| A unit of Lasting Forests
evolving since March 30, 1999 |
|
A Total Forest Management Plan
|
|
|
These interactions and feedbacks are so complex that they nearly defy human understanding.
N.R. French, 1972
In a major article in Bioscience (vol 47:747-757) the global ecological life support system, i.e., ecological services and natural capital, were analyzed. The phrases and concepts were mixed and cause and effect were often disputable but the analysis suggested that world ecological services were worth $2.9 trillion annually. The actual amounts hardly seem relevant. The list is important for it might become the basis for a consequence table, one depicting the changes in system processes and thus outputs of systems when modified by some process or form.
In another paper Costanza, R. R. d'Arget, de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387 (6230) is was reported that the ecological services were of 17 types in 16 biomes. The estimate was $16-54 trillion and averaged $33 trillion per year.
They said, for comparison, the gross "global national" product (for all of the world's countries) was $18 trillion per year.
The biome analyses required summing of (the services in each biome/unit area) x (area of each biome)
The 17 services highlighted in this paper (shown here) can be compared to those listed below. The services are changing flows of matter or material, energy, and information:
Psychologists say people are reluctant to change. We may need a strong perception of dire consequences to change...but perhaps a vision of something so "right" may be as motivating for people to tend their environment well.
Perhaps the following list may be re-organized and it may provide one basis for work to produce a computer program(s) that will show the likely changes within wildlands before each decision to change the environment is made.
Ecological services are difficult to discuss for "services" sounds positive and often there are negatives effects ... which are human value judgements and not "natural" or "ecological" or bio-physical. For example, animals disperse seeds but they aggregate others (into caches). They eat some but their gnawing or passage through their digestive system allows others to germinate. Thus they increase some, decrease others. They change the life form of some plants by their grazing, good in some situations for some forms of life, harmful for others. They propagate and influence mycorrhizae , beneficial to some plants (which may be competitors to others of great value.
"Processes" from general systems theory, is a better word to use than "services."
There are commodities provided such as building material, fuel, and other forest products.They once contributed to coal and fossil energy buildups and some are believed to continue to do so. Whether this can be called "services" needs to be discussed.
See 43 page text on services at http://www.frc.state.mn.us/Landscp/econ_lit_search_1003.pdf
See the 69 key ecological "functions" such as pollination and cavity creating in Berwick, S., B.G. Marcot, P. Paquet, and P. Whitney. 2001. Ecosystem-based selection of wildlife species for comparing future landscape alternatives in Columbia River Basin, p.60-63 inR. Filed, R.J. Warren, H. Okarma, P.P. Sievert (editors) Wildlife, land, and people:priorities for the 21st century, The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, MD.
See Daily, Gretchen C. 1997. Nature services, Island Press
| Quick Access to the Contents of LastingForests.com |
|---|
This Web site is maintained by R. H.
Giles, Jr.
Last revision July 1, 2004.