![]() |
The Border
Rural and Urban
![]() |
Resource managers at the border (the wildland-urban interface) are challenged by the homes and activities that present needs and obstacles to what they can do as managers. Paved surfaces change the flow of rainwater, roads and road barriers intersect animals' areas, curbs present barriers to small amphibians and reptiles, and free-ranging pets create special problems for birds and small animals (and are prey for others).
The cities and towns are said to be encroaching on the rural area; the rural area with its noises, odors, and unsightly and unplanned conditions are said to be infringing on urban quality of life. Whether from the urban responding outward or the rural responding inward, there is work ahead.
![]() |
Rural System has been formed for the rural areas and so its initial perspective has been that of providing benefits for people of the rural area. The Border addresses the conditions and problems at the edge of cities and continues to leave (as much as possible) to experts of the inner city and town. It has much to offer there but must set some limits for many reasons, chief being profitability, marketing, and "span of control." The diverse objectives of people of the inner city are rarely precise enough for effective systems work.
Past emphasis has been on bringing the Rural System idea and solutions to rural residents. The Borders emphasis is on selling Rural System services and messages to urban dwellers, the primary market for the benefits being developed.
![]() |
| As species of animal populations change with distance from one type of vegetation (A moving to the right) and species common the the B area decline with distance (shown as to the left), the sum of the species near the center of the ecotone can be seen as the red line. This has been called the edge effect. It is like the problem set at the urban/rural border. |
Software development for urban areas in all of the above may be possible. Border can become the center of computer-based instruction (and aids) in all aspects of faunal system management to meet rapidly changing needs in extension, fisheries and wildlife programs and ecology groups. Distance learning courses with their software may be sold to universities (e.g., urban faunal management ) and to urban staff for specialized conflict "solutions" (e.g., deer problems).
Problems for gardeners in the Border may loom. A December 2007 note:
California has created a set of guidelines - Good Agricultural Practices (GAPS) – that include growing practices that discourage biodiversity and sustainable/organic farming methods, deplete soil fertility, and create “sterile” fields; their new rules require testing water monthly and keeping animals off of farmland. These methods have not been scientifically proven actually to reduce E. coli 0157 bacteria but are certain to reduce biodiversity, harm wildlife, and burden family-scale farms.
A special type of border is that between residences (all types) and public lands. By Forest Service estimates (2009), the number of OHVs (off-highway-vehicle) motoring through national forests has increased from about 3 million in 1993 to about 11 million today. BLM estimates that one-third of the 50 million visitors to BLM (Bureau of Land Management) units each year are now off-roaders.Part of the increase can be traced to population growth: About 41 million people now live within 200 miles of federal lands, and about half of those live within 30 miles of a public land unit, according to BLM.
See Vandalism re parks
See Urban Wildlife Note.
See Society for Organic Urban Landcare
A file of a set of Urban dialogs is available.
Perhaps you will share ideas with me about some of the topic(s) above .
Home
Rural System
Glossary
Robert H. Giles, Jr.
September 29, 2007