallow water with moderate to fast current and stable, mixed substrate. No species-specific information on cover/shelter is available in the literature. REPRODUCTIVE SITE REQUIREMENTS: The green-blossom is a riffle and run species that occurred in free-flowing, medium-sized streams with moderate flow (01). Habitat is typically shallow water shoal areas with stable, mixed substrate. Since this species appears to be sedentary and movement is inconsequential, this is the type of environment where all life processes are carried out, including reproduction. REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS: The reproductive cycle of E. t. gubernaculum is presumed to be similar to other Epioblasma spp. (01). During spawning, males discharge sperm into the water column, and the sperm are taken in by the females during siphoning. Eggs are fertilized in the female's suprabranchial cavity or gills, which serve as marsupia for embryos developing to the parasitic stage (glochidia). Glochidia are released by the female and must attach to a suitable host for metamorphosis to the free-living juvenile stage. The green-blossom is probably a long-term breeder (19), spawning in late summer, retaining glochidia through fall and winter, and releasing glochidia the following spring/summer. The fish host(s) are unknown. PARENTAL CARE: Life History - 1 (DRAFT) - Life History Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN- Species Id ESIS404013 Date 13 MAR 96 Except for retention of the glochidia within the gills of the female prior to release, no parental care occurs. POPULATION BIOLOGY: No information exists on the population biology of this species. SPECIES INTERRELATIONSHIPS: The required fish hosts for the parasitic glochidia of this species are unknown (01). OTHER LIFE HISTORY DESCRIPTORS: None. Life History - 2
                           (DRAFT) - Management Practices
                       Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN-
                                Species Id ESIS404013
                                   Date 13 MAR 96



MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Beneficial Developing/maintaining stream structures Beneficial Maintaining/Controlling Water Flow Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Mining Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Road Maintainance Actions Beneficial Maintaining undisturbed/undeveloped areas Beneficial Land Acquisition Beneficial Controlling pollution [thermal, chemical, physical] Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Pesticide Use Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Herbicide Use Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Agricultural Practice Beneficial Stocking captive-reared wild-strain animals Beneficial Transplanting wild animals Beneficial Transplanting Wild Eggs/Wild Seeds Beneficial Restricting Poaching Beneficial Controlling/Restricting Noncommercial Harvest Adverse Collecting Existing Collecting Adverse Inherent Reproductive Characteristics Existing Inherent Reproductive Characteristics Adverse Low Gene Pool Existing Low Gene Pool Adverse Underground Mines Existing Underground Mines Adverse Surface Mines Existing Surface Mines Adverse Siltation Existing Siltation Adverse Water Temperature Alteration Existing Water Temperature Alteration Adverse Dissolved Oxygen Reduction Existing Dissolved Oxygen Reduction Adverse Water Level Fluctuation Existing Water Level Fluctuation Adverse Reservoirs Existing Reservoirs Adverse Migration barriers Existing Migration barriers Adverse Dredging Existing Dredging Adverse Applying herbicides Existing Applying herbicides Adverse Applying pesticides Existing Applying pesticides Adverse Environmental Contamination/Pollution Existing Environmental Contamination/Pollution Adverse Exotic/Feral/Introducted Species Existing Exotic/Feral/Introducted Species Adverse Erosion Existing Erosion Management Practices - 1 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN- Species Id ESIS404013 Date 13 MAR 96 RESULT MANAGEMENT PRACTICE Adverse Existing COMMENTS ON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES - The mussel fauna in most streams of the upper Tennessee River drainage has been impacted by dam construction, channelization, siltation and water pollution, which directly affect all mussel species (01,07). The change from lotic to lentic conditions because of dams has also altered the species composition of the fish community, thus jeopardizing the reproductive success of some mussel species by eliminating required fish hosts. Although siltation has been suggested as the most significant adverse effect of impoundments on mussels (07), other detrimental factors include lowered water temperatures, pH changes, oxygen depletion, and dewatering of mussel beds below dams (07). Mussel deaths can occur in substrate on which 0.6-2.5 cm of silt has accumulated, resulting in interference with feeding and suffocation (08). The siphoning period and metabolic rate of mussels can also be affected by such contaminants as heavy metals and agricultural chemicals (09). Coal waste from mining activities in southwestern Virginia has probably contributed to the decline of this species. Coal processing plants in the Clinch River and Powell River have contributed particulate matter to the rivers and altered substrate composition (01,10). Water pollution is another major factor that has apparently contributed to the decline of this species and other Epioblasma spp. Acid mine drainage in headwater tributaries of the Cumberland River has nearly eliminated the most diverse group of Epioblasma (11). Numerous streams in the upper Tennessee drainage were polluted already by early twentieth century, and the mussel fauna was in a decline at that time (12). The historic population in the Clinch River was likely affected by chemical spills in 1967 and 1970 at the APCO plant in Carbo, VA (13,14). All of the factors mentioned above (impoundments, siltation, coal mining, and water pollution) are still considered potential threats to the remaining population of E. t. gubernaculum. Other factors that may also be affecting this species include collecting by conchologists, invasion of the Asiatic clam (Corbicula fluminea), and the small gene pool which may be below minimum population size needed for sufficient genetic variation to respond to environmental changes. Substantial mussel die-offs of unknown origin that have occurred in the Tennessee River drainage since 1982 also pose a direct threat to the species' survival. APPROVED PLAN: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1984. Green-blossom Pearly Mussel Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 50 pp. Recovery actions for the green-blossom pearly mussel include: Management Practices - 2 (DRAFT) - Management Practices Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN- Species Id ESIS404013 Date 13 MAR 96 (1) Continue to utilize existing legislation and regulations to protect the species and its habitat. Immediate protection of the only known population, located in the Clinch River, is crucial to the continued survival of the spp. and to gain the knowledge needed to save it from extinction. (2) Conduct population and habitat surveys to determine the status and range of the species. (3) Determine present and forseeable threats to the species and strive to minimize and/or eliminate them. These negative impacts are likely to include coal related pollution, road construction, dredging, herbicide and pesticide spraying, industrial development, and chlorinated effluents. (4) Identify essential habitat in need of protection. Investigate the use of Scenic River status, mussel sanctuaries, land acquisition, and/or other means for the protection of this habitat and utilize where feasible. (5) Determine the feasibility of introducing the species back into its historic range and introduce where feasible. Determine the best methods for establishing new populations (e.g., introduction of adult mussels, juveniles, infected fish hosts, artificially cultured individuals and/or other means). Habitat restoration or improvement may by necessary to improve conditions for survival of the species (i.e., restoration of stream banks and channels and assurring optimum clean water flow). It is unlikely that removal from the Federal endangered or threatened species list could be achieved without the establishment of populations in other rivers and the expansion of the Clinch River population. Present recovery efforts involve studies to determine the impact of chlorine, enforcement of regulations, and information/education efforts. Management Practices - 3
                                   (DRAFT) - References
                         Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN-
                                  Species Id ESIS404013
                                      Date 13 MAR 96



     

References

***** REFERENCES FOR ALL NARRATIVES EXCEPT N-OCCURRENCE ***** 01 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1983. Recovery Plan for the Green-blossom Pearly Mussel [Epioblasma (=Dysnomia) torulosa gubernaculum (Reeve, 1865)]. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 50 pp. 02 Bogan, A.E. and P.W. Parmalee. 1983. Tennessee's rare wildlife volume II: the mollusks. Tenn. Wildl. Resour. Agency, Tenn. Dep. Conserv., and Tenn. Heritage Prog., Univ. Tenn., Knoxville, TN. 123 pp. 03 Simpson, C.T. 1914. A Descriptive Catalogue of the Naiades or Pearly freshwater Mussels. Bryant Walker, Detroit, MI. 3 volumes, 1540 pp. 04 Johnson, R.I. 1978. Systematics and zoogeography of Plagiola (=Dysnomia=Epioblasma) an almost extinct genus of freshwater mussels. (Bivalvia:Unionidae) from Middle North America. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 148:239-320. 05 Parker, W. and L. Dixon. 1980. Endangered and Threatened wildlife of Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee. NC. Agric. Ext. Serv. 122 pp. 06 Ball, G.H. 1922. Variation in freshwater mussels. Ecology 3:93-121. 07 Fuller, S.L.H. 1974. Clams and mussels (Mollusca:Bivalvia). Pages 215-273. IN: C.W. Hart and S.L.H. Fuller (eds.), Pollution Ecology of Freshwater Invertebrates. Academic Press, NY. 08 Ellis, M.M. 1931. Some factors affecting the replacement of the commercial fresh-water mussels. U.S. Bur. Fish. Circ. No.7. 10pp. 09 Salanki, J. 1979. Behavioural studies in mussels under changing environmental conditions. Symp. Biol. Hung. 19:169-176. 10 Neves, R.J., G.B. Pardue, E.F. Benfield, and S.D. Dennis. 1980. An evaluation of endangered mollusks in Virginia. Final Rep. VA. Comm. Game Inland Fish. Proj. No.E-F-1. 140 pp. 11 Neel, J.K. and W. Allen. 1964. The mussel fauna of the upper Cumberland Basin before its impoundment. Malacologia 1:427-459. 12 Ortmann, A.E. 1918. The nayades (freshwater mussels) of the upper Tennessee drainage with notes on synonymy and distribution. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., Phila. 57:521-626. 13 Raleigh, R.F., D.H. Bennett, and L.O. Mohn. 1978. Changes in fish stocks after major fish kills in the Clinch River near St. Paul, Virginia. Am. Midl. Nat. 99:1-9. 14 Cairns, J., Jr., J.S. Crossman, K.L. Dickson, and E.E. Herricks. 1971. The recovery of damaged streams. Assoc. Southeast. Biol. Bull. 18:79-106. 15 Stansbery, D.H. 1971. Rare and endangered mollusks in eastern United States. Pages 5-18. IN: S.E. Jorgenson and R.E. Sharp (eds.). Proceedings of a symposium on rare and Endangered mollusks (naiades) of the U.S. Bur. Sport. Fish. Wildl., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service., Washington, D.C. 16 Coker, R.E., A.F. Shira, H.W. Clark, and A.D. Howard. 1921. Natural history and propagation of fresh-water mussels. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 37:77-181. References - 1 (DRAFT) - References Species MUSSEL, PEARLY, BLOSSOM, GREEN- Species Id ESIS404013 Date 13 MAR 96 17 Churchill, E.P., Jr., and S.I. Lewis. 1924. Food and feeding in freshwater mussels. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish. 39:439-471. 18 Neves, R.J. 1984. Personal observations. VA. Coop. Fish. Res. Unit, VPI & SU, Blacksburg, VA. 19 Ortmann, A.E. 1919. Monograph of the naiades of Pennsylvania. Mem. Carnegie Mus. 4:279-347. ***** REFERENCES FOR N-OCCURRENCE NARRATIVE ONLY ***** 01 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1983. Recovery Plan for the Green-blossom Pearly Mussel [Epioblasma (=Dysnomia) torulosa gubernaculum (Reeve, 1865)]. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, GA. 50 pp. 02 Bates, J.M. and S.D. Dennis. 1978. The mussel fauna of the Clinch River, Tennessee and Virginia. Sterkiana 69-70:3-23. 03 Stansbery, D.H. 1971. Rare and endangered mollusks in eastern United States. Pages 5-18. IN: S.E. Jorgenson and R.E. Sharp (eds.), Proc. of a symposium on rare and Endangered mollusks (naiades) of the U.S. Bur. Sport Fish. Wildl., U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 04 Stansbery, D.H. 1970. Eastern freshwater mollusks. I. The Missippi and St. Lawrence River systems. Pages 9-22. IN: A.H. Clarke (ed.), Rare and Endangered mollusks of North America. Malacologia 13. 05 Ortmann, A.E. 1918. The nayades (freshwater mussels) of the upper Tennessee drainage with notes on synonymy and distribution. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc., Phila. 57:521-626. 06 Johnson, R.I. 1978. Systematics and zoogeography of Plagiola (=Dysonomia=Epioblasma) an almost extinct genus of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia:Unionidae) from Middle North America. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 148:239-320. References - 2