|
Species ID |
050250 |
|
Name |
Lesser White-lined bat |
|
Other Common Names |
|
|
Category |
05 Mammals |
|
Phylum |
|
|
Subphylum |
|
|
Class |
Mammalia |
|
Subclass |
Theria |
|
Suborder |
Microchiroptera |
|
Family |
Emballonuridae |
|
Genus |
Saccopteryx |
|
Species |
leptura |
|
Subspecies |
|
|
References |
1, 2, 3, 7 |
7* No subspecies.
|
Status Code |
Status Translation |
References |
|
271 |
Common: high density, likely to be seen in many places |
4 |
|
DISTRICT |
References |
|
Stann Creek |
14 |
|
Toledo |
12 |
|
Orange Walk |
6 |
|
Administrative Unit |
Occurrence |
Abundance |
Temporal |
References |
|
Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary |
Collected as voucher. |
Unknown, insuffient data |
Dry season (Jan-May) |
14 |
|
Temash-Sarstoon National Park |
Recorded vocalization, tape or Anabat. |
Unknown, insuffient data |
January |
11 |
|
BFREE - Private Reserve |
Recorded vocalization, tape or Anabat. |
Unknown, insuffient data |
November |
11 |
|
BFREE - Private Reserve |
Recorded vocalization, tape or Anabat. |
Unknown, insuffient data |
October |
11 |
|
Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary |
Captured or Mist netted and released |
Unknown, insuffient data |
June |
12 |
|
Columbia River Forest Reserve |
Recorded vocalization, tape or Anabat. |
Unknown, insuffient data |
January |
10 |
|
Columbia River Forest Reserve |
Collected as voucher. |
Unknown, insuffient data |
March |
13 |
|
Government land |
Recorded vocalization, tape or Anabat. |
Unknown, insuffient data |
January |
9 |
|
Columbia River Forest Reserve |
5 |
|||
|
Rio Bravo Conservation Area |
Captured or Mist netted and released |
Dry season (Jan-May) |
6 |
|
Hydrologic Unit Distribution |
References |
|
Blue Creek |
11 |
|
Temash River |
11 |
|
Bladen Branch |
11 |
|
North Stann Creek |
12 |
|
New River |
6 |
|
ELEVATION Association |
References |
|
201-400 m |
13 |
|
1-200 m |
14, 9 |
|
601-800 m |
10 |
|
QUAD Distribution |
References |
|
16 00' to 16 15'; 89 00' to 89 15' |
11 |
|
15 50' to 16 00'; 88 50' to 89 15' |
11 |
|
16 45' to 17 00'; 88 15' to 88 30' |
14, 12 |
|
16 15' to 16 30'; 89 00' to 89 15' |
10 |
|
16 30' to 16 45'; 88 30' to 88 45' |
11, 9 |
|
17 30' to 17 45'; 88 30' to 88 45' |
5 |
|
16 15' to 16 30'; 89 00' to 89 15' |
13, 6 |
|
Holdridge Life Zone Distribution |
References |
|
Tropical wet-transition to Subtropical |
11 |
|
Tropical moist-transition to Subtropical |
14,12 |
|
Subtropical wet |
11, 9 |
|
Subtropical Lower Montane moist |
10 |
Comments on Distribution
9* Las Sierritas, Toledo District. 6* 1 allegedly netted at Hillbank, probably S. bilineata. 5* Salamanca Camp 2* not shown for Belize
|
Map of known distribution |
|
|
Vocal signature |
|
|
Vocal signature with feeding buzz |
|
|
Vocal signature with call paramters shown |
|
|
Forest Type Associations |
Seral Stage |
Canopy Closure |
References |
|
Broadleaf hill forests over limestone in steep terrain. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
11 |
|
Broadleaf Forest Rich in Lime-loving Species |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
11 |
|
Freshwater swamp forest (permanently waterlogged), typical variant. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
11 |
|
Broadleaf Forest Rich in Lime-loving Species |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
11 |
|
Agriculture, no native vegetation. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
11 |
|
This serves to update Wright et al. for urban or agricultural areas devoid of native vegetation. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
11 |
|
Lowland broadleaf rain forests over moderately lime-rich alluvium. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
11 |
|
Transitional Broadleaf Forest Poor in Lime-loving Species |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
11 |
|
Lowland broadleaf moist evergreen seasonal forests over poor soils. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
14,12 |
|
Transitional Broadleaf Forest Poor in Lime-loving Species |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
14,12 |
|
Broadleaf hill forests over non-calcareous rocks, Santa Maria variant. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
13 |
|
Broadleaf Forest with few Lime-loving Species |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
13 |
|
Broadleaf Forest Rich in Lime-loving Species; Ramon-Chiquebul forest. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
10 |
|
Broadleaf hill forests over limestone in rolling or flat terrain. |
all stages |
Canopy unknown |
10 |
References on Trophic Level
8
Comments on General Food Habits
8* Nothing is known of specific food habitats of this species. Based on the mass of S. leptura, Bradbury and Vehrencamp (1976a) estimated the mean length of prey items at about 2.6mm. Foraging territories are maintained and actively defended by colonies of S. leptura. Territorial defense mechanisms include aerial chases and vocalizations. The size of foraging territories appears to vary according to location and population density, but has been estimated to range from 0.10 to 1.8 ha/colony. In Trinidad and Costa Rica, S. leptura seems to restrict its foraging activities to forest areas or their margins. Mature lowland and lower montane forests are preferred (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1976a). At a site at La Pacifica, Costa Rica, S. leptura foraged only within or at the margins of riparian forests (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1976a). Lesser white-lined bats occasionally may forage over streams, but a closed canopy appears to be an essential element of preferred foraging habitat. This species has been found underneath mango (Greenbaum and Jones, 1979) and banana leaves, under a coconut tree frond (Goodwin and Greenhall, 1961), within old ruins, and over roads through tropical woodlands (Polanco et al., 1992). In Costa Rica and Trinidad, S. leptura began foraging at dusk and continued to forage throughout the middle half of the night. In Trinidad, the species sometimes has been observed foraging in the understory during daylight hours (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1976a). During the twilight period of the evening, foraging activities have been observed at heights up to 13.5 m, where flight appeared to be concentrated within a small, open area below the lower canopy of an evergreen, seasonal forest (McCarthy, 1987). Where the two species are sympatric, S. leptura may forage slightly earlier in the evening hours than its congener, S. bilineata (McCarthy, 1987).
Life History Narrative
8* The lesser white-lined bat roots in small colonies in parts of its range. Colony sizes ranging two to nine bats per colony have been reported from Costa Rica, and the mean size for 24 colonies studied on Trinidad over a year's time was 2.6 bats per colony (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1976a). In Trinidad, roosting groups seldom consisted of more than five individuals (Goodwin and Greenhall, 1961). Mean colony sizes tend to have low temporal variations and unimodal distributions when sampled over a large area (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1976b). Population densities of S. leptura ranged from 2.5/ha in Costa Rica to 17.6/ha of this bat in these areas has estimated at 14-97 g/ha (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1977a). S. leptura roams between roosting sites and colonies, and group compositions change over time (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1976a). In Costa Rica, roosting sites of S. leptura were found within riparian forests, where roost usually were located in exposed boles of a large variety of trees (Bradbury and Vehrencamp, 1976a, 1976b). This bat also has been captured in mature evergreen forest habitats in Peru (Tuttle, 1970).
1 McCarthy, T. J. 1993. Checklist: Mammals of Belize. BAS Newsletter 25 (2-3). 2 Hall, E. R. 1981. Mammals of North America. Second ed. John Wiley & Sons. New York. 1:80 3 Koopman, Karl F. 1993. Chiroptera. in Wilson, D. E., and D. M. Reeder, eds, Mammalian species of the world, 2nd ed, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 137-241. 4 Emmons, L. H. 1990. Neotropical Rainforest Mammals, a field guide. University of Chicago Press. Chicago and London. p.45-46 5 McCarthy, T. J. 1987. Distributional records of bats from the Caribbean lowlands of Belize and adjacent Guatemala and Mexico. In: Studies in Neotropical Mammalogy: Essays in Honor of Philip Hershkovitz (B.D. Patterson and R.M. Timm, eds.). Fieldiana:n.s. No. 39:137-162. 6 Smith, Rosemary L. 1994. Neotropical Bats as Indicators of Environmental Disturbance. Masters Thesis. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology. pp.64. 7 Koopman, Karl F. 1994. Chiroptera: Systematics (in) Handbook of Zoology. W. de Gruyter. Berlin-NY. p.46. 8 Yancey, II, F.D., J.R. Goetze, and C. Jones. 1998. American Society of Mammalogists. Mammalian Species No. 582:1-3. 9 Miller, B.W. and C.M. Miller. 1998. Las Sierritas, Toledo District, Belize. Rapid Environmental Appraisal Report for Mott MacDonald, Ltd. 6-10 January 1998. 10 Miller, B.W. 1997. Columbia River Forest Reserve Expedition 17-23 February, 1997, Bat Survey. Wildlife Conservation Society Tropical Forest and Reserve Planning Project Belize. Technical Report. 19 pp. 11 Miller, B.W. 2000. Miscellaneous unpublished data records from surveys conducted in Belize for which no specific report was written. Data includes results of mist-netting, harp trapping and acoustic surveys. Wildlife Conservation Society, Tropical Forest and Reserve Planning Project, Belize. 12 Miller, B.W. and C.M. Miller. 1999. Results of a survey of bats of the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary. Wildlife Conservation Society, Tropical Forest and Reserve Planning Project, Belize. Technical Report for Belize Audubon Society. 16 pp. 13 CM. 1997. Carnegie Musuem, Division of mammals. Data imported on date: 06/13/00. 14 Miller, B.W. 2001. Community Ecology of the Non-phyllostomid bats of Northwestern Belize, with a landscape level assessment of the bats of Belize. PhD. Dissertation. University of Kent, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology.