Modern Wild Faunal Resource System Management
| [ Web site Home | The Course's Home | Table of Contents | The Finder | Glossary ] |
Such estimates are:
Procedures:
| A powerful estimator is available for population abundance using estimates of animal home range. One or two animals per home-range area should approximate the total animals within an area and contribute to convergence on a useful population estimate.(These equations are based on data from many studies in many areas. The high R-square values are impressive.) |
|
Where H = home range in hectares and W is weight in gram: H = 0.002 W1.02 herbivores H = 0.059W0.92 omnivores H = 0.11W1.36 carnivores And taken together, H = 0.008W1.08 with r2 = 0.6 H = f (1/precipitation, latitude) H = f(sex, age) related to H = f(weight) Food consumption/day in grams Carnivores Where FCc is food consumption by carnivores then: FCc = 1.7W0.68 ± 0.02 approximately FCc = 1.7 W0.66 grams Birds FCb = 0.51W0.63 ± 0.11 approximately FCb = 0.5 W0.66 |
| From: Harestad, A. S. and F. L. Bunnell. 1979. Home range and body weight - a reevaluation. Ecology 60(2):389-402. |
| Concept: If you see more on some days, how long will it take to see them all? |
|
Observations: 100, 98, 118, 112, 113, 62, 105 Select largest number A = 118 Select next largest B = 113 N = 2A-B = (2 x 118) - 113 = 236 - 113 = 123 NL = 118 (at least these were all seen) NU = A + ((1.0 - a / a) (A - B)) NU = 118 + )(1 - 1.05)/0.05)(118 - 113) NU = 118 + (19)(5) = 213 |
| Premise: total marked animals (M) are to the unknown number (N) of animals, as the marked animals (m) are to the total animals in a sample. Thus: N = Mn/m |
|
The standard error is ([M2n(n-m)] / m3)0.5 Where M = 27, n = 23, m = 17; then SE = 4.5 Since N = 36.5, the upper limit of the estimate is (36.5 + 2(4.5)) = 45.4 and the lower limit (2 standard errors) is (36.5 - 9.0) = 27.5 The population, 95 times out of 100, will lie between 27 and 46 animals. |
|
N = (M(n+1) / (m +1)) - 1 SE = ((M2 (n+1)(n-m)) / ((M + 1)2 (m + 2)))0.5 |
| Example: Pheasants |
|
100 cock "crows" per hour before the hunt or in an early survey 3 removed Therefore: 70 crows heard later (30 "lost") X = 10 There were 10 pheasant cocks originally. Similar analyses can be made with track counts after deer hunts. |
Resisting the desire or pressure to estimate populations is counterintuitive for the person who gets into the field of faunal resource management because of their love of animals or desire to "work with" animals. Estimating abundance needs to be resisted. Failing that, converge on an estimate.
See uses of estimates within Managing Populations
"Estimating Numbers of Terrestrial Birds," edited by C. John Ralph and J. Michael Scott, has just been brought back (2003) into print by The Blackburn Press, making it available to libraries, scholars, researchers, ecologists and field ornithologists who would like to own or replace a copy of an invaluable reference.
See Ken Burnham and David Anderson's comments on AIC Myths and Misunderstandings.
References
(Davis, Part 2, Techniques Manual)
Abramson, N. and J. Tolladay. 1959. The use of probability sampling for estimating annual number of Angler Days. Calif. Fish and Game 45(4): 303-312.
Bergerud, A. T., and W. E. Mercer. 1966. Census of the willow
ptarmigan in Newfoundland. J. Wildl Manage 30(1):101-113.
Brotzman, _ L._and _ H. Giles, Jr. 1966. Electronic data processing
of capture-recapture and related ecological data. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 30(2): 286-292.
Chapman, D. G. and W. S. Overton. 1966. Estimating and testing differences
between population levels by the Schnabel estimation method. J. Wildl.Manage. 30(1):173-l80.
Chapman, D.G. and G. I. Murphy. 1965. Estimates of mortality and
population from survey-removal records. Biometric Soc. 2l(4):921-935.
Davis, J. 1965. The "singing male" method of censusing birds: a warning.
Condor 67(1):86-87.
Hayne, D.W. and D. Q. Thompson. 1965. Methods for estimating microtine
abundance. N. Amer.Wildl. and Nat. Res. Conf. 30:393-400.
Hein, D. Dale. 1966. Float counts vs flight counts as indices to abundance of
nesting wood ducks. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 30(1):13-l6.
Jolly, G. M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with
low death and immigration--stochastic model. Biometrika 52:J3l5-337.
Lovaas, A. L., J. L. Egan, and R.R. Knight. 1966. Aerial counting of two Montana elk herds. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 30(2):364-369.
Martinson, R. K. 1966. Proportion of recovered duck bands that are reported.
J. Wild1. Mgmt. 30(2):264-268.
Overton, W. S. 1965. A modification of the Sshnabel estimator to account
for removal of animals from the population. Wildl. Mgmt. 29(2):392- 395.
Pe1ikan, J., J. Zejda)and V. Holisova. 1964. On the question of
investigating small mammal populations by the quadrat method. Acta Theriologica
9(1):24 pp.
Reid, V. H., R. M. Hansen, and A. L. Ward. 1966. Counting mounds and earth plugs to
census mountain pocket gophers. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 30(2):v327-334.
Rupp, R. S. 1966. Generalized equation for the ratio method of estimating
population abundance. J. Wildl. Manage. 30(3):523-526.
S ittler, O. D. 1965. Theoretical basis for estimating deer population from
automatically collected data. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 29(2):38l-387.
Stirling, I., and J. F. Bendell. 1966. Census of blue grouse with recorded
calls of a female. J. Wi1d1. Mgmt. 30(1):184-187.
Swinebroad, J.. 1964. Net-shyness and wood thrush populations. Bird Banding 35(3):196-202.
Talbot, L.M. and D. R. M. Stewart. 1964. First wildlife census of the
entire Serengeti-Mara region, East Africa. J. Wi1d1. Mgmt. 28(4):815-827.
Yates, F.1965. Appendix on net shyness. Proc. Royal Soc. Zool. 144(1):22-23.
Go to the top.
Other Resources:
[ Web site Home | Lasting Forests (Introductions) | Units of Lasting Forests | Ranging | Trevey | Forests | Wildlife Law Enforcement Systems | Antler Points | Species-Specific Management | Wilderness | Appendices | Ideas for Development | Disclaimer]
| Quick Access to the Contents of LastingForests.com |
|---|
This Web site is maintained by R. H.
Giles, Jr.
Send an email message - Questions, revisions?
Last revision January 17, 2004.