| A unit of Lasting Forests
evolving since March 30, 1999 |
|
A Total Forest Management Plan
|
|
|
Educate...To change behavior.
The education subsystem of the land needs to develop specific competency-based objectives such as:
1. To enable local citizens to list the environmental resources of the land ownership.
2. To have 80% or more of the local citizens and employees support and obey the environmental laws, rules, policies and guidelines of the ownership.
3. To promote desirable environmental behavior off the area but in the region.
These are objectives rooted in behavior. They state desired behavior and strive to avoid use of words such as "educate" or "teach." They may involve attitude change but that must result in some observable and significantly different change in behavior or acts. The differences between using these words and expressing objectives in this way with past efforts are often difficult to communicate. Not critical of the past, and well aware of past successes, the alternative effort may be suggested in the difference between education that:
1. teaches about birds and mammals vs causes behavior to obey the game laws.
2. teaches about recycling vs stops littering and starts home recycling and composting.
Working for behavioral change by a variety of media and pathways leads to realistic age- and responsibility-relevant actions on, with, or for the environment.
The above is considered general environmental education. We must progressively become more explicit about the behaviors we intend to change. A variety of activities designed to change specific behaviors may be conducted by the staff as time is allocated:
There are options suggested by the unique conditions of the area. The options are numerous and part of the plan is to consider a novel strategy for the area, perhaps selected from such options as:
These are not main-line educational system action, but, given the characteristics of the area and the sociopolitical and socioeconomic environment, they may be appropriate. These are suggestive only, for a non-traditional low-impact, mission-compatible work may be an appropriate role for the people and environment of the area.
We encourage clearly articulating behavioral objectives; doing intensive, repetitive work; using computers; giving abundant incentives and rewards; and using well-designed measurement devices to assure that desired behaviors are resulting from the efforts and costs.
We operate on the premise that there are many types of intelligence (Gordner and Hatch 1989).
| Table 1. Types of intelligence or "intelligences" adapted from Gordner and Hatch 1989:6 | ||
| Type | Representative Superior Level |
Components |
| Logical-Mathematical | Mathematician | sensitivity to and capacity to discern logical or numerical patterns; abilities to handle long chains of reasoning |
| Linguistic | Poet | sensitivity to the sounds , rhythms, and meanings of words; sensitivity to and ability to use the different functions of language |
| Audial1 | Violinist | abilities to produce and appreciate rhythm, pitch and timbre; appreciation of the forms of musical expression |
| Graphical2 | Painter | abilities to represent the world and ideas in two dimensions; sensitivity to color, hue, contrast, and proportion |
| Spatial | Sculptor | abilities to perceive the visual world accurately and to represent that perception in some way; abilities to work in more than two dimensions |
| Bodily (kinesthetic) | Dancer | abilities to control personal body movements and to handle objects skillfully |
| Interpersonal | Salesperson | abilities to discern and respond appropriately to the moods, temperaments, motivations, and desires of other people |
| Intrapersonal | Self-knowledge | access to accurate, detailed personal feelings; ability to discriminate among them and draw on them to guide behavior; knowledge of personal strengths, weaknesses, desires, and levels within types of intelligence |
|
1Listed as musical by Gordner and Hatch (1989:6) 2Added by the author. Abilities to work in two dimensions such as drafting, drawing, painting and weaving cloth are notably different from those of wood carving, sculpting, carpentry, or tool making. Highly related to abilities to work in three dimensions, the ability to make transformations from two to three dimensions is different than ability to transform from three or more to two. |
||
![]() |
References
Gordner, H and T. Hatch. 1989. Multiple intelligences go to school: educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher 18(8):4 - 10.
| Quick Access to the Contents of LastingForests.com |
|---|
This Web site is maintained by R. H.
Giles, Jr.
Last revision July 1, 2004.